反转学习行为学范式对Sapap3 基因敲除小鼠认知灵活性的检测

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2024.02.014

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 262-270.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2024.02.014

反转学习行为学范式对Sapap3 基因敲除小鼠认知灵活性的检测

高明远^1，2#，孙晓红^1，2#，杨子成^1，2，徐群渊¹，雷慧萌^1，2*

1.首都医科大学基础医学院神经生物学系，北京100069； 2.首都医科大学儿童癫痫与认知发育基础临床联合实验室，北京100069

收稿日期:2023-05-16 出版日期:2024-04-21 发布日期:2024-04-25
通讯作者: 雷慧萌 E-mail:leihm@ ccmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(82271550，31970949),北京市教育委员会科学研究计划项目（KZ202210025029）。

Detection and exploration of cognitive flexibility by reversal learning

Gao Mingyuan^1,2#, Sun Xiaohong^1,2#, Yang Zicheng^1,2, Xu Qunyuan¹ , Lei Huimeng^1,2*

1. Department of Neurobiology，School of Basic Medical Sciences，Capital Medical University，Beijing 100069，China; 2.Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China

Received:2023-05-16 Online:2024-04-21 Published:2024-04-25
Supported by:
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271550，31970949), R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KZ202210025029).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的训练C57/6J野生型小鼠与Sapap3基因敲除小鼠分别进行嗅觉、触觉、听觉为线索的反转学习行为学学习，探究嗅觉、触觉、听觉为线索的小鼠反转学习范式的可行性与对Sapap3基因敲除鼠认知灵活性的探究。方法将8~10周的C57/6J野生型小鼠与Sapap3基因敲除鼠各分成3组，在头部固定的情况下进行反转学习行为学训练，通过分析各个阶段的舔水事件的正确率、错误率与学习速率等指标，观察小鼠在3种反转学习行为学范式下的学习能力。结果 Sapap3基因敲除鼠与C57/6J野生型小鼠在以嗅觉与听觉为线索的反转学习范式反转阶段达到学习标准所需的时间差异有统计学意义。结论反转学习行为学范式可用于对认知灵活性的检测并且Sapap3基因敲除小鼠的认知灵活性存在障碍，为后续进行对与认知灵活性相关的疾病与脑区的研究的奠定了行为学基础。

关键词: 认知灵活性, 反转学习, 强迫症

Abstract: Objective To train C57/6J wild-type mice and Sapap3 gene knockout mice to perform reversal learning induced by olfaction, tactility audition, respectively, and to explore the feasibility of reversal learning paradigm induced by olfaction, tactility audition and the cognitive flexibility of Sapap3 gene knockout mice. Methods C57/6J wild-type mice and Sapap3 gene knockout mice (8-10 weeks old) were randomly divided into three groups and trained with the head fixed. The correct rate, error rate and learning rate of the licking events at each stage were analyzed to observe the learning ability of the mice under the three reversal learning paradigms. Results The time required to reach the learning criterion was significantly different between Sapap3 knockout mice and C57/6J wild type mice in the reversal stage of olfactory and auditory reversal learning paradigm. Conclusion The behavioral paradigm of reversal learning can be used to detect cognitive flexibility, which lays a behavioral foundation for the subsequent research on the diseases and brain regions related to cognitive flexibility.

Key words: cognitive flexibility, reversal learning, obsessive compulsive disorder

中图分类号:

高明远, 孙晓红, 杨子成, 徐群渊, 雷慧萌. 反转学习行为学范式对Sapap3 基因敲除小鼠认知灵活性的检测[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(2): 262-270.

Gao Mingyuan, Sun Xiaohong, Yang Zicheng , Xu Qunyuan , Lei Huimeng. Detection and exploration of cognitive flexibility by reversal learning[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2024, 45(2): 262-270.

参考文献

［1］ Hollocks J M, Charman T, Baird G, et al. Exploring the impact of adolescent cognitive inflexibility on emotional and behavioural problems experienced by autistic adults［J］. Autism, 2022, 26(5): 1229-1241.
［2］ Wu J S, Hauert C, Kremen C, et al. A framework on polarization, cognitive inflexibility, and rigid cognitive specialization［J］. Front Psychol, 2022, 13: 35401343.
［3］ Price R B, Duman R. Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model［J］. Mol Psychiatry, 2020, 25(3): 530-543.
［4］ Gruner P, Pittenger C. Cognitive inflexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder［J］. Neuroscience, 2017, 345: 243-255.
［5］ Jones, G C R, Simonoff E, et al. The association between theory of mind, executive function, and the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder［J］. Autism Res, 2018, 11(1): 95-109.
［6］ Dajani D R, Uddin L Q. Demystifying cognitive flexibility: implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience［J］. Trends Neurosci, 2015, 38(9): 571-578.
［7］ Uddin Q L. Cognitive and behavioural flexibility:neural mechanisms and clinical considerations［J］. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2021, 22(3): 167-179.
［8］ Park J, Moghaddam B. Impact of anxiety on prefrontal cortex encoding of cognitive flexibility［J］. Neuroscience, 2017, 345: 193-202.
［9］ Bergstrom C H, Lieberman A G, Lieberman C G, et al. Dorsolateral striatum engagement during reversal learning［J］. Learn Mem, 2020, 27(10): 418-422.
［10］ Izquierdo A, Brigman J L, Radke A K, et al. The neural basis of reversal learning: an updated perspective［J］. Neuroscience, 2017, 345: 12-26.
［11］ Ritchey M C, Gilroy S P, Kuroda T, et al. Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks［J］. Learn Behav, 2022, 50(4): 494-508.
［12］ Bensky M K, Bell A M. Predictors of individual variation in reversal learning performance in three-spined sticklebacks［J］. Anim Cogn, 2020, 23(5): 925-938.
［13］ Welch J M, Wang D Q, Feng G P. Differential mRNA expression and protein localization of the SAP90/PSD-95-associated proteins (SAPAPs) in the nervous system of the mouse［J］. J Comp Neurol, 2004, 472(1): 24-39.
［14］ Chen M, Wan Y, Ade K, et al. Sapap3 deletion anomalously activates short-term endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity［J］. J Neurosci, 2011, 31(26): 9563-9573.
［15］ Wan Y H, Feng G P, Calakos N. Sapap3 deletion causes mGluR5-dependent silencing of AMPAR synapses［J］. J Neurosci, 2011, 31(46): 16685-16691.
［16］ Lei, H, Lai J, et al. Lateral orbitofrontal dysfunction in the Sapap3 knockout mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder［J］. J Psychiatry Neurosci, 2019, 44(2): 120-131.
［17］ Burguiere E, Monteiro P, Feng G, et al. Optogenetic stimulation of lateral orbitofronto-striatal pathway suppresses compulsive behaviors［J］. Science, 2013, 340(6137): 1243-1246.
［18］ Pinhal M C, Boom B J G V D, Santana K F, et al. Differential effects of deep brain stimulation of the internal capsule and the striatum on excessive grooming in sapap3 mutant mice［J］. Biol Psychiatry, 2018, 84(12): 917-925.
［19］ Wan Y, Ade K K, Caffall Z, et al. Circuit-selective striatal synaptic dysfunction in the Sapap3 knockout mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder［J］. Biol Psychiatry, 2014, 75(8): 623-630.
［20］ Huang F, Han L, Jiang Y, et al. Neural adaptation and cognitive inflexibility in repeated problem-solving behaviors［J］. Cortex, 2019, 119: 470-479.
［21］ Pena V A D L, Fernandez R M, Silva M P, et al. An fMRI study of cognitive regulation of reward processing in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)［J］. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging, 2022, 324: 111493.
［22］ Lange F, Seer C, Loens S, et al. Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive inflexibility in Parkinson's disease［J］. Neuropsychologia, 2016, 93(Pt A): 142-150.
［23］ Comparan M M, Vargas de la Cruz I, Jauregui H F, et al. Biopsychological correlates of repetitive and restricted behaviors in autism spectrum disorders［J］. Brain Behav, 2021, 11(10): e2341.
［24］ Yang Z, Wu G, Liu M, et al. Dysfunction of orbitofrontal GABAergic interneurons leads to impaired reversal learning in a mouse model of obsessive-compulsive disorder［J］. Curr Biol, 2021, 31(2): 3381-393 e4.
［25］ Britton C J, Rauch S L, Rosso M I, et al. Cognitive inflexibility and frontal-cortical activation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder［J］. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2010, 49(9): 944-953.

[1]	王丽辉, 张伟俊, 杨思敏, 朱琤, 林彬, 皋源, 向淑麟, 余跃天. 白念珠菌气道定植对铜绿假单胞菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(2): 187-193.
[2]	康彦红, 顾爱琴, 张莹, 黄帅. 基于label-free定量蛋白质组学方法筛选沉默CHAF1B基因后心肌细胞差异表达蛋白及调控网络分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(2): 312-321.
[3]	夏妙然, 周航, 王达祎, 陈萍. Lsd1对小鼠调节性T细胞发育及活化的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(6): 1006-1013.
[4]	贾焕珍, 焦洁, 高歌, 杨慧. 识别α-synuclein N端结构域的单克隆抗体鉴定及免疫应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(6): 1022-1028.
[5]	朱力鸣, 焦昆, 刘伟, 李胜利. 新型同种异体骨修复骨缺损对动物生理生化指标的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(6): 1053-1059.
[6]	王晶, 张国燕, 程杉. 孟德尔随机化的良好实践——孟德尔随机化分析的常见设计、关键挑战及优化[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(6): 1087-1094.
[7]	李琴, 胡悦, 秦啸峰, 冯志红, 王炜, 孙英. 呼吸道迟缓爱德华菌不同组分对肺部炎症作用的对比分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 0, (): 1036-1043.
[8]	李琴, 胡悦, 秦啸峰, 冯志红, 王炜, 孙英. 呼吸道迟缓爱德华菌不同组分对肺部炎症作用的对比分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 0, (): 1036-1043.
[9]	张晨光, 丁卫. 分子医学搏浪蓝海——兼谈基础医学学科发展及教育教学[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 0, (): 907-911.
[10]	张晨光, 丁卫. 分子医学搏浪蓝海——兼谈基础医学学科发展及教育教学[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 0, (): 907-911.
[11]	刘永梅, 郑双丽, 陈丹瑛, 宋焱君, 李星霖, 邱雅若, 宋川, 张媛媛, 王玺, 赵学森. 淋巴细胞抗原6复合物基因座E抑制新型冠状病毒不同变异株刺突蛋白介导的感染侵入[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(4): 652-662.
[12]	肖俐, 罗淑敏, 徐芳, 陈静, 邢恩鸿, 李伟华. 不同复苏方式对冻存外泌体的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(4): 639-644.
[13]	周妍, 吴巍. 萝卜硫素干扰微管与线粒体动力学抗肿瘤机制[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(3): 363-369.
[14]	陈彦, 张须龙, 许江南, 贾玉峰, 孙英. 现代免疫学在感染性疾病、过敏性疾病、肿瘤和神经系统疾病中的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 179-185.
[15]	王艺, 丁跃中, 许江南. 滤泡辅助性T细胞及其在抗体介导的肺移植排斥反应中作用的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 186-195.

反转学习行为学范式对Sapap3 基因敲除小鼠认知灵活性的检测

Detection and exploration of cognitive flexibility by reversal learning

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价