应激性高血糖比值对急性心肌梗死患者院内不良预后的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2024.03.018

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 494-500.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2024.03.018

应激性高血糖比值对急性心肌梗死患者院内不良预后的影响

董征, 杨青苗, 郭彩霞^*

首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院心血管中心，北京 100176

收稿日期:2023-05-15 出版日期:2024-06-21 发布日期:2024-06-13
通讯作者: 郭彩霞 E-mail:cxgbb@163.com
基金资助:
首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院青年杰出人才基金项目（2021-YJJ-ZZL-001）。

Effect of stress hyperglycemic ratio on poor in-hospital prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Dong Zheng, Yang Qingmiao, Guo Caixia^*

Department of Cardiovascular Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100176, China

Received:2023-05-15 Online:2024-06-21 Published:2024-06-13
Supported by:
This study was supported by Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University Young Outstanding Talents Fund（2021-YJJ-ZZL-001）.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨应激性高血糖比值（stress hyperglycemia ratio, SHR）对急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction, AMI)患者院内主要不良心血管事件（major adverse cardiovascular events, MACEs）的预测价值。方法回顾性分析2022年1月至2022年12月在首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院心血管中心住院，资料完整的AMI患者共442例。根据入院测得的第一个静脉随机血糖（admission blood glucose, ABG）和糖化血红蛋白（glycosylated hemoglobin, HbA1c）值计算得出SHR。根据是否发生院内MACEs分为MACEs组（n=79）和非MACEs组（n=363）。采用多因素Logistic回归分析探讨AMI患者院内MACEs发生的危险因素。应用受试者工作特征（receiver operating characteristic, ROC）曲线评估SHR对院内MACEs发生的预测价值。结果院内MACEs组的SHR显著高于非MACEs组（1.30±0.44 vs 1.15±0.17, P<0.001）。多因素Logistic回归分析中，SHR是AMI患者院内MACEs发生的危险因素（OR=2.69, 95%CI: 1.26~5.73, P=0.011）。ROC曲线分析结果显示，SHR对AMI患者院内MACEs有预测价值（AUC=0.63, 95%CI: 0.57~0.70, P<0.001），最佳截断值为1.29，预测价值高于HbA1c（P=0.011）。结论 SHR是AMI患者院内MACEs发生的危险因素，对院内MACEs有预测价值，最佳截断值为1.29，优于HbA1c。

关键词: 应激性高血糖比值, 高血糖, 急性心肌梗死, 主要不良心血管事件

Abstract: Objective To explore the predictive value of stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) on in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods A total of 442 AMI patients with complete clinical data from January 2021 to December 2022 in the Department of Cardiology Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital were selected for retrospectively analyzed. SHR was calculated from the first blood glucose within 24 h after admission (ABG)and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value. Patients were divided into MACEs group (n=79) and non-MACEs group (n=363) according to in-hospital MACEs. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for in-hospital MACEs. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze SHR' s predictive value.Results SHR in MACEs group was higher than that in non-MACEs group (1.30±0.44 vs 1.15±0.17, P<0.001). Multiple Logistic regression analysis indicated that elevated SHR level was an independent risk factor for in-hospital MACEs in AMI patients (OR=2.69, 95%CI: 1.26－5.73, P=0.011). ROC curve analysis showed that SHR (AUC=0.63, 95%CI: 0.57－0.70, P<0.001) had a certain predictive value for in-hospital MACEs in AMI patients, with the optimal cut-off value of 1.29, which is better than HbA1c (P=0.011). Conclusion SHR is a risk factor for in-hospital MACEs in AMI patients, and has predictive value for in-hospital MACEs, which is better than HbA1c. The optimal cut-off value is 1.29.

Key words: stress hyperglycemia ratio, hyperglycemia, acute myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events

中图分类号:

董征, 杨青苗, 郭彩霞. 应激性高血糖比值对急性心肌梗死患者院内不良预后的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(3): 494-500.

Dong Zheng, Yang Qingmiao, Guo Caixia. Effect of stress hyperglycemic ratio on poor in-hospital prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2024, 45(3): 494-500.

参考文献

［1］ Castro-Dominguez Y, Dharmarajan K, McNamara R L. Predicting death after acute myocardial infarction［J］. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 2018, 28(2): 102－109.
［2］ Vogel B, Claessen B E, Arnold S V, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction［J］. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2019, 5(1): 39.
［3］ Eddy D, Schlessinger L, Kahn R, et al. Relationship of insulin resistance and related metabolic variables to coronary artery disease: a mathematical analysis［J］. Diabetes Care, 2009, 32(2): 361－366.
［4］中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2022概要［J］. 中国循环杂志, 2023, 38(6): 583－612.
［5］ Yancy C W, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines［J］. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(16): e147-e239.
［6］ Cui C Y, Zhou M G, Cheng, et al. Admission hyperglycemia as an independent predictor of long-term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction patients without diabetes: a retrospective study［J］. J Diabetes Investig, 2020, 12(7): 1244－1251.
［7］ Khalfallah M, Abdelmageed R, Elgendy E, et al. Incidence, predictors and outcomes of stress hyperglycemia in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention［J］. Diab Vasc Dis Res, 2020, 17(1): 1479164119883983.
［8］ Keeley E C, Boura J A, Grines C L. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials［J］. Lancet, 2003, 361(9351): 13－20.
［9］ Khalfallah M, Maria D A, Allaithy A. Impact of stress hyperglycemia on No-Reflow phenomenon in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention［J］. Glob Heart, 2022, 17(1): 23.
［10］ Gao S D, Liu Q B, Ding X S, et al. Predictive value of the acute-to-chronic glycemic ratio for in-hospital outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention［J］. Angiology, 2020, 71(1): 38－47.
［11］ Dungan K M, Braithwaite S S, Preiser J C. Stress hyperglycaemia［J］. Lancet, 2009, 373(9677): 1798－1807.
［12］ Roberts G W, Quinn S J, Valentine N, et al. Relative hyperglycemia, a marker of critical illness: introducing the stress hyperglycemia ratio［J］. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2015, 100(12): 4490－4497.
［13］ Marenzi G, Cosentino N, Milazzo V, et al. Prognostic value of the acute-to-chronic glycemic ratio at admission in acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study［J］. Diabetes Care, 2018, 41(4): 847－853.
［14］ Sia C H, Chan M H H, Zheng H L, et al. Optimal glucose, HbA1c, glucose-HbA1c ratio and stress-hyperglycaemia ratio cut-off values for predicting 1-year mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic acute myocardial infarction patients［J］. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2021, 20(1): 211.
［15］ Schmitz T, Freuer D, Harmel E, et al. Prognostic value of stress hyperglycemia ratio on short- and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction［J］. Acta Diabetol, 2022, 59(8): 1019－1029.
［16］ Xu W, Yang Y M, Zhu J, et al. Predictive value of the stress hyperglycemia ratio in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from a multi-center observational study［J］. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2022, 21(1): 48.
［17］ Thygesen K, Alpert J S, Jaffe A S, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018)［J］. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 72(18): 2231－2264.
［18］ Joubert M, Hardouin J, Legallois D, et al. Effects of glycaemic variability on cardiac remodelling after reperfused myocardial infarction: evaluation of streptozotocin-induced diabetic Wistar rats using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging［J］. Diabetes Metab, 2016, 42(5): 342－350.
［19］ Chattopadhyay S, George A, Jonh J, et al. Two-hour post-challenge glucose is a better predictor of adverse outcome after myocardial infarction than fasting or admission glucose in patients without diabetes［J］. Acta Diabetol, 2018, 55(5): 449－458.
［20］ Lee T F, Burt M G, Heilbronn L K, et al. Relative hyperglycemia is associated with complications following an acute myocardial infarction: a post-hoc analysis of HI-5 data［J］. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2017, 16(1): 157.
［21］ Lv J X, Wang C S, Gao X J, et al. Development and validation of dynamic models to predict postdischarge mortality risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry［J］. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(3): e069505.
［22］ Tang, EW, Wong, et al. Global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post acute coronary syndrome［J］. Am Heart J, 2007, 153(1): 29－35.
［23］ Vicent L, Velásquez-Rodríguez J, Valero M M J, et al. Predictors of high Killip class after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary reperfusion［J］. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 248: 46－50.
［24］ Pan W J, Lu H N, Lian B T, et al. Prognostic value of HbA1c for in-hospital and short-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2019, 18(1): 169.

[1]	周力, 朱超, 王福财, 崔贺贺, 刘青波, 赵慧强, 陈晖. 药物涂层球囊在急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入术中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(4): 669-675.
[2]	罗晓萌, 江雪, 杜凤和, 郭彩霞. 急性冠状动脉综合征患者血浆sRAGE、IFN-γ浓度及其与冠状动脉病变严重程度的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 272-279.

应激性高血糖比值对急性心肌梗死患者院内不良预后的影响

Effect of stress hyperglycemic ratio on poor in-hospital prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价