首都医科大学学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 562-565.

• 专题报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

感染性休克患者的负液体平衡与预后的关系

张丽, 席修明, 姜利   

  1. 首都医科大学附属复兴医院 ICU
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-10-24 发布日期:2007-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 席修明,Correspondingauthor,E-mail:xxm2937@sina.com

Negative Fluid Balance Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Septic Shock

Zhang Li, Xi Xiuming, Jiang Li   

  1. Intensive Care Unit, Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University
  • Received:2007-07-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-10-24 Published:2007-10-24

摘要:

目的 探究感染性休克治疗的前3天患者的液体平衡状态与预后的关系。方法 采用回顾性对照研究。查看1999年1月至2003年12月收入首都医科大学附属复兴医院ICU的感染性休克患者病例记录,入选病例必须严格符合感染性休克的诊断标准,且既往无肾功能不全病史。采集病例相关数据以及诊断后第1、2、3天的液体平衡值。比较不同组别患者的急性生理和慢性健康评分(APACHEⅡ)、继发器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、液体平衡和病死率等数据。对影响患者预后的独立危险因素进行Logistic回归分析,确定和描述感染性休克患者的预后与在前3天的液体复苏治疗中出现的负平衡((0mL)相关因素的关系。结果 负液体平衡患者与未出现负液体平衡患者2组的病死率差异有统计学意义(52.4%vs87.5%,χ2=5.303,P=0.021)。通过对入组时患者年龄、APACHEⅡ评分、第1天和第3天SOFA评分和正负平衡等影响患者预后的独立危险因素Logistic回归分析,表明前3天的治疗中,若有1d出现负液体平衡即可成为影响患者预后的独立危险因素(P=0.035)。结论 在感染性休克前3天的治疗中,若有1d出现液体平衡负值即可成为影响感染性休克患者预后的独立因素,对感染性休克的28d生存预后有较强的预测性。在前3天的治疗中出现液体平衡为负值((0mL)的感染性休克患者的生存率比液体平衡为正值的患者的28d生存率高。

关键词: 感染性休克, 利尿剂, 液体平衡, 病死率

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the relationship between the negative fluid balance and outcomes in patients with septic shock.Methods This was a retrospective controled study. Medical records of 41 patients admitted to our medical ICU over a 5 year period(1999.1~2003.12) were examined. Patients with septic shock who had renal failure or required dialysis prior to hospitalization were not included. A number of demographic and physiology variables were collected from the medical records, including age, gender, MAP, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, electrolyte(K+, Na+, Cl-), pH, PaO2/FiO2, Cr, Hct, WBC, HCO3- and the intake liquid, fluid balance of the first 3 days, furosemide doses, and so on. From the variables admission APACHE Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) and daily sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA) scores were computed from the collected data. Variables were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors, and also between the patients who achieved negative(<0 mL) fluid balance in ≥1 day of the first 3 days of management and those who did not achieve negative(<0 mL) fluid balance in ≥1 day of the first 3 days of management. The Logistic regression statistics was used to determine the relationship between negative fluid balance, age, APACHE Ⅱ, SOFA scores on the first and third day and survival.Results Of the 41 patients, 29 died(<28 days), so the mortality was 71%. There was no significant difference in terms of the APACHE Ⅱ, SOFA score, age, gender, furosemide doses between survivors and nonsurvivors: so was also between patients who achieved negative(<0 mL) fluid balance in ≥1 day of the first 3 days of management and those who did not ten of 21 patients who achieved a negative balance of <0 mL on ≥1 day of the first 3 days of treatment survived, only 2 of 16 patients who failed to achieved a negative fluid balance of on ≥1 day of the first 3 days of treatment survived(52.38% vs 87.50%, χ2=5.303, P=0.021).Conclusion At least 1 day of net negative fluid balance in the first 3 days of treatment may be a good independent predictor for survival in patients with septic shock.

Key words: septic shock, diuretic, fluid balance, mortality

中图分类号: