首都医科大学学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 53-57.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2015.01.010

• 血管外科专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

下腔静脉滤器血栓形成局部置管溶栓与外周静脉溶栓治疗的比较

田轩1, 王盛1, 刘建龙2, 陈忠1   

  1. 1. 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院血管科 北京市心肺血管疾病研究所 首都医科大学血管外科学系, 北京 100029;
    2. 北京积水潭医院血管外科, 北京 100035
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-15 出版日期:2015-02-21 发布日期:2015-01-31
  • 通讯作者: 陈忠 E-mail:chenzhong8658@vip.sina.com

A prospective clinical study on the efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis in Deep Venous Thrombosis subjects with stent

Tian Xuan1, Wang Sheng1, Liu Jianlong2, Chen Zhong1   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases; Department of Vascular Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China;
    2. Deportment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2014-11-15 Online:2015-02-21 Published:2015-01-31

摘要: 目的 对比局部置管溶栓和外周静脉溶栓治疗在下腔静脉滤器血栓形成中的溶栓疗效,缩短滤器植入时间,提高滤器取出率,降低滤器永久植入后中远期合并症.方法 采用单中心前瞻性研究的方法,收集2013年2月至2014年8月期间北京积水潭医院血管外科收治的创伤性下肢骨折合并深静脉血栓并放置可回收性腔静脉滤器(OptEase)的患者,下腔静脉造影或彩超发现滤器下血栓≥1.0 cm者,采用随机数字表法分组,进行外周溶栓或导管溶栓治疗,对滤器的取出率进行对比分析讨论.结果 外周溶栓组30例,滤器取出11例,取出率36.7%,导管溶栓组30例,滤器取出24例,取出率80.0%,导管溶栓组取出率明显高于外周溶栓取出率(P<0.05);两组间溶栓治疗后血栓大小变化的对比,导管溶栓组的溶栓效果优于外周溶栓组(P<0.05).滤器取出后无再发肺栓塞表现.结论 在下腔静脉滤器血栓形成中局部置管溶栓效果明显优于外周静脉溶栓治疗.

关键词: 深静脉血栓形成, 滤器, 溶栓治疗, 尿激酶

Abstract: Objective To assess the effectiveness of improving the filter retrieval rate by catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis in patients presented with stent thrombosis after inferior vena cava filters implantation. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, parallel group, single-center clinical study conducted in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Sixty subjects implanted with OptEase retrievable filters due to deep venous thrombosis (DVT) secondary to traumatic lower limb fracture seen from February 2013 to August 2014 were enrolled in this study. All subjects were diagnosed with stent thrombosis at least 1.0 cm in diameter by infeior vena cava angiography or color Doppler ultrasound. Subjects were randomized to receive catheter-directed thrombolysis or peripheral intravenous thrombolysis for six days. The primary study endpoint was the filter retrieval rate. Results The filter retrieval rate was 80% (24/30) in catheter-directed thrombolysis group compared with 36.7% (11/30) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The efficacy of thrombolysis was superior in the catheter-direct thrombolysis group based on the change of the size of thrombus after treatment compared to the baseline (P<0.05). No subjects experienced pulmonary embolism in follow-up period. Conclusion Compared with systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis provided better efficacy in terms of increasing the rate of filter retrieval after stent obstruction.

Key words: deep venous thrombosis, inferior vena caval filter, thrombolysis, urokinase

中图分类号: