颈椎动态稳定器治疗单节段颈椎病的回顾性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2019.01.022

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 124-128.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2019.01.022

颈椎动态稳定器治疗单节段颈椎病的回顾性研究

孟祥龙, 海涌, 杨晋才, 苏庆军

首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科, 北京 100020

收稿日期:2018-08-22 出版日期:2019-01-21 发布日期:2019-01-23
通讯作者: 海涌 E-mail:spinesurgeon@163.com
基金资助:
吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项（320675015040）。

Retrospective study of cervical dynamic stabilization in the treatment of single level cervical spondylosis

Meng Xianglong, Hai Yong, Yang Jincai, Su Qingjun

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China

Received:2018-08-22 Online:2019-01-21 Published:2019-01-23
Supported by:
This study was supported by Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Special Fund for Clinical Research (320675015040).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的回顾性研究颈椎动态稳定器（dynamic cervical implant，DCI）治疗颈椎病的手术治疗效果。方法对16例颈椎间盘切除减压DCI植入的颈椎病患者进行了回顾性研究，手术节段包括C4-5、C5-6、C6-7，其中C4-5节段3例，C5-6节段7例，C6-7节段6例，分别在术前、术后3个月、6个月、1年获得了完整的随访资料。临床评分采用疼痛视觉模拟评分（visual analogue score，VAS）和颈椎功能障碍指数（neck disability index，NDI）分别进行术前术后疗效的对比。记录手术时间、术中出血量，观察颈椎过伸过屈位X线片评价假体的稳定性，是否有假体位移、下沉，以及邻近节段活动度等的影像学表现。结果术后3个月、6个月、1年的资料显示NDI评分、颈痛VAS和上肢痛VAS与术前评分相比，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。手术节段保留明显的活动度，相邻节段未见到明显的退变不稳。随访过程未见到假体松动、移位，围手术期无明显神经损伤、感染病例。结论单节段颈椎病前路间盘切除减压DCI动态内固定术具有良好的手术治疗效果，术后1年随访显示该术式保留手术节段和邻近节段的活动度，维持改善患者颈椎的矢状面曲线。

关键词: 颈椎病, 颈椎动态稳定器, 颈椎矢状面力线, 单节段

Abstract: Objective To study dynamic cervical implant (DCI) in the treatment of single level operation curative effect of cervical spondylosis. Methods We reviewed 16 cervical spondylosis patients treated with DCI. Surgical levels include C4-5, C5-6, C6-7, among them 3 cases at C4-5, 7 cases at C5-6, 6 cases at C6-7. All patients had complete follow-up data, including preoperative, postoperative 3 months, postoperative 6 months and postoperative 12 months. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative clinical score by visual analogue score (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) were done. The operation time, amount of blood loss, cervical extension and flexion prosthetic stability, displacement of the prosthesis, subsidence, and adjacent segment motion imaging were recorded. Results Compared with preoperative NDI and VAS score, significance were found at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow-up, VAS and NDI scores significantly improved. Good mobility was maintained and no adjacent segment degeneration was observed. No internal fixation loosening, displacement, no perioperative nerve injury and infection cases occurred. Conclusion 1 year follow-up results showed that single level cervical spondylosis decompression and internal dynamic fixation with DCI has excellent surgical outcomes for cervical spondylosis, maintaining index and adjacent segmental mobility, and improve the cervical sagittal alignment.

Key words: cervical spondylosis, dynamic cervical implant, cervical alignment, single level

中图分类号:

R765.4

孟祥龙, 海涌, 杨晋才, 苏庆军. 颈椎动态稳定器治疗单节段颈椎病的回顾性研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 124-128.

Meng Xianglong, Hai Yong, Yang Jincai, Su Qingjun. Retrospective study of cervical dynamic stabilization in the treatment of single level cervical spondylosis[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2019, 40(1): 124-128.

参考文献

[1] Hilibrand A S, Carlson G D, Palumbo M A, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1999,81(4):519-528.
[2] Sekhon L H. Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2003,16(4):307-313.
[3] Walraevens J, Demaerel P, Suetens P, et al. Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan cervical disc[J]. Neurosurgery,2010,67(3):679-687, 687.
[4] Matge G, Berthold C, Gunness V R, et al. Stabilization with the dynamic cervical implant:a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression[J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2015,22(3):237-245.
[5] Mo Z J, Zhao Y B, Wang L Z, et al. Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue[J]. Eur Spine J,2014,23(3):613-621.
[6] Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion[J]. Spine J,2004,4(6):624-628.
[7] Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease[J]. Spine J,2009,9(4):275-286.
[8] Zigler J E, Delamarter R, Murrey D, et al. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease:five-year results of a food and drug administration study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2013,38(3):203-209.
[9] Kim S W, Limson M A, Kim S B, et al. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases[J]. Eur Spine J,2009,18(2):218-231.
[10] 孙宇,赵衍斌,周非非,等. Bryan颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后5年随访结果[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(1):1-7.
[11] Rundell S A, Auerbach J D, Balderston R A, et al. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(23):2510-2517.
[12] Galbusera F, Anasetti F, Bellini C M, et al. The influence of the axial, antero-posterior and lateral positions of the center of rotation of a ball-and-socket disc prosthesis on the cervical spine biomechanics[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon),2010,25(5):397-401.
[13] Rundell S A, Auerbach J D, Balderston R A, et al. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(23):2510-2517.
[14] Shichang L, Yueming S, Limin L, et al. Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty and cervical total disc replacement for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease[J]. J Clin Neurosci,2016,27:102-109.
[15] Wang L, Song Y M, Liu L M, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dynamic cervical implant replacement for treatment of single-level degenerative cervical disc disease:a 24-month follow-up[J]. Eur Spine J,2014,23(8):1680-1687.
[16] Rong X, Lou J, Li H, et al. How to choose when implants of adjacent height both fit the disc space properly in single-level cervical artificial disc replacement[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(29):e6954.
[17] Wang L N, Hu B W, Wang L, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease:a minimal five-year follow-up[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2018,19(1):101.
[18] 毛宁方,赵颖川,倪海健,等. 颈前路非融合与融合技术联合应用治疗颈椎病[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(6):531-535.
[19] Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C, et al. Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2012,37(6):433-438.
[20] 马迅,梅军,冯皓宇,等. Hybrid手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2013,33(8):792-796.
[21] 刘海鹰,许晓诺,王波,等. 双节段Hybrid手术治疗颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华外科杂志,2012,50(3):238-242.
[22] 李忠海,侯树勋,李利,等. 颈椎动态稳定器植入术治疗颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国骨伤,2014,27(12):1050-1055.
[23] 周少波,朱六龙,何齐芳. 动态稳定器在颈椎病合并骨质疏松中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学,2014,12(1):26-28.

颈椎动态稳定器治疗单节段颈椎病的回顾性研究

Retrospective study of cervical dynamic stabilization in the treatment of single level cervical spondylosis

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张亘瑷, 侯宇, 陈迎春, 丁立祥. C₃椎板切除并重建C_4-7棘突的改良单开门椎板成形术[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(4): 522-527.
[2]	海涌;鲁世保;王庆一;张岑山;苏庆军;关立;康南;周立金. 单节段伤椎椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰段骨折[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2008, 29(6): 686-689.
[3]	张庆明;沈惠良;王居勇. 改良单开门椎管成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床观察[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2008, 29(3): 391-394.
[4]	陈兵;雍宜民;张常在. 经皮颈椎间盘切除术25例临床观察[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 1998, 19(2): 144-146.
[5]	李方祥;今井晋二;福田真辅. 脊髓型颈椎病骨性椎管和脊髓比例关系的研究在CT脊髓造影片上的测量[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 1995, 16(2): 132-135.