腹腔镜Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建改善高风险组前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2016.03.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨腹腔镜Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建技术对高风险组前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的疗效。方法纳入2011年1月至2015年9月于本院治疗的高风险前列腺癌患者71例,采用腹腔镜Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建技术47例,采用单纯尿道吻合技术24例,对比两组患者年龄、体质量指数、前列腺体积、术前前列腺特异性抗原(prostate specific antigen,PSA)、临床分期、手术时间、术后引流管拔除时间、术后尿管拔除时间、病理分期、Gleason评分、术后切缘阳性率、淋巴结阳性率及拔除尿管后第2、4、12、24、52周尿控恢复情况。结果两组患者间年龄、体质量指数、前列腺体积、术前PSA、临床分期、病理分期、Gleason评分、术后切缘阳性率、淋巴结阳性率、术后引流管拔除时间的差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05);Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建组手术时间长于对照组(P=0.024)、术后尿管拔除时间显著早于对照组(P <0.001),拔除尿管第12周尿控恢复显著优于对照组(P=0.023)。结论腹腔镜Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建技术安全可行,显著改善高风险组前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控。

关键词: 腹腔镜, Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建, 前列腺癌根治术, 前列腺癌, 高风险组, 尿失禁

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of the "Sandwich" reconstruction of the urethrovesical anastomosis contributes to early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Methods From January 2011 through September 2015, 71 high-risk prostate cancer patients were involved in the study, of whom 47 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the "Sandwich" reconstruction of the urethrovesical anastomosis and 24 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with standard urethrovesical anastomosis. Outcome data including patient age, body mass index, prostate volume, preoperative prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical stage, operation time, removal of drainage tube's time, removal of catheter time, pathologic stage, lymph node dissection rate, positive surgical margins rate and urinary continence were assessed at 2, 4, 12, 24 and 52 weeks after catheter removal.Results No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of patient age, body mass index, prostate volume, preoperative prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical stage, removal of drainage tube time, lymph node dissection rate and positive surgical margins rate; The operation time of "Sandwich" reconstruction of the urethrovesical anastomosis was longer than the time of standard urethrovesical anastomosis (P=0.024). A significant difference in removal of catheter time was recorded between the two groups [(14.35±1.83) d in "Sandwich" reconstruction of the urethrovesical anastomosis vs (6.53±0.85)d in standard urethrovesical anastomosis (P <0.001)]; A significant difference of urinary continence was also recorded between the groups (50% in standard urethrovesical anastomosis vs 76.6% in "Sandwich" reconstruction of the urethrovesical anastomosis, P=0.023) after 12 weeks. Conclusion "Sandwich" reconstruction technique in the procedure of urethrovesical anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is safe and feasible, which can improve early recovery of continence for high-risk prostate cancer significantly.

Key words: laparoscopic, "Sandwich" reconstruction technique of the urethrovesical anastomosis, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, prostate cancer, high-risk, incontinence

中图分类号:

R737.25

刘志斌, 靳松, 张军晖, 王建文, 田溪泉, 田龙, 牛亦农, 邢念增. 腹腔镜Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建改善高风险组前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2016, 37(3): 313-317.

Liu Zhibin, Jin Song, Zhang Junhui, Wang Jianwen, Tian Xiquan, Tian Long, Niu Yinong, Xing Nianzeng. "Sandwich" reconstruction of the urethrovesical anastomosis contributes to early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2016, 37(3): 313-317.

参考文献

[1] 廖晓星, 邢念增, 乔鹏, 等. "三明治" 法尿道重建技术改善腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术后早期尿控的效果[J]. 北京大学学报 (医学版), 2015, 47(4): 601-604.
[2] NCCN. The NCCN prostate cancer clinical practice guidelines in oncology (version 2.2016)[EB/OL]. Fort Washington: NCCN,2016[2016-03-13]. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pd
[3] 徐亚文, 刘春晓, 郑少波, 等. 筋膜内切除法在腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010,31 (7): 482-485.
[4] Nguyen M M, Kamoi K, Stein R J, et al. Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2008, 101(9): 1135-1139.
[5] Arap W. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(2): 200-201; author reply 201-202.
[6] Lombraña M, Izquierdo L, Gómez A, et al. Impact of a nurse-run clinic on prevalence of urinary incontinence and everyday life in men undergoing radical prostatectomy[J]. J Wound Ostomy & Continence Nurs, 2013, 40(3): 309-312.
[7] Kundu S D, Roehl K A, Eggener S E, et al. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies[J]. J Urol, 2004, 172(6 Pt1): 2227-2231.
[8] Kim J J, Ha Y S, Kim J H, et al. Independent predictors of recovery of continence 3 months after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(10): 1290-1295.
[9] Eastham J A, Kattan M W, Rogers E, et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 1996, 156(5): 1707-1713.
[10] Burkhard F C, Kessler T M, Fleischmann A, et al. Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy—does it have an impact on urinary continence?[J]. J Urol, 2006, 176(1): 189-195.
[11] Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen R C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 405-417.
[12] Razi A, Yahyazadeh S R, Sedighi Gilani M A, et al. Bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy and postoperative urinary continence[J]. Urol J, 2009, 6(1): 23-26.
[13] Pettus J A, Masterson T, Sokol A, et al. Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(3): 949-955.
[14] Chlosta P L, Drewa T, Jaskulski J, et al. Bladder neck preservation during classic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy-point of technique and preliminary results[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2012, 7(2): 89-95.
[15] Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen R C, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 405-417.
[16] 李恭会, 朱世斌, 成晟, 等. 腹膜外腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术中保留膀胱颈对术后早期控尿功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34(5): 361-365.
[17] Golabek T, Jarecki P, Jaskulski J, et al. Modified technique for laparoscopic running vesicourethral anastomosis[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2014, 9(3): 357-61.
[18] Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, et al. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60(2): 320-329.
[19] Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 51(4): 996-1003.
[20] Koliakos N, Mottrie A, Buffi N, et al. Posterior and anterior fixation of the urethra during robotic prostatectomy improves early continence rates[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2010, 44(1): 5-10.
[21] Patel V R, Coelho R F, Palmer K J, et al. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 56(3): 472-478.
[22] Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, et al. Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction[J]. BJU Int, 2008, 101(7): 871-877.