首都医科大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 665-670.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2019.05.001

• 临床心理研究进展与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

睡眠功能失调性信念与态度量表中文版的信效度研究

徐波1,2, 杨丽娟1,2, 李占江1,2   

  1. 1. 首都医科大学附属北京安定医院 国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心 精神疾病诊断与治疗北京市重点实验室, 北京 100088;
    2. 首都医科大学人脑保护高精尖创新中心, 北京 100069
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-04 出版日期:2019-09-21 发布日期:2019-12-16
  • 通讯作者: 李占江 E-mail:lizhj8@ccmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大研发计划项目(Z161100002616006)。

Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about sleep scale

Xu Bo1,2, Yang Lijuan1,2, Li Zhanjiang1,2   

  1. 1. The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China;
    2. Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2019-07-04 Online:2019-09-21 Published:2019-12-16
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by National Key R&D Program Matching(Z161100002616006).

摘要: 目的 评估睡眠功能失调性信念与态度量表中文版(Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale-Chinese Version,DBAS-CV)的心理测量学特征。方法 按照《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,DSM-Ⅳ)诊断标准入组原发性失眠者、精神疾病共病失眠者共218例,招募健康被试34例。所有被试均完成睡眠功能失调信念与态度量表(Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep Scale,DBAS)、DBAS-16、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index,PSQI)。其中30名被试在2周后再次进行DBAS量表的评定。结果 探索性因素分析结果显示5个因子是可接受的。修订后量表的总分与DBAS-16、PSQI总分的相关系数分别为0.86、-0.48(均P<0.01),并具有较好的区分效度(P<0.05)。总量表Cronbach α系数为0.83,各分量表Cronbach α系数为0.42~0.78;总量表重测信度为0.94,各分量表的重测信度为0.76~0.93。结论 修订后的中文版DBAS-CV具有较好的信度和效度,可用于评估失眠人群的功能性失调信念。

关键词: 睡眠认知, 信度, 效度, 功能失调性信念与态度量表

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep scale. Methods Totally 218 participants who were diagnosed with primary insomnia and insomnia combided with psychiatric disorders according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) and 34 good sleepers were recruited. All participants were measured by Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale(DBAS), DBAS-16 and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI).Thirty of them were remeasured by DBAS after two weeks.Results Five factors were extracted in the DBAS-Chinese Version (CV) by the exploratory factor analysis. Total DBAS-CV score was significantly correlated with DBAS-16 (r=0.86,P<0.01) and PSQI(r=-0.48, P<0.01). DBAS-CV scale had a good discriminant validity as well (P<0.01). The Cronbach's coefficient of DBAS-CV was 0.83. The Cronbach's coefficients of five subscales were 0.42-0.78. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.94,and coefficient of each subscales ranged from 0.76 to 0.93 (P<0.01). Revised Chinese Version of DBAS scale had a good discriminant validity as well(P<0.01). Conclusion Revised Chinese Version of DBAS showed good reliability and validity, and it could be used to evaluate dysfunctional beliefs in insomniacs.

Key words: sleep cognitions, reliability, validity, Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale(DBAS)

中图分类号: