首都医科大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 245-247.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2016.02.027

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强脉冲光治疗痤疮的研究

梅雪岭, 刘娟, 李妍, 赵俊英   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院皮肤科, 北京 100050
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-09 出版日期:2016-04-21 发布日期:2016-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 赵俊英 E-mail:ZJY63014411@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81470587)

Study of intense pulsed light treatment for acne

Mei Xueling, Liu Juan, Li Yan, Zhao Junying   

  1. Department of Dermatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2015-10-09 Online:2016-04-21 Published:2016-04-14
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(81470587).

摘要: 目的 探讨强脉冲光(intense pulsed light, IPL)治疗痤疮时选择不同频次的疗效。方法 将50例痤疮患者采用数字表法随机分为两组,使用强脉冲光分别间隔2周与4周进行治疗4次,并于治疗结束后2周及4周评价其疗效及不良反应。结果 治疗后2周及4周,A、B两组Michelsons痤疮严重程度指数评分与治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后2周及4周,A组与B组评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 IPL治疗痤疮能够获得较好的临床效果, 间隔2周的治疗方法优于间隔4周的治疗方法。

关键词: 痤疮, 强脉冲光, 频次

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy of different frequency intense pulsed light(IPL) in treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods Fifty cases were randomly divided into two groups. A group received the treatment every 2 weeks, B group received the treatment every 4 weeks, continued treatment for 4 times. Michelsons scores were compared at the 2 and 4 weeks after the treatment. Results The therapeutic effects in the A and B group were significantly better than those before treatment (P<0.05). The therapeutic effects in the A group were significantly better than those of B group (P<0.05). Conclusion IPL can get better clinical results in acne treatment. Treatment interval of 2 weeks is better than treatment interval of 4 weeks.

Key words: acne vulgaris, intense pulsed light, frequency

中图分类号: