改良前列腺尖部分离技术保留尿道周围结构对前列腺癌根治术后即刻尿控的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.06.012

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 973-977.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.06.012

• 前列腺疾病基础与临床研究 • 上一篇下一篇

改良前列腺尖部分离技术保留尿道周围结构对前列腺癌根治术后即刻尿控的影响

王明帅¹, 熊天宇¹, 蒋铭心¹, 钱小松¹, 王思豪¹, 崔韵¹, 牛亦农^1,2*

1.首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京 100010;
2.首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院泌尿外科, 北京 100038

收稿日期:2021-08-17 出版日期:2021-12-21 发布日期:2021-12-17
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81770754)。

The effect of modified apical dissection and periurethral structure preservation in the immediate continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Wang Mingshuai¹, Xiong Tianyu¹, Jiang Mingxin¹, Qian Xiaosong¹, Wang Sihao¹, Cui Yun¹, Niu Yinong^1,2*

1. Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100010,China;
2. Department of Urology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China

Received:2021-08-17 Online:2021-12-21 Published:2021-12-17
Contact: * E-mail: 18601020160@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81770754).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探索改良前列腺尖部分离技术,保留完整尿道及周围结构对腹腔镜下前列腺根治性切除术后即刻尿控的影响。方法选取2020年9月至2020年12月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院确诊的前列腺癌患者,由同一手术团队完成的连续10例改良的前列腺尖部分离技术腹腔镜下前列腺根治性切除病例,收集围手术期资料,评估手术并发症及早期即刻尿控。结果患者平均年龄(68±9)岁,中位东部肿瘤协作组织(Eastern Cooperation Oncology Group,ECOG)评分为1分,中位最高前列腺特异抗原(prostate specific antigen, PSA)为15.05(7.05,31.00)ng/mL,临床分期cT2 8例、cT3 1例、cT4 1例。平均手术时间为(123±26)min,平均出血量约(63±28)mL。中位尿管留置时间为5(5,7)d,术后1周内拔除尿管后24 h内尿控完全恢复的患者9例。术后Clavien I级1例,90 d内无其他更高级并发症。患者病理分期pT2a 2例、pT2c 5例、pT3b 1例、pT4 2例,Gleason评分3+3 2例、4+3 5例、4+5/5+4 3例。本组10例患者尖部均有肿瘤,4例患者切缘阳性。结论改良前列腺尖部分离技术保留尿道周围结构能够明显改善即刻尿控,然而可能会增加尖部肿瘤的切缘阳性率,需要进一步改进技术,并通过更大样本及更长的随访证实疗效。

关键词: 前列腺癌, 前列腺根治性切除, 尿道, 尿控

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of modified apical dissection and periurethral structure preservation in the immediate continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Methods The patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Department of Urology of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from September 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study subjects. Among them, total 10 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with modified apical dissection and periurethral structure preservation by the same surgical team. The perioperative and follow-up data were collected for analyzing the perioperative complication and immediate continence rate. Results The mean age was 68±9, the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score was 1, the median maximum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 15.05(7.05,31.00)ng/mL. There were 8 cases for cT2, 1 case for cT3, and 1 case for cT4. The mean operative time was (123±26) min and the mean established blood loss was (63±28) mL. The median day of catheter removal was 5 (5, 7) days and 9 patients obtained complete urinary continence at the day of catheter removal. One case suffered Clavien I complication postoperatively. Totally 2 cases were diagnosed as pT2a, 5 cases as pT2c, 1 case as pT3b and 2 case as pT4. Gleason score of 2 cases was 3+3, 5 cases 4+3, and 3 cases 4+5/5+4. Four patients had positive apical surgical margin. Conclusion The primary study indicated that the technique of modified apical dissection and periurethral structure preservation could improve the immediate continence rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without compromising complication. However, the apical positive surgical margin was higher. The technique requires further development, and high-quality clinical study was required to confirm the efficacy.

Key words: prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, urethra, continence

中图分类号:

R737.25

王明帅, 熊天宇, 蒋铭心, 钱小松, 王思豪, 崔韵, 牛亦农. 改良前列腺尖部分离技术保留尿道周围结构对前列腺癌根治术后即刻尿控的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 973-977.

Wang Mingshuai, Xiong Tianyu, Jiang Mingxin, Qian Xiaosong, Wang Sihao, Cui Yun, Niu Yinong. The effect of modified apical dissection and periurethral structure preservation in the immediate continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2021, 42(6): 973-977.

参考文献

[1] Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen R C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol,2012,62(3):405-417.
[2] Nyberg M, Hugosson J, Wiklund P, et al. Functional and oncologic outcomes between open and robotic radical prostatectomy at 24-month follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO trial[J]. Eur Urol Oncol, 2018,1(5):353-360.
[3] Wagaskar V G, Mittal A, Sobotka S, et al. Hood technique for robotic radical prostatectomy-preserving periurethral anatomical structures in the space of retzius and sparing the pouch of douglas, enabling early return of continence without compromising surgical margin rates[J]. Eur Urol,2021,80(2):213-221.
[4] Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results[J]. Eur Urol,2007,51(3):648-658.
[5] Liu Y, Zhao Q X, Yang F Y, et al. “Sandwich” technique of total urethral reconstruction in the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective study[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2021,13:2341-2347.
[6] Zhou X C, Fu B, Zhang C, et al. Transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and surgical outcomes[J]. BJU Int,2020,126(2):300-308.
[7] Lee J, Kim H Y, Goh H J, et al. Retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy conveys early regain of continence over conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis of 1 863 patients[J]. J Urol,2020,203(1):137-144.
[8] 乔鹏,邢念增. 经腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(附9例报告)[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版,2009,3(1):25-29.
[9] Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6 336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004,240(2):205-213.
[10] Lee J, Kim H Y, Goh H J, et al. Retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy conveys early regain of continence over conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis of 1 863 patients[J]. J Urol,2020,203(1):137-144.
[11] Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad M A, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol,2017,72(5):677-685.
[12] Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥1 year of follow-up.[J]. Eur Urol,2013,64(6):974-980.
[13] Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Onol F F, et al. Modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation improves early postoperative functional recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Eur Urol,2020,78(6):875-884.
[14] Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, et al. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience[J]. J Urol, 2007,178(2):478-482.
[15] Carlsson S, Nilsson A E, Schumacher M C, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1 253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.[J]. Urology,2010,75(5):1092-1097.

改良前列腺尖部分离技术保留尿道周围结构对前列腺癌根治术后即刻尿控的影响

The effect of modified apical dissection and periurethral structure preservation in the immediate continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蒋铭心, 苏瑶, 熊天宇, 叶小波, 靳松, 邢念增, 金木兰, 杨敏福, 牛亦农. 减瘤性根治性前列腺切除术对骨转移前列腺癌患者的临床疗效分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 967-972.
[2]	叶小波, 熊天宇, 崔韵, 王明帅, 杨辉, 安卓玲, 牛亦农. 醋酸阿比特龙联合强的松治疗去势抵抗型前列腺癌的疗效分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 978-985.
[3]	覃艳, 吴栗洋, 张鹏, 胡小鹏. 原发性膀胱颈梗阻/原发性膀胱颈协同失调的诊断与治疗现状[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(5): 868-873.
[4]	樊笑琪, 刘志斌, 王明帅, 瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫, 宋黎明, 邢念增, 牛亦农. 腹腔镜单纯尿道前壁加强法与尿道前后壁加强法(Sandwich法)改善前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的对比分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 542-546.
[5]	熊天宇, 樊笑琪, 牛亦农. 不同改良术式对前列腺癌患者术后尿控及性功能恢复的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 558-563.
[6]	白志杰, 王新胜, 马洪顺, 李波. mpMRI与超声融合导航技术在前列腺靶向穿刺的临床研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 631-635.
[7]	谢英伟, 金仕鹏, 李爽, 王永辉, 王伟, 平浩, 刘跃新. TMPRSS2-ERG融合基因与转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌化学药物治疗后生存率的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(1): 103-107.
[8]	平浩, 马林祥, 王明帅, 龙军, 牛亦农, 刘跃新, 邢念增. 单羧酸转运蛋白4(MCT4)在前列腺癌中的表达及调控研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 59-64.
[9]	王蔚, 苏嘉明, 袁东波, 张伟, 陈卫红, 孙兆林, 朱建国. 微管相关蛋白1A在前列腺癌中的表达与其临床特征的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 65-71.
[10]	谢英伟, 金世鹏, 闫伟, 王伟, 平浩, 刘跃新. TMPRSS2-ERG融合基因在淋巴结转移前列腺癌中的阳性率及与生存的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 72-77.
[11]	丁显超, 宋黎明, 瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫, 牛亦农. 二次电切对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌疗效的影响分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 84-89.
[12]	陈思阳, 丰琅, 杜源, 杜林栋. 经尿道针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与经尿道钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗效果和安全性比较[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2018, 39(3): 439-443.
[13]	左灵坤, 阳荣辉, 马慧, 周萍, 孔璐. 生物信息学方法分析前列腺癌组织及细胞系中LMNA基因第七外显子点突变[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 884-890.
[14]	张继伟, 阎乙夫, 夏溟. 低危前列腺癌¹²⁵I粒子植入治疗尿路合并症的临床分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(2): 325-328.
[15]	瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫, 牛亦农, 邢念增. 前列腺癌化疗的发展及未来[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2016, 37(3): 299-306.