首都医科大学学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 176-177.

• 论著·临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

结肠双对比造影术前不同导泻药清肠效果对照分析

杜兴亚, 齐忠政   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2002-04-13 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2003-04-15 发布日期:2003-04-15

Comparative Analysis of two Drugs Applied before Double Contrast Colography

Du Xingya, Qi Zhongzheng   

  1. Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Affiliate of Capital University of Medical Sciences
  • Received:2002-04-13 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2003-04-15 Published:2003-04-15

摘要: 为比较硫酸镁与番泻叶的临床应用效果及探讨两者优选问题,对结肠造影术前用硫酸镁组与番泻叶组各50例进行对照分析。结果:术前用药无明显临床反应者硫酸镁组45例(90%),番泻叶组32例(64%),前者显著高于后者(P<0.01);X线全结肠无粪便者硫酸镁组40例(80%),潘泻叶组28例(56%),前者显著优于后者(P<0.05)。提示:硫酸镁宜列为术前导泻的首选用药。

关键词: 硫酸镁, 番泻叶, 钡灌肠结肠造影

Abstract: To compare the effect of clinical application of magnesium sulfate and senna before double contrast colography, 50 patients of each group for double contrast colography were studied. The results indicated there were 45 cases (90%) without side effects and 40 cases (80%) without stool in magnesium sulfate group, while 32 cases (64%) without side effects and 28 cases (56%) without stool in the senna group. There were significant differences between the magnesium sulfate group and the senna group (all P<0.05). The results suggest magnesium sulfate and senna are both safe and suitable for double contract colography and magnesium sulfate should be the first choice.

Key words: magnesium sulfate, senna, double contrast colography

中图分类号: