首都医科大学学报 ›› 1995, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 282-283.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同静脉径路安置埋藏式心脏起搏器246例评估

那开宪, 刘庆山, 沈潞华, 顾复生   

  1. 首都医学院附属北京友谊医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:1994-12-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1995-10-15 发布日期:1995-10-15

Evaluation of 246 Cases with Permanent Pacemaker through Different Veins

Na Kaixian, Liu Qingshan, Shen Luhua, Gu Fusheng   

  1. Department of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospilal, Capital Institute of Medicine
  • Received:1994-12-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1995-10-15 Published:1995-10-15

摘要: 自1977年起对246例患者经不同静脉径路安置埋藏式心脏起搏器。其中经头静脉径路122例,成功100例(82%),发生脱位9例(7.4%),局部感染3例(2.5%);经颈外静脉途径12例,成功11例(91.7%),导线外露局部皮肤感染2例(16.7%);经锁骨下静脉途径112例,成功109例(97.3%),发生局部感染、气胸及脱位各1例(2.7%).3者进行比较,认为锁骨下静脉应作为安置永久心脏起搏器的首选静脉(P<0.01).

关键词: 埋藏式起搏器, 静脉, 起搏导管

Abstract: 246 cases with permanent pacemaker through different veins were reported which consisted of 135 cases of men and 111 cases of women.In 122 cases cephalic vein was used with a successful rate of 82% (100 cases), dislocation of 7.4% (9 cases) and local infection of 2.5/00 (3 cases).In 12 cases external jugular vein was used with a successful rate of 91.7%(11 cases ),damage of pacing catheter and local skin infection in 2 cases.In 112 cases subclavian vein was used with a successful rate of 97.3% (109 cases), local infection ,pneumothorax and dislocation in 1 case each.

Key words: permanent pacemaker, vein, pacing lead

中图分类号: