经尿道针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与经尿道钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗效果和安全性比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2018.03.023

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 439-443.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2018.03.023

经尿道针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与经尿道钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗效果和安全性比较

陈思阳, 丰琅, 杜源, 杜林栋

首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院泌尿外科, 北京 100050

收稿日期:2018-03-05 出版日期:2018-05-21 发布日期:2018-06-11
通讯作者: 陈思阳 E-mail:dayoff@sina.com

Comparison of efficacy and safety of transurethral pin-shaped electrode en bloc resection of bladder tumor and transurethral holmium laser resection of bladder tumor for non muscle invasive bladder cancer

Chen Siyang, Feng Lang, Du Yuan, Du Lindong

Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China

Received:2018-03-05 Online:2018-05-21 Published:2018-06-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价经尿道针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与经尿道钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗效果和安全性。方法选取首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院自2015年3月至2017年10月收治的113例非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者，依据手术方法分为针状电极经尿道膀胱肿瘤整块切除术组（针状电极组63例）和钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术组（激光组50例）。对比两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、膀胱冲洗时间、尿管留置时间、住院时间及术后随访期复发率，所得数据进行统计学分析。结果 113例患者均成功完成手术，无中转开放手术，无输血病例，无膀胱穿孔病例。所有病例病理均可满足病理分期要求，其中Ta期31例，T1期82例。低级别尿路上皮癌77例，高级别尿路上皮癌36例。所有病例术后随访时间3~22个月，平均随访时间（11.4±5.8）个月。针状电极组肿瘤复发6例（9.5%，6/63），激光组复发7例（14%，7/50），两组均无病理分期进展者。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、膀胱冲洗时间、尿管留置时间、住院时间及术后随访期复发率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论经尿道针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌安全有效，可以有效避免由于闭孔神经反射引起的膀胱穿孔等严重合并症，切除标本满足病理分期要求。

关键词: 针状电极, 钬激光, 经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术, 整块切除, 非肌层浸润性膀胱癌

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pin-shaped electrode in the transurethral en bloc resection of bladder cancer and transurethral holmium laser resection of bladder tumor for non muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Methods One hundred and thirteen cases with non muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated in Beijing Friendship Hospital from March 2015 to October 2017 were assigned to receive transurethral resection of bladder tumor. All the cases were divided into pin-shaped electrode group(n=63) and laser group(n=50) according to the operation method. The operation time, the amount of bleeding, bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time, hospitalization time and the recurrence rate in the follow-up period were compared between the two groups, and the data were statistically analyzed.Results All the cases were successfully undergone operation.There were no cases of open surgery and no cases of blood transfusion and no cases of bladder perforation during the operation. All case pathology can meet the requirement of pathological staging. There were 31 Ta cases and 82 T1 cases. There were 77 low grade tumor cases and 36 high grade tumor cases. All patients were followed up for 3-22 months, with an average of (11.4±5.8) months. The tumor recurrence was found in 6 cases in the pin-shaped electrode group(9.5%,6/63) and 7 cases in the laser group(14%,7/50). There was no progression case during the follow up period. There was no significant difference in the operation time, the amount of bleeding, bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time, hospitalization time and the recurrence rate in the follow-up period in the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Transurethral pin-shaped electrode en bloc resection of bladder tumor is a safe and effective therapeutic method for non muscle-invasive bladder cancer.It can effectively avoid the bladder perforation caused by the obturator nerve reflex and meet the needs of postoperative pathological diagnosis.

Key words: pin-shaped electrode, holmium laser, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, en bloc resection, non muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma

中图分类号:

R699

陈思阳, 丰琅, 杜源, 杜林栋. 经尿道针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与经尿道钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗效果和安全性比较[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2018, 39(3): 439-443.

Chen Siyang, Feng Lang, Du Yuan, Du Lindong. Comparison of efficacy and safety of transurethral pin-shaped electrode en bloc resection of bladder tumor and transurethral holmium laser resection of bladder tumor for non muscle invasive bladder cancer[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2018, 39(3): 439-443.

参考文献

[1] Babjuk M,Burger M,Zigeuner R,et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder:update 2013[J].Eur Urol,2013,64(4):639-653.
[2] 张翼飞,梁朝朝.非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤的手术治疗新进展[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(1):69-71.
[3] 茹峰,王东文,张旭辉.经尿道膀胱肿瘤激光整块切除联合个体化灌注方案治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效评价[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(1):71-72.
[4] 李阿兴,谭超, 张强,等.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌肿瘤切除新趋势-整块切除[J].中国保健营养,2017,27(10):57.
[5] Bishr M,Lattouf J B,Latour M,et al. Tumour stage on re-staging transurethral resection predicts recurrence and progression-free survival of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer[J].Can Urol Assoc J,2014,8(5-6):E306-310.
[6] 张建勋,刘安,高旭,等.推剥技术在经尿道膀胱浅表肿瘤切除术中预防闭孔神经反射的作用[J].现代医药卫生,2010,26(22):3403-3404.
[7] Ukai R.Hashimoto K,Lwasa T,et al. Transurethral resection in one piece(TURBO)isan accurate too for pathological staging of bladder tumour[J].Int J Urol,2010,17(8):708-714.
[8] Karl A,Herrmann T R. En bloc resection of urothelialcancerwithin theurinary bladder:the upcoming gold standard?[J].World J Urol,2015,33(4):581-582.
[9] Kramer M W, Wohers M, Cash H. et al. Current evidence oftransurethral Ho:YAG and Tm:YAG treatment of bladder cancer:update 2014[J].World J Urol,2015,33(4):571-579.
[10] 张旭辉,王东文,杨森,等.经尿道激光膀胱肿瘤整块切除术72例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(4):326-328.
[11] 闫伟,乔庐东,杜震,等.经尿道双极等离子针状电极肿瘤整块切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱尿路上皮癌的临床分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,37(9):672-675.
[12] 张见超,孙怡,孙晓璐,等.非浸润性膀胱肿瘤采用绿激光气化术治疗的临床效果评价[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2016,23(s2):222-223.

经尿道针状电极膀胱肿瘤整块切除术与经尿道钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的治疗效果和安全性比较

Comparison of efficacy and safety of transurethral pin-shaped electrode en bloc resection of bladder tumor and transurethral holmium laser resection of bladder tumor for non muscle invasive bladder cancer

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	丁显超, 宋黎明, 瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫, 牛亦农. 二次电切对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌疗效的影响分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 84-89.
[2]	孙志鹏, 朱昱冰, 阿民布和, 樊庆, 李天雄, 张能维. 腹腔镜保脾胰体尾整块切除手术治疗胰腺癌的技术细节及预后[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(5): 733-739.
[3]	宋洋, 李鹏, 冀明, 吴永冬, 张澍田. 钬激光在消化系统疾病中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2014, 35(5): 630-633.
[4]	房波;魏威;田鸣. 靶控输注丙泊酚行钬激光输尿管镜碎石术[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2008, 29(4): 524-527.