首都医科大学学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 575-578.

• 专题报道 • 上一篇    下一篇

机械通气对急性肺损伤兔肺水肿影响的实验研究

秦志强1, 王辰2, 庞宝森2, 孙兵2, 杜敏捷2, 牛淑杰2, 龙胜泽1   

  1. 1. 广西壮族自治区人民医院呼吸内科;2. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院北京呼吸疾病研究所
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-10-24 发布日期:2007-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 王辰,Correspondingauthor,E-mail:cyh-birm@263.net

Effect of Mechanical Ventilation on Lung Edema in Rabbits with Endotoxin-induced Acute Lung Injury

Qin Zhiqiang1, Wang Chen2, Pang Baosen2, Sun Bing2, Du Minjie2, Niu Shujie2, Long Shengze1   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory Disease, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region;2. Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University
  • Received:2007-07-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-10-24 Published:2007-10-24

摘要:

目的 研究不同潮气量联合不同水平呼气末正压(PEEP)机械通气对急性肺损伤(ALI)兔肺水肿的影响。方法 用数字表法将36只新西兰兔随机分为正常对照(NC)组、ALI组、常规潮气量(15mL/kg)低PEEP(5cmH2O)(CVLP)组、常规潮气量高PEEP(10cmH2O)(CVHP)组、小潮气量(8mL/kg)低PEEP(LVLP)组和小潮气量高PEEP组(LVHP组)。以内毒素静脉注射建立ALI动物模型,经机械通气的4组动物分别给予不同潮气量联合不同水平PEEP机械通气4h。实验结束后取肺组织测定湿质量/干质量比值评价肺水肿严重程度。结果 NC组、ALI组、CVLP组、CVHP组、LVLP组和LVHP组的肺湿质量/干质量比值分别为4.81±0.19、5.84±0.20、5.47±0.28、5.25±0.12、5.24±0.12和5.12±0.10,NC组低于其他各组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ALI组高于各机械通气组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);LVHP组低于CVLP组,差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 机械通气能够减轻ALI肺水肿,小潮气量联合高PEEP机械通气减轻ALI肺水肿的作用更加显著。

关键词: 急性肺损伤, 机械通气, 肺水肿

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of mechanical ventilation with different tidal volumes(VT) and positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEPs) on the lung edema in acute lung injury rabbit(ALI) models.Methods Thirty-six New Zealand rabbits were randomized into 6 groups(6 in each group). ①normal control group(NC), ② ALI group(Lipopolysaccharides 50 μg/kg intravenously), ③CVLP group(ALI + ventilation with VT 15 mL/kg and 5 cmH2O PEEP), ④ CVHP group(ALI + ventilation with VT 15 mL/kg and 10 cmH2O PEEP), ⑤ LVLP group(ALI + ventilation with VT 8 mL/kg and 5 cmH2O PEEP), ⑥ LVHP group(ALI + ventilation with VT 8 mL/kg and 10 cmH2O PEEP). The ALI models receiving ventilation with different tidal volumes and PEEPs were ventilated for 4 h. Lung wet-to-dry weight(W/D) ratio was used to assay the lung edema.Results The W/D ratios in CVLP group(5.47±0.28), CVHP group(5.25±0.12), LVLP group(5.24±0.12) and LVHP group(5.12±0.10) decreased significantly(P<0.05) as compared with that of the ALI group(5.84±0.20), but increased(P<0.05) as compared with the NC group(4.81±0.19). The W/D in LVHP group was lower than that in CVLP group(P<0.05).Conclusion Ventilation attenuates lung edema in ALI models. Ventilation with both low VT and high PEEP is more beneficial for lung edema in ALI.

Key words: acute lung injury, ventilation, lung edema

中图分类号: