首都医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1023-1028.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2024.06.012

• 脑血管病的基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚麻醉对脑血管内手术的老年患者术后谵妄的影响

刘  扬,  高  超,  王小杰,  张  梁,  吴安石*   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院麻醉科,北京 100020
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-02 出版日期:2024-12-21 发布日期:2024-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 吴安石 E-mail:wuanshi88@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82071176)。

Effect of remimazolam and propofol on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing cerebral endovascular surgery

Liu Yang, Gao Chao, Wang Xiaojie, Zhang Liang, Wu Anshi*   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University,  Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2024-09-02 Online:2024-12-21 Published:2024-12-18
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071176).

摘要: 目的  比较瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚两种麻醉药对脑血管内手术的老年患者术后谵妄的发生是否存在差别。方法  选取2023年6月至2024年4月,在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院择期行脑血管内手术的老年患者,采用随机数字表法将患者分为瑞马唑仑麻醉组(R组)和丙泊酚麻醉组(P组),共纳入106例患者,每组53例。主要研究指标为拔管后30 min至术后7d谵妄 (postoperative delirium,POD)发生率。次要研究指标为麻醉时低血压、心动过缓发生率、血管活性药物使用率、拮抗药氟马西尼使用剂量、麻醉苏醒时间、延迟拔管发生率及术后48 h患者恢复质量[采用术后康复质量15条(Quality of Recovery-15,QoR-15)问卷评估]。结果  共有103例患者(R组51例,P组52例)完成研究。R组和P组术后7d内POD发生率分别为5.88% 和3.85%,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。R组术中低血压和心动过缓发生率(19.60%, 9.80%)较P组(53.85%, 25.00%)显著降低,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.001 3,P=0.042)。R组术中去甲肾上腺素和麻黄素使用率明显低于P组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.020, P=0.033, )。两组患者麻醉苏醒时间、拔管时间和氟马西尼使用剂量的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后48 h QoR-15评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论  对接受脑血管内手术的老年患者,与丙泊酚相比,瑞马唑仑不增加术后谵妄发生率,不增加麻醉苏醒和拔管时间,血流动力学更稳定,也不影响患者恢复质量。

关键词: 瑞马唑仑, 脑血管内手术, 术后谵妄

Abstract: Objective  To compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients undergoing cerebral endovascular surgery. Methods  A controlled clinical trial was conducted on patients who underwent cerebral endovascular surgery in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2023 to April 2024. The patients were divided into remimazolam group (group R) and propofol group (group P). A total of 106 patients were included, with 53 in each group. The primary outcome was the incidence of POD from 30 min to 7 days after extubation between the two groups. The secondary outcomes included  the  time to recovery from anesthesia, the incidence of delayed extubation, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events, the use of vasoactive drugs and the antagonist flumazenil, and the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire at 48 h after surgery. Results A total of 103 patients (51 in group R and 52 in group P)  finally completed in the study. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of POD (5.88% vs 3.85%) between the two groups within 7 days after surgery (P >0.05). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia was significantly lower in group R (19.60%, 9.80%) than in group P (53.85%, 25.00%) (P =0.001 3,P =0.042). Compared with that in group P, the number of cases using norepinephrine and ephedrine,  in group R was significantly lower (P =0.020, P =0.033). There was no statistical difference in the time to recovery from anesthesia and  dose not increase the dosage of flumazenil antagonists between the two groups (P >0.05). There was no statistical difference in QoR-15 at 48 h after surgery between the two groups (P >0.05). Conclusions  The anesthetization with remimazolam show more stable hemodynamics dose not prolong  the time to recovery from anesthesia and  does not increase  the incidence of POD in elderly patients undergoing cerebral endovascular surgery.

Key words: remimazolam, cerebral endovascular surgery, postoperative delirium (POD)

中图分类号: