首都医科大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 161-166.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2025.01.025

• 专论与综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校中文医学期刊出版伦理制度建设现况及分析

闫  红,  高  健*,  黄  芳,  张建军   

  1. 《首都医科大学学报》编辑部,北京 100069
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-14 出版日期:2025-02-21 发布日期:2025-02-25
  • 通讯作者: 高 健 E-mail:gaojian@ccmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京市高等教育学会科技期刊研究分会基金项目(BJGJ-KJQK-ZD-2024-06)。

Research on the construction of ethical system for publishing medical science and technology journals in universities

Yan Hong, Gao Jian*, Huang Fang, Zhang Jianjun   

  1. Editorial Office of Journal of Capital Medical University, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069,China
  • Received:2024-10-14 Online:2025-02-21 Published:2025-02-25
  • Supported by:
    This study supported by the Science and Technology Journal Research Branch of Beijing Higher Education Association (BJGJ-KJQK-ZD-2024-06).

摘要: 目的  调查高校中文医学期刊出版伦理制度建设现状,探讨高校中文医学期刊出版伦理制度建设方面存在的问题并提出相应的建议。方法  以2023年版《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)自然科学卷》中的55种医药大学学报类期刊为研究对象,通过期刊官网调查其出版伦理制度建设情况。结果  仅18种期刊在其官网中有明确的出版伦理栏目,涵盖作者、审稿人、编辑、出版者有关的出版伦理制度,而其他期刊只在各自官网发布的投稿指南、同行评议、相关声明中提及作者、审稿人、编辑、出版者有关的出版伦理制度,且涵盖不全,出版流程不透明。结论  高校中文医学期刊出版伦理制度建设尚不完善,应完善出版伦理制度规范,加强学术不端行为的防范与处理;加强出版伦理制度的宣传,增强作者的诚信意识;推进出版流程透明化,加强出版各流程的监督预警。

关键词: 医学科技期刊, 出版伦理, 学术不端行为, 诚信意识

Abstract: Objective  To investigate the current situation of ethical system construction in the publication of medical science and technology journals in universities, to explore the problems in the construction of ethical system in the publication of medical science and technology journals in universities, and propose corresponding suggestions. Methods  A total of 55 medical university journals included in the 2023 edition of the China Science and Technology Journal Citation Reports (Core Edition) Natural Science Volume were selected as the research subjects, and their publishing ethics system construction was investigated through the journal's official website. Results  Only 18 journals have clear publishing ethics sections on their official websites, covering publishing ethics systems related to authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers, while other journals only mention publishing ethics systems related to authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers in their submission guidelines, peer reviews, and related statements published on their respective official websites, and the coverage is incomplete and the publishing process is opaque. Conclusion  Ethical systems and strengthen the prevention and handling of academic misconduct, to strengthen the promotion of publishing ethics system and enhance the integrity awareness of authors, to promote transparency in the publishing process and strengthen supervision and to early warning of various publishing processes.

Key words: medical technology journals, publishing ethics, academic misconduct, integrity consciousness

中图分类号: