幕上胶质瘤患者瘤周水肿与镇静药物诱发神经功能缺陷之间的关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2023.03.017

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 470-474.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2023.03.017

幕上胶质瘤患者瘤周水肿与镇静药物诱发神经功能缺陷之间的关系

林楠*，张星月，马婷婷，殷雪珂，李学斌

首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院麻醉科，北京 100070

收稿日期:2022-10-13 出版日期:2023-06-21 发布日期:2023-06-08
通讯作者: 林楠 E-mail:linnan127@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（81701038），北京市科学技术委员会资助（Z191100006619069）

Relationship between peritumoral edema and sedative-induced neurological deficits in patients with supratentorial glioma

Lin Nan^*, Zhang Xingyue, Ma Tingting, Yin Xueke, Li Xuebin

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China

Received:2022-10-13 Online:2023-06-21 Published:2023-06-08
Supported by:
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth Program) (81701038)， Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z191100006619069).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察幕上胶质瘤水肿程度与镇静诱发神经功能缺陷之间的关系，为探索胶质瘤对网络功能连接的影响提供参考。方法研究回顾性纳入头部磁共振诊断为幕上胶质瘤（额－颞－顶区域）且经术后病理确定为胶质瘤的患者。采集患者瘤周水肿程度，以Steinhoff分级划分；以术前镇静诱发的神经功能缺陷作为对病变大脑的药物应激测试，神经功能评估采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表（National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale，NIHSS）进行，分为2组，即镇静后变化阳性（NIHSS改变≥2分）及阴性（NIHSS改变<2分）组。分析Steinhoff分级与镇静诱发神经功能缺陷的关系。结果在纳入的76例患者中，术前镇静药物应激测试中呈现阳性的患者共32例（42.1%），术前Steinhoff分级与测试结果没有相关性（Ⅰ级: 34.4% vs 40.9%; Ⅱ级: 43.8% vs 38.6%; Ⅲ级: 21.9% vs 20.5%, P =0.842）。肿瘤世界卫生组织（World Health Organization, WHO）分级显著影响测试的结果，高级别胶质瘤患者在镇静药物应激测试中呈现阳性反应的比例显著高于低级别胶质瘤（Ⅱ级: 40.6% vs 70.5%; Ⅲ~Ⅳ级: 59.4% vs 29.5%, P=0.009）。另外，测试呈阳性的患者住院花费显著升高［6.65 (4.11,10.30)万元 vs 4.49 (3.46,7.13)万元, P =0.006］，且这类患者术后卡氏功能状态（Karnofsky Performance Status, KPS）评分有较低倾向（P=0.052）。结论幕上胶质瘤患者瘤周水肿的程度与镇静药物诱发的神经缺陷阳性率之间无显著关联。但药物应激测试呈现阳性的患者住院花费显著增高，术后功能状态也相对较差。

关键词: 胶质瘤, 瘤周水肿, 镇静药物, 神经功能

Abstract: Objective The study is to observe the relationship between the degree of peritumoral edema in supratentorial gliomas and sedation-induced neurological deficits to provide a reference for exploring the impact of gliomas on the functional connectivity of brain networks. Methods The study retrospectively included patients with supratentorial gliomas (frontal-temporal-parietal region) diagnosed by brain magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were also confirmed as gliomas by postoperative pathology. The Steinhoff grade of peritumoral edema was recorded, and sedative-induced neurological deficits as a brain stress test were evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change. The NIHSS score change after sedation was defined as positive change (NIHSS change ≥ 2 points) and negative change (NIHSS change<2 points). The association between Steinhoff grades and sedative-induced neurological deficits was analyzed. Results Of the 76 patients enrolled, 32 (42.1%) were positive on preoperative sedative stress tests, and preoperative Steinhoff classification was not associated with test results (grade Ⅰ: 34.4% vs 40.9%; grade Ⅱ: 43.8% vs 38.6%; grade Ⅲ: 21.9% vs 20.5%, P=0.842). Patients with high-grade glioma had significant higher incidence of positive change in the brain stress test(grade Ⅱ: 40.6% vs 70.5%; grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ: 59.4% vs 29.5%, P=0.009). In addition, hospitalization costs were significantly higher in patients with positive changes ［6.65 (4.11－10.30) thousand Yuan vs 4.49 (3.46－7.13) thousand Yuan, P =0.006］, and such patients tended to have lower postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores (P=0.052). Conclusion There was no significant association between the degree of peritumoral edema in patients with supratentorial glioma and the positive rate of sedative-induced neurological deficits. However, patients with positive changes in brain stress tests by sedation had significantly higher hospitalization costs and poor postoperative functional status.

Key words: glioma, peritumoral edema, sedatives, neurological function

中图分类号:

林楠, 张星月, 马婷婷, 殷雪珂, 李学斌. 幕上胶质瘤患者瘤周水肿与镇静药物诱发神经功能缺陷之间的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(3): 470-474.

Lin Nan, Zhang Xingyue, Ma Tingting, Yin Xueke, Li Xuebin. Relationship between peritumoral edema and sedative-induced neurological deficits in patients with supratentorial glioma[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2023, 44(3): 470-474.

参考文献

［1］Bryszewski B, Tybor K, Ormezowska E A, et al. Rearrangement of motor centers and its relationship to the neurological status of low-grade glioma examined on pre- and postoperative fMRI［J］. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2013, 115(12): 2464－2470.
［2］Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders［J］. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2015, 16(3): 159－172.
［3］Duffau H. Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity［J］. Lancet Neurol, 2005, 4(8): 476－486.
［4］Horien C, Greene A S, Constable R T, et al. Regions and connections: complementary approaches to characterize brain organization and function［J］. Neuroscientist, 2020, 26(2): 117－133.
［5］Lin N, Han R Q, Zhou J X, et al. Mild sedation exacerbates or unmasks focal neurologic dysfunction in neurosurgical patients with supratentorial brain mass lesions in a drug-specific manner［J］. Anesthesiology, 2016, 124(3): 598－607.
［6］Lin N, Han R Q, Hui X, et al. Midazolam sedation induces upper limb coordination deficits that are reversed by flumazenil in patients with eloquent area gliomas［J］. Anesthesiology, 2019, 131(1): 36－45.
［7］Louis D N, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary［J］. Neuro Oncol, 2021, 23(8): 1231－1251.
［8］Kwah L K, Diong J. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)［J］. J Physiother, 2014, 60(1): 61.
［9］Chernik D A, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observers Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam［J］. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 1990, 10(4): 244－251.
［10］Steinhoff H, Grumme T, Kazner E, et al. Axial transverse computerized tomography in 73 glioblastomas［J］. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1978, 42(1/2): 45－56.
［11］马婷婷, 张星月, 彭宇明, 等. 修订版美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评估幕上占位患者镇静相关局部神经功能缺陷的诊断价值［J］. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2021, 42(10): 1046－1049.
［12］Stark A M, Stepper W, Mehdorn H M. Outcome evaluation in glioblastoma patients using different ranking scores: KPS, GOS, mRS and MRC［J］. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 2010, 19(1): 39－44.
［13］Roth P, Regli L, Tonder M, et al. Tumor-associated edema in brain cancer patients: pathogenesis and management［J］. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2013, 13(11): 1319－1325.
［14］Claassen J A H R, Thijssen D H J, Panerai R B, et al. Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation［J］. Physiol Rev, 2021, 101(4): 1487－1559.
［15］Rizk A A, Venkatraghavan L, Shankar J J S, et al. Reappearance of neurological deficits in pathologic brain: are sedatives and opioids culprits? A systematic review［J］. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2022, 34(1): 14－20.
［16］Lazar R M, Berman M F, Festa J R, et al. GABAergic but not anti-cholinergic agents re-induce clinical deficits after stroke［J］. J Neurol Sci, 2010, 292(1/2): 72－76.
［17］ Zhou X Y, Li Y W, Lenahan C, et al. Glymphatic system in the central nervous system, a novel therapeutic direction against brain edema after stroke［J］. Front Aging Neurosci, 2021, 13: 698036.
［18］ Liu K W, Zhu J, Chang Y, et al. Attenuation of cerebral edema facilitates recovery of glymphatic system function after status epilepticus［J］. JCI Insight, 2021, 6(17): e151835.
［19］Tamura M, Muragaki Y, Saito T, et al. Strategy of surgical resection for glioma based on intraoperative functional mapping and monitoring［J］. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2015, 55(5): 383－398.
［20］林楠, 周建新, 韩如泉. 轻度镇静对幕上占位病人神经功能的影响与头部磁共振表现的相关因素分析［J］. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(2): 313－319.

[1]	刘秀, 李文才. UNC0379对胶质瘤细胞增殖影响的初步探索[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(5): 741-746.
[2]	王凯, 袁磊磊, 陈谦, 艾林. 脑胶质瘤新型放射性示踪剂的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(4): 511-516.

幕上胶质瘤患者瘤周水肿与镇静药物诱发神经功能缺陷之间的关系

Relationship between peritumoral edema and sedative-induced neurological deficits in patients with supratentorial glioma

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价