Submission or Manuscript Instruction | Template | Authorization
Peer Review | Editor Work Editor-in-Chief | Office Work
Current Issue | Forthcoming Articles | Archive Most Read | Most Download | Most Cited
Objective This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted and navigation-assisted techniques in the treatment of osteoid osteoma. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze differences in surgical time, blood loss, success rate, postoperative complications, and patient recovery between the two techniques. Methods A total of 64 patients with osteoid osteoma who underwent either robot-assisted (n=25) or navigation-assisted (n=39) surgery at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from August 2022 to December 2023 were included. Data on patient age, gender, lesion location, preoperative lesion size, blood loss, surgical time, follow-up duration, preoperative and discharge Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and success rates were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparative analysis. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, lesion location, preoperative lesion size, preoperative VAS score, and follow-up duration. The robot-assisted group had a significantly shorter surgical time than the navigation-assisted group [(102.64±21.65) min vs (120.46±30.98) min, P=0.025]. The amount of blood loss in the robot-assisted and navigation-assisted groups was [50 (20,50) ml] vs [50(20,100)ml], respectively, though this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.287). There were no significant differences in VAS score changes before discharge between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Robot-assisted surgery demonstrates significant advantages in the treatment of osteoid osteoma, particularly in terms of reduced surgical time and increased precision. Future studies should further explore the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of these two techniques to provide more comprehensive guidance for clinical practice.
Objective To evaluate its surgical effect and surgical safety of customized 3D printing cobalt-chromy-molybdenum partial talus for large uncontained osteochondral lesions of talus(OLT). Methods From October 2021 to April 2023, patients with large uncontained talus osteochondral lesions underwent 3D customized partial talus replacement in our center were enrolled. The 3D modeling software helped to design customized plan and prostheses prototype. Regular follow-up visits were conducted at 3 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Ankle function and pain were assessed again, and postoperative X-rays, implant position, and presence of periprosthetic radiolucency lines were assessed. Results The average lesion surface area of 12 patients was (252.5±91.1) mm2 and the volume was (1 571.5±99.0) mm3. The mean follow-up time was (21.7±5.6) months. The overall satisfaction rate is 91.7%. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) score (hindfoot) increased from (69.42±10.36)to(89.83±6.89).Foot Function Index(FFI) score decreased from (55.00±31.86)to(14.08±7.95). The average pain Visual Analog Scale(VAS) score decreased from (3.75±2.14)to(1.17±1.19), with statistically significant differences. There were no major complications such as infection, poor wound healing, and non-union of fractures. Conclusion For large uncontained OLT, the 3D customized printing prosthesis treatment showed high satisfaction with surgical results, improved significantly the patient function, and relieve the pain. No major complications were observed during an average follow-up of 21 months. It provides a novel clinical solution for the treatment of such OLTs.
Objective To study a novel orthopedic robotic system integrated with visualized tool packages and to compare the screw accuracy and clinical outcomes of the visualization robotic system with those of the traditional free-hand lumbar pedicle screw fixation. Methods A total of 43 cases with visualized robot-assisted single-segment lumbar spinal canal decompression with fusion were retrospectively analyzed, matched with 85 cases with traditional free-hand pedicle screw placement as the control group. The accuracy of pedicle screws was evaluated on postoperative lumbar computed tomography (CT) images. The two groups were compared in terms of the number of pedicle track adjustments, the number of pedicle screw turnback, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the operative time, the amount of blood loss, the postoperative hospitalization time, and the postoperative complications. Results The accuracy of screw placement in the robotic group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), the number of pedicle track adjustments and screw turnback were significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the operation time was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05), while the other perioperative parameters were not significantly different from those in the control group (P>0.05). Conclusions The accuracy of pedicle screw placement assisted by the novel visualized robotic system was significantly better than that of free-hand screw placement, and it could reduce the number of repeated adjustments of the pedicle track and screw turnback. Although its operation time is longer than that of traditional surgery, its clinical efficacy is not inferior to that of traditional surgery, and it has more advantages and potentials.