首都医科大学学报 ›› 2002, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 66-67.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

朝阳医院和Nijmegen大学医院医师对前列腺增生性疾病病理诊断差异的比较

张鑫, 高居忠, 管德林, 许建军   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2001-03-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2002-01-15 发布日期:2002-01-15

Difference in Diagnostic Criteria of Prostatic Neoplastic Disease between China and Netherland

Zhang Xin, Gao Juzhong, Guan Delin, Xu Jianjun   

  1. Department of Urology Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hoapital, Affiliate of Capital University of Medical Sciences
  • Received:2001-03-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2002-01-15 Published:2002-01-15

摘要: 由朝阳医院和荷兰Nijmegen大学医院的医师,分别对朝阳医院1996年1至8月连续104例前列腺增生性疾病的组织病理标本,应用Gleason国际分期标准进行诊断,并比较双方诊断结果。结果94例诊断相符(90.4%);10例有一定程度差异(9.6%),其中6例有轻微差异(5.8%),4例差异较大(3.8%).结果表明对相同的病理标本双方的诊断结果没有显着性差异,为双方进一步合作探讨中国与西方国家前列腺疾病发病率差异的原因奠定了基础。

关键词: 前列腺疾病, 诊断标准, 病理诊断

Abstract: There have been many studies on prostate disease among different countries.We aimed to prove that criteria for the histological diagnosis of prostate disease were comparable in China and Netherland.Therefore we could make further study in this field between the two countries.Five pathologists from China and Netherlands individually reviewed 104 continuously collected prostate tissue specimens from pathological archive in Red Cross Chaoyang Hospital from January to August,1996. Each slide was examined by pathologists from both countries using criteria in different countries and the diagnosis was compared.Among the 104 cases, there were no discrepancies in 94. In 10 cases there were discrepancies consisting of mild discrepancies in 6 cases and severe in 4 cases.There is no significant difference in diagnostic criteria for prostate disease between China and Netherlands therefore we sould make further study in this field between the two countries.

Key words: prostate disease, diagnosis criteria, pathologic diagnosis

中图分类号: