超声引导下经皮肾穿刺活检后出血的危险因素

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2022.05.005

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 694-699.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2022.05.005

• 肾脏病基础与临床研究 • 上一篇下一篇

超声引导下经皮肾穿刺活检后出血的危险因素

赵纬昊¹, 张亚妮¹, 李柯¹, 姚恬¹, 景兰梅¹, 霍雨佳², 马小琴¹, 王欣¹, 刘静¹, 马晓桃¹, 付荣国¹, 田李芳^1*

1.西安交通大学第二附属医院肾病内科,西安 710004;
2.西安交通大学医学部,西安 710061

收稿日期:2022-05-09 出版日期:2022-10-21 发布日期:2022-10-25
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(82170697),西安交通大学第二附属医院科研骨干项目[RC(GG)201906]。

Analysis of risk factors associated with bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies

Zhao Weihao¹, Zhang Yani¹, Li Ke¹, Yao Tian¹, Jing Lanmei¹, Huo Yujia², Ma Xiaoqin¹, Wang Xin¹, Liu Jing¹, Ma Xiaotao¹, Fu Rongguo¹, Tian Lifang^1*

1. Department of Neprology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China;
2. Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China

Received:2022-05-09 Online:2022-10-21 Published:2022-10-25
Contact: * E-mail: tianlifang0316@sina.com
Supported by:
General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170697), Backbone of Scientific Research Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University [RC(GG)201906].

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探究超声引导下经皮肾穿刺活检后出血的高危因素。方法以西安交通大学第二附属医院肾病内科2019年1月至2021年12月接受肾活检的1 026例患者为研究对象,根据肾活检病例是否发生术后出血分为无出血组(对照组,683例)和出血组(病例组,343例)。采用单因素分析筛选影响因素,采用多因素Logistic回归模型分析肾活检后出血的危险因素。结果超声下可探及出血的343例(33.4%)患者中,需治疗的大出血5例(0.49%)。单因素分析显示,出血组病例女性比例及平均体质量指数、血红蛋白浓度、红细胞数量、血小板数量、尿相对密度、尿蛋白定量、三酰甘油及总胆固醇浓度、凝血酶原活动度及凝血酶时间低于无出血组(P<0.05);而出血组病例的凝血酶原时间、国际标准化比值高于无出血组(P<0.05)。出血组中血肿面积与空腹血糖、活化部分凝血活酶时间呈显著正相关。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,血小板计数与肾穿刺后出血有关(OR=0.996,P<0.05)。结论血小板计数降低是超声引导下经皮肾穿刺活检后出血的高危因素。

关键词: 肾活检, 肾出血, 高危因素

Abstract: Objective To identify the risk factors associated with bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies. Methods Research subjects were 1 026 admitted patients who underwent renal biopsy in the second affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2019 to December 2021. We compared means of clinical indicators between bleeding patients (343 cases) and non-bleeding (683 cases) patients. Correlations were analyzed between bleeding size and each clinical indicator in all patients or bleeding patients. We selected the influence factors associated with bleeding events by Logistic regression. Results There were 343 (33.4%) cases with bleeding which were detected by ultrasound, including 5 cases (0.49%) with major bleeding which received therapy. The bleeding rate in women after renal biopsy was significantly higher than that in men (37.8% vs 29.4%, P<0.05). Among all the basic information and clinical indicators, body mass index, hemoglobin, red blood cells, platelets, urine specific gravity, urine protein, triglyceride, total cholesterol, prothrombin activity, thrombin time in bleeding group were all significantly lower than non-bleeding group. Oppositely, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio in bleeding group were all significantly higher than non-bleeding group. By further analyzing the data of the bleeding group, we found that the size of the hematoma was significantly positively correlated with fasting blood glucose and activated partial thromboplastin time. Through multivariate Logistic regression analysis, platelet counts were identified as high risk factors for bleeding events (OR=0.996, P<0.05). Conclusion Lower platelets counts are the high risk factors associated with bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies.

Key words: renal biopsy, bleeding events, high risk factors

中图分类号:

R692

赵纬昊, 张亚妮, 李柯, 姚恬, 景兰梅, 霍雨佳, 马小琴, 王欣, 刘静, 马晓桃, 付荣国, 田李芳. 超声引导下经皮肾穿刺活检后出血的危险因素[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(5): 694-699.

Zhao Weihao, Zhang Yani, Li Ke, Yao Tian, Jing Lanmei, Huo Yujia, Ma Xiaoqin, Wang Xin, Liu Jing, Ma Xiaotao, Fu Rongguo, Tian Lifang. Analysis of risk factors associated with bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2022, 43(5): 694-699.

参考文献

[1] Feldmann Y, Böer K, Wolf G, et al. Complications and monitoring of percutaneous renal biopsy - a retrospective study[J]. Clin Nephrol, 2018, 89(4): 260-268.
[2] Tøndel C, Vikse B E, Bostad L, et al. Safety and complications of percutaneous kidney biopsies in 715 children and 8573 adults in Norway 1988-2010[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2012, 7(10): 1591-1597.
[3] Manno C, Strippoli G F M, Arnesano L, et al. Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy[J]. Kidney Int, 2004, 66(4): 1570-1577.
[4] 程小红. 肾脏穿刺规范与注意事项[C]//第四届国际中西医结合肾脏病学术会议专题讲座汇编, 天津: 中国中西医结合学会, 2006: 215-217.
[5] Schorr M, Roshanov P S, Weir M A, et al. Frequency, timing, and prediction of major bleeding complications from percutaneous renal biopsy[J]. Can J Kidney Health Dis, 2020, 7: 2054358120923527.
[6] Atwell T D, Spanbauer J C, McMenomy B P, et al. The timing and presentation of major hemorrhage after 18,947 image-guided percutaneous biopsies[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2015, 205(1): 190-195.
[7] Esposito V, Mazzon G, Baiardi P, et al. Safety and adequacy of percutaneous kidney biopsy performed by nephrology trainees[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2018, 19(1): 14.
[8] Corapi K M, Chen J L T, Balk E M, et al. Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2012, 60(1): 62-73.
[9] Shidham G B, Siddiqi N, Beres J A, et al. Clinical risk factors associated with bleeding after native kidney biopsy[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2005, 10(3): 305-310.
[10] 曾玉纯, 杨荟, 陈俊哲, 等. 肾活检术后出血相关危险因素分析[J]. 岭南急诊医学杂志, 2017, 22(5): 464-466.
[11] Monahan H, Gunderson T, Greene E, et al. Risk factors associated with significant bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies: a review of 2204 cases[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019, 44(6): 2316-2322.
[12] Mejía-Vilet J M, Márquez-Martínez M A, Cordova-Sanchez B M, et al. Simple risk score for prediction of haemorrhagic complications after a percutaneous renal biopsy[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2018, 23(6): 523-529.
[13] Lees J S, McQuarrie E P, Mordi N, et al. Risk factors for bleeding complications after nephrologist-performed native renal biopsy[J]. Clin Kidney J, 2017, 10(4): 573-577.
[14] Pombas B, Rodríguez E, Sánchez J, et al. Risk factors associated with major complications after ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys[J]. Kidney Blood Press Res, 2020, 45(1): 122-130.
[15] Hogan J J, Mocanu M, Berns J S. The native kidney biopsy: update and evidence for best practice[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 11(2): 354-362.
[16] Mejía-Vilet J M, Márquez-Martínez M A, Cordova-Sanchez B M, et al. Simple risk score for prediction of haemorrhagic complications after a percutaneous renal biopsy[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2018, 23(6): 523-529.
[17] Nance M E, Tarim A O, Van N, et al. Risk factors for major hemorrhage following percutaneous image-guided renal biopsy: what is the “core” of the problem? A retrospective case-control study[J]. J Clin Imaging Sci, 2020, 10: 54.
[18] Xu S H, Xiong B, Lin S F, et al. Predictors of perirenal haematoma post-percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy[J]. J Int Med Res, 2021, 49(11): 3000605211058377.

超声引导下经皮肾穿刺活检后出血的危险因素

Analysis of risk factors associated with bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马晓桃, 张亚妮, 崔晨凯, 郭昭, 郭萌, 石玥, 吴瑶, 赵莉, 刘静, 赵纬昊, 付荣国, 田李芳. 不同病理类型及组织特点对肾活检后出血的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(5): 700-706.
[2]	于天宇, 姜世敏, 高红梅, 邹古明, 李文歌. 糖尿病肾病慢性肾脏病4期患者肾脏临床及病理因素与预后的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(5): 707-712.
[3]	张颖, 段华. 宫腔镜在子宫内膜癌高危因素评估中的应用进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 214-218.
[4]	刘晨, 吴龙, 蒋宏传, 李杰, 刘军, 王淑珍. 乳腺癌术后并发妇科生殖道恶性肿瘤的高危因素分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(1): 92-96.
[5]	冯轶;蔺莉. 自发性早产高危因素的分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2012, 33(1): 45-49.
[6]	刘彤;王凤英;周齐;刘维靖;幺宏彦. 新生儿窒息与产科高危因素的临床分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2005, 26(5): 624-626.
[7]	周莉;吴连方. 40例植入性胎盘的回顾性分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2005, 26(1): 90-92.