中医五行人之火行人与水行人认知功能差异比较研究

doi:10. 3969/ j. issn. 1006-7795. 2024. 01. 018

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 111-117.doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 1006-7795. 2024. 01. 018

中医五行人之火行人与水行人认知功能差异比较研究

段宇航^1,2，吕宏蓬^1,2，滕飞^1,2，戴芷晴^1,2，林锦^1,2，贾竑晓^1,2*

1.首都医科大学附属北京安定医院国家精神疾病医学中心国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心精神疾病诊断与治疗北京市重点实验室，北京 100088；2.人脑保护高精尖创新中心，首都医科大学，北京 100069

收稿日期:2023-12-25 出版日期:2024-02-21 发布日期:2024-03-22
通讯作者: 贾竑晓 E-mail:jhxlj@ccmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（82305193），北京市医院管理中心临床医学发展专项（ZYLX202129），北京医院管理中心登峰人才项目（DFL20191901）。

A comparative study on the differences in cognitive functions between Fire Element and Water Element among the Five Element people

Duan Yuhang^1,2, Lyu Hongpeng^1,2, Teng Fei^1,2, Dai Zhiqing^1,2, Lin Jin^1,2, Jia Hongxiao^1,2*

1．Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University，Beijing 100088，China; 2． Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection，Capital Medical University，Beijing 100069，China

Received:2023-12-25 Online:2024-02-21 Published:2024-03-22
Supported by:
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82305193), Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (ZYLX202129), Beijing Hospitals Authority's Ascent Plan (DFL20191901).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的基于五行理论探究中医五行人中火行人与水行人的认知功能及加工过程差异性，为进一步丰富中医五行人理论内涵、推进我国本土化人格理论模型提供基础。方法在招募的受试者中根据前期制订的《中医五行（形）人面部表型分类量化规范》筛选出典型的火行人与水行人，采用成套重复性神经心理测查工具（Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, RBANS）和Top-down及Bottom-up认知心理测查范式对其认知功能进行测评。采用独立样本t检验对两组受试者的认知功能进行差异性分析。结果招募受试者火行人24人，水行人20人，与水行人组相比，火行人组在注意功能维度得分明显更高，在RBANS各部分得分上数字广度和编码测验任务得分更高；火行人组在Bottom-up认知心理测查范式的长时认知加工过程中的反应时更短、准确率更高，水行人在Bottom-up认知心理测查范式的短时加工准确率差值更低，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论中医五行人中火行人更易高度集中注意力，更易被线索所吸引，但注意力的维持时间较短，同时水行人在注意力反应时间更长，更不易被线索所影响，且注意力稳定性更强。

关键词: 中医五行人, 认知功能, 自上而下, 自下而上

Abstract: Objective To investigate the cognitive functions and processing disparities between individuals dominated by the Fire Element and those dominated by the Water Element, based on the theory of the Five Elements in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The objective is to lay a foundation for further enriching the theoretical framework of TCM's Five Elements theory and advancing the development of a localized personality theory model in China. Methods Participants were recruited and screened by using the previously devised “Quantitative Standard for Facial Phenotypic Classification of TCM Five Elements People” to identify typical individuals dominated by the Fire and Water Elements. Cognitive performance was assessed by using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) cognitive function assessment tool, along with the Top-down and Bottom-up cognitive psychological test paradigms. Independent sample t-tests were employed to analyze cognitive function differences between the two participant groups. Results Of the recruited participants, 24 were classified as Fire Element individuals and 20 as Water Element individuals. In comparison to the Water Element group, the Fire Element group exhibited significantly higher scores in the attention function dimension. In RBANS cognitive tasks, the Fire Element group achieved higher scores in digit span and coding tasks. In the Bottom-up cognitive psychological test paradigm, the Fire Element group displayed shorter reaction times and higher accuracy in long-term cognitive processing. In contrast, Water Element individuals demonstrated a statistically significant negative difference in accuracy in short-term processing (P < 0.05). Conclusion In the Five elements of traditional Chinese medicine, the Five Elements group is more likely to be highly focused and attracted by the cue, but the attention maintenance time is shorter. At the same time, the Water Elements group has a longer attention reaction time, is less likely to be affected by the cue, and the attention stability is stronger.

Key words: traditional Chinese medicine five element people, cognitive function, Top-down, Bottom-up

中图分类号:

R749

段宇航, 吕宏蓬, 滕飞, 戴芷晴, 林锦, 贾竑晓. 中医五行人之火行人与水行人认知功能差异比较研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(1): 111-117.

Duan Yuhang, Lyu Hongpeng, Teng Fei, Dai Zhiqing, Lin Jin, Jia Hongxiao. A comparative study on the differences in cognitive functions between Fire Element and Water Element among the Five Element people[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2024, 45(1): 111-117.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://journal03.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_sdykdxxb/CN/10. 3969/ j. issn. 1006-7795. 2024. 01. 018

https://journal03.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_sdykdxxb/CN/Y2024/V45/I1/111

参考文献

［1］Li J J, Yang X Y, Zhang H J, et al. The psychosomatic traits of “people with the five elements in traditional Chinese medicine”: a qualitative study［J］. Biomed Environ Sci, 2023, 36(11): 1068-1078.
［2］Mccrae R R, Costa P T J. Personality trait structure as a human universal［J］. Am Psychol, 1997, 52(5): 509-516.
［3］Stanek K C, Ones D S.Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability［J］. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2023, 120(23): e2212794120.
［4］Olaru G, Laukka E J, Dekhtyar S, et al. Association between personality traits, leisure activities, and cognitive levels and decline across 12 years in older adults［J］. Psychol Aging, 2023, 38(4): 277-290.
［5］Bainbridge T F, Ludeke S G, Smillie L D.Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales［J］. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2022, 122(4): 749-777.
［6］Vartanian O, Wertz C J, Flores R A, et al. Structural correlates of openness and intellect: implications for the contribution of personality to creativity［J］. Hum Brain Mapp, 2018, 39(7): 2987-2996.
［7］崔笛. 中医阴阳五行人体质辨识方案方法研究［D］. 成都: 成都中医药大学, 2018.
［8］路漫漫. 《黄帝内经》五形人体质理论及应用研究［D］. 沈阳: 辽宁中医药大学, 2020.
［9］Sutin A R, Stephan Y, Luchetti M, et al. Five-factor model personality traits and cognitive function in five domains in older adulthood［J］. BMC Geriatr,2019, 19(1):343.
［10］首都医科大学附属北京安定医院（北京市心理卫生中心中国药物依赖治疗中心）. 中医五行（形）人面部表型分类量化规范［EB/OL］.(2022-12-29)［2023-12-17］.https://www.ccopyright.com.cn/publicInquiry.html.
［11］Posner M, Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting［J］. Attention and Performance, 1984, 32: 531-556.
［12］Prime D J, Visser T A W, Ward L M. Reorienting attention and inhibition of return［J］. Percept Psychophys, 2006, 68(8): 1310-1323.
［13］李海玉, 潘桂娟. 中医 “火” 的理论溯源［J］. 辽宁中医杂志, 2009, 36(1): 45-48.
［14］李佳佳, 贾竑晓, Jing-Dong J Han, 等. 中医五形人“火形人”之亚型内涵解析［J］. 中华中医药杂志, 2023, 38(11): 5564-5567.
［15］Shura R D, Brearly T W, Rowland J A, et al. RBANS validity indices: a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］. Neuropsychol Rev, 2018, 28(3): 269-284.
［16］Randolph C, Tierney M C, Mohr E, et al. The repeatable battery for the assessmentof neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity［J］. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 1998, 20(3): 310-319.
［17］Griffin A S, Guillette L M, Healy S D. Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field［J］. Trends Ecol Evol, 2015, 30(4): 207-214.
［18］Dougherty L R, Guillette L M. Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis［J］. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2018, 373(1756): 20170282.
［19］Guillette L M, Hahn A H, Hoeschele M, et al. Individual differences in learning speed, performance accuracy and exploratory behaviour in black-capped chickadees［J］. Anim Cogn, 2015, 18(1): 165-178.

中医五行人之火行人与水行人认知功能差异比较研究

A comparative study on the differences in cognitive functions between Fire Element and Water Element among the Five Element people

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价