无症状汉族人群脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数测量影响因素的探索性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.01.018

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 105-110.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.01.018

无症状汉族人群脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数测量影响因素的探索性研究

刘淼淼¹, 吕锐¹, 程薇薇^2*

1.首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院医学影像放射科, 北京 100070;
2.中国中医科学院西苑医院老年科国家中医药管理局全国老年病医疗中心,北京 100091

收稿日期:2020-08-12 出版日期:2021-02-21 发布日期:2021-02-02
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC1307700),北京市属医院科研培育项目(PX2017066)。

Measurement of sagittal parameters of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic Han population

Liu Miaomiao¹, Lyu Rui¹, Cheng Weiwei^2*

1. Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China;
2. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Xiyuan Hospital Professor Geriatrics Specialist Senior Scientific Specialist, National Geriatric Medical Center of the State Administration of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100091, China

Received:2020-08-12 Online:2021-02-21 Published:2021-02-02
Contact: ^*E-mail:weiweic_2008@126.com
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1307700), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program of China(PX2017066)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的本研究通过对无症状汉族人群脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数进行测量,建立汉族人群脊柱-骨盆参数的参考值范围,并对其影响因素性别、年龄、体质量指数等加以分析。方法选取2015年8月1日至2017年8月31日于首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院就诊患者入选的85名生活无症状汉族人群,入选者年龄为21~65岁。测量脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数,参数涵盖了骨盆入射角(pelvic incidence,PI)、骨盆倾斜角(pelvic tilt,PT)、骶骨倾斜角(sacral slope,SS)、腰椎前凸角(lumbar lordosis,LL)、胸椎后凸角(thoracic kyphosis,TK)、颈椎前凸角(cervical lordosis,CL)、脊柱矢状位平衡(sagittal vertical axis,SVA)、总腰骨盆角(lumbopelvic lordosis angle,PR-T12)、脊柱骶骨角(spino-sacral angle,SSA),以及骶骨骨盆角(sacral pelvic angle,SPA)所涉及脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数的客观评估。参数组间比较采用t检验。各参数间以及与年龄、性别、体质量指数相关性采用Pearson相关系数。结果本研究85名志愿者,男性39名、女性46名,平均年龄男性(50.9±13.2)岁和女性(41.8±13.6)岁。PI, PT, SS, LL, TK, CL, SVA, PR-T12, SSA和SPA的平均值分别为51.1°±8.2°、18.5°±8.0°、32.8°±6.3°、36.7°±11.8°、20.8°±11.3°、11.2°±9.7°、(14.9±39.6) mm、75.6°±9.8°、122.9°±7.8°、54.3°±7.1°。本研究发现年龄与PI、PT呈正相关,与LL、TK呈负相关,与SS无明显相关性。男女两组TK、CL、SVA比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。其他比较,参数差异无统计学意义。LL、TK与体质量指数有相关性,其余参数未发现与体质量指数明显相关。结论脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数与个体的年龄、种群、性别及体质量指数都有相关性,本研究结果将为临床工作提供有参考意义的数据。

关键词: 矢状位力线, 脊柱-骨盆, 中国汉族

Abstract: Objective To analysis the morphology and orientation characteristics of pelvis in normal Chinese adults and study the correlations among all the spinopelvic parameters and the correlations between these parameters and body properties like sex, age and body mass index (BMI). Methods A total of 85 asymptomatic Chinese adult volunteers from Beijing City with the age ranged from 21 to 65 years were enrolled in this study. The average age of the male were (46.0±14.1) years and the female were (41.8±13.6) years, respectively. Ten most important pelvic and spinal parameters were evaluated, which included pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), cervical lordosis(CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbopelvic lordosis angle (PR-T12), Spino-sacral angle (SSA), and sacral pelvic angle (SPA). Both the relationship among these parameters one another and the relationships between these parameters and age, sex, and BMI were assessed using the Pearson correlation analysis. Results The mean values of PI, PT, SS, LL, TK, CL, SVA, PR-T12, SSA, and SPA were51.1°±8.2°, 18.5°±8.0°, 32.8°±6.3°, 36.7°±11.8°, 20.8°±11.3°, 11.2°±9.7°,(14.9±39.6) mm, 75.6°± 9.8°, 122.9°±7.8°, 54.3°±7.1°, respectively. The results showed that the age is positively correlated with PI and PT, while negatively correlated with LL and TK. SS was correlated with ethnicity. Besides, TK, CL, and SVA were very different between the male and female groups. While LL and TK were slightly correlated with BMI. Conclusions The normal values of spinopelvic parameters were related with the age, ethnicity, sex, and BMI of the individuals. These results offered a significant reference for clinical work.

Key words: sagittal alignment, spine-pelvic, Chinese Han Nationality

中图分类号:

刘淼淼, 吕锐, 程薇薇. 无症状汉族人群脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数测量影响因素的探索性研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(1): 105-110.

Liu Miaomiao, Lyu Rui, Cheng Weiwei. Measurement of sagittal parameters of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic Han population[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2021, 42(1): 105-110.

参考文献

[1] Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, et al. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases [J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(9):1459-1467.
[2] Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, et al. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position [J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2005,30(3):346-353.
[3] Legaye J, Duval- Beaupère G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves [J]. Eur Spine J,1998, 7(2):99-103.
[4] Mac-Thiong J M, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Age-and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults [J]. Eur Spine J,2011, 20 (Suppl 5):572-577.
[5] Endo K, Suzuki H, Nishimura H, et al. Characteristics of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in Japanese young adults [J]. Asian Spine J, 2014, 8(5):599-604.
[6] Lee C S, Chung S S, Kang K C, et al. Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2011, 36(25):E1648-1654.
[7] Zhu Z, Xu L, Zhu F, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2014, 39(1):E1-6.
[8] Park S A, Kwak D S, Cho H J, et al. Changes of spinopelvic parameters in different positions [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2017, 137(9):1223-1232.
[9] Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2005, 87(2):260-267.
[10]Suzuki H, Endo K, Mizuochi J, et al. Clasped position for measurement of sagittal spinal alignment [J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(5):782-786.
[11]Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis [J]. Eur Spine J,2006,15(4):415-422.
[12]Gelb D E, Lenke L G, Bridwell K H, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995, 20(12):1351-1358.
[13]Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, et al. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18(1):40-47.
[14]Rose P S, Bridwell K H, Lenke L G, et al. Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(8):785-791.
[15]Lafage V, Ames C, Schwab F, et al. Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2012, 37(3):E180-187.
[16]Chanplakorn P, Wongsak S, Woratanarat P, et al. Lumbopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiograph of adult
volunteers and the classification in the sagittal alignment of lumbar spine [J]. European Spine J, 2010,20(5):706-712.
[17]Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, et al. Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? [J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41(1):62-68.
[18]Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, et al. Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects [J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(11):3675-3686.
[19]Banno T, Togawa D, Arima H, et al. The cohort study for the determination of reference values for spinopelvic parameters (T1 pelvic angle and global tilt) in elderly volunteers [J]. Eur Spine J, 2016,25 (11):3687-3693.
[20]Hammerberg E M, Wood K B. Sagittal profile of the elderly [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16(1):44-50.
[21]Gilsanz V, Skaggs D L, Kovanlikaya A, et al. Differential effect of race on the axial and appendicular skeletons of children [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1998, 5:1420-1427.
[22]Seeman E. Growth in bone mass and size-Are racial and gender differences in bone mineral density more apparent than real? [J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,1998, 83:1414-1419.
[23]Lonner B S, Auerbach J D, Sponseller P, et al. Variations in pelvic and other sagittal spinal parameters as a function of race in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2010, 35(10):E374-377.
[24]Janssen M M, Drevelle X, Humbert L, et al. Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2009, 34(23):E826-832.
[25]Atici Y, Akman Y E, Erdogan S, et al. The effect of growing rod lengthening technique on the sagittal spinal and the spinopelvic parameters [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(6):1148-1157.
[26]Diebo B G, Challier V, Segreto F A, et al. Impact of preopeative spinopelvic alignment on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty [J]. Spine J, 2017, 17(10):S59.

无症状汉族人群脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数测量影响因素的探索性研究

Measurement of sagittal parameters of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic Han population

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	崔维, 王磊, 麻松, 刘宝戈. 颈前路经椎间隙后缘截骨治疗退变性僵硬型颈椎后凸畸形[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(4): 497-502.
[2]	肖婧, 谢兰品, 董雅坤, 王晓明, 孙琳, 綦辉, 申阿东. 中国汉族儿童TIRAP基因单核苷酸多态性分析未显示其与结核病的易感相关[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2015, 36(4): 622-629.