超声及CTA对主动脉夹层Stanford细化分型的诊断价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2014.02.007

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 173-178.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2014.02.007

超声及CTA对主动脉夹层Stanford细化分型的诊断价值

俞卫东, 杜国庆, 田家玮, 姜双全, 邸郅欣, 王旭东

哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院超声医学科心肌缺血省部共建教育部重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150086

收稿日期:2013-12-18 出版日期:2014-04-21 发布日期:2014-04-16

Application of ultrasound and computed tomography angiography in the aortic dissection depending on the modified Stanford classification system

Yu Weidong, Du Guoqing, Tian Jiawei, Jiang Shuangquan, Di Zhixin, Wang Xudong

Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, the Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, Harbin 150086, China

Received:2013-12-18 Online:2014-04-21 Published:2014-04-16
Contact: 田家玮 E-mail:jwtian2004@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨超声、计算机体层摄影血管造影（computed tomography angiography，CTA）及两者联合对主动脉夹层Stanford细化分型的诊断价值。方法对128例高度怀疑主动脉夹层的患者分别进行超声和CTA检查，并依据Stanford细化分型做出诊断，该分型包括A1、A2、A3型和B1、B2、B3型，其中每个亚型又包括S和C两个亚级；以手术结果为金标准，分别评价超声、CTA及两者联合对主动脉夹层Stanford细化分型的诊断价值。结果 1 术前超声、CTA及两者联合对夹层细化分型诊断的敏感性分别为76.5%、91.3%、100%；特异性分别为34.5%、0%、34.5%；准确性分别为72.7%、82.0%、93.8%；阳性预测值分别为91.7%、89.0%、93.5%；阴性预测值分别为15.6%、0%、100%；2 超声对A1S、A2S、A3S诊断准确率为100%，而对B3C容易漏诊；CTA对A1S、A1C以及所有B亚型诊断准确率为100%，而对A2S、A2C容易误诊；两者结合能明显提高细化分型诊断的准确率。结论超声及CTA对主动脉夹层Stanford细化分型诊断具有重要的诊断价值，两者联合能明显提高诊断的敏感度、准确度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值。

关键词: 超声, 计算机体层摄影血管造影, 主动脉夹层, 分型

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the value of ultrasound and ultrasound combined with CTA in the assessment for modified Stanford classification system of aortic dissection. Methods Totally 128 cases of highly suspected acute dissection patients have been enrolled and examined by ultrasound and CTA respectively, and have been classified depending on the modified Stanford classification system. The modified Stanford classification system of aortic dissection includes the types of A1, A2, A3 and B1, B2, B3, which also includes two subtypes of S and C. According to the surgical findings, the diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound, CTA and combining both in the assessment for modified Stanford classification system of acute aortic dissection have been evaluated. Results The preoperative diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasound, CTA and combination of both in the assessment for modified Stanford classification system of acute aortic dissection is 76.5%, 91.3% and 100%, respectively; the specificity is 34.5%, 0.0% and 34.5% respectively; the accuracy is 72.7%, 82.0% and 93.8% respectively; the positive predictive value is 91.7%, 89.0% and 93.5% respectively; the negative predictive value is 15.6%, 0.0% and 100% respectively. The accuracy of diagnosing the subtypes A1S, A2S and A3S are 100% by ultrasound, but the subtype B3C is easily missed diagnosis; A1S, A1C and all subtypes of B by CTA were 100%, but for A2S and A2C were easily misdiagnosed. Combining ultrasound with CTA can increase the diagnostic accuracy significantly. Conclusion There are great value of ultrasound and CTA in clinical practice for assessment of modified Stanford classification of acute dissection, and combining ultrasound with CTA will contribute to increase significantly the sensitivity, accuracy, the positive predictive and the negative predictive value.

Key words: ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, aortic dissection, classification

中图分类号:

R445

俞卫东, 杜国庆, 田家玮, 姜双全, 邸郅欣, 王旭东. 超声及CTA对主动脉夹层Stanford细化分型的诊断价值[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2014, 35(2): 173-178.

Yu Weidong, Du Guoqing, Tian Jiawei, Jiang Shuangquan, Di Zhixin, Wang Xudong. Application of ultrasound and computed tomography angiography in the aortic dissection depending on the modified Stanford classification system[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2014, 35(2): 173-178.

参考文献

[1] Baloria K A, Dhir A, Pillai B, et al. Aortic dissection: to be or not to be?[J]. Ann Card Anaesth, 2013, 16(2):126-128.
[2] Svensson L G, Kouchoukos N T, Miller D C, et al. Expert consensus document on the treatment of descending on the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008, 85(1Suppl):S1-41.
[3] Olsson C, Thelin S, Stahle E, et al. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14, 000 cases from 1987 to 2002[J]. Circulation, 2006, 114(24):2611-2618.
[4] Eggbrecht H, Herold U, Kuhnt O, et al. Endovascular stent-graft treatment of aortic dissection: determinants of post-interventional outcome[J]. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26(5):489-497.
[5] Kitai T, Kaji S, Yamamuro A, et al. Clinical outcomes of medical therapy and timely operation in initially diagnosed type a aortic intramural hematoma: a 20-year experience[J]. Circulation, 2009, 120(11 Suppl):S292-S298.
[6] 孙立忠, 刘宁宁, 常谦, 等.主动脉夹层的细化分型及其应用[J].中华外科杂志, 2005, 43(18):1171-1176.
[7] Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel C C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 166(13):1350-1356.
[8] Moore A G, Eagle K A, Bruckman D, et al. Choice of computed tomography, transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and aortography in acute aortic dissection: International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection(IRAD)[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 89(10):1235-1238.
[9] Jánosi R A, Erbel R, Konorza T F. Recent advances in the diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes[J]. Expert Opin Med Diagn, 2012, 6(6):529-540.
[10] Panagiotou I, Patris K, Kotileas P, et al. Dissection of the aortic root presenting as a double aortic valve[J]. Hellenic J Cardiol, 2010, 51(3):275-277.
[11] Akgullu C, Hekim T, Eryilmaz U, et al. Spontaneous retrograde dissection of the ascending aorta in a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve[J]. Cardiovasc J Afr, 2013, 24(5):e8-e10.

[1]	李荣雪, 张倩, 邢洁, 孙秀静, 李鹏, 焦月, 张澍田. 超声内镜对早期结直肠癌的诊断价值分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(1): 126-130.
[2]	黄睿, 黄晓武, 吕晓丹, 李斯静, 赵玉婷, 夏恩兰, 李天照. 三维超声对宫腔粘连的诊断价值及基于冠状面成像评分系统的初探[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 380-386.
[3]	刘春涛, 苏珈仪, 旦增卓嘎, 伊比然恨, 卓玛, 张澍田. 西藏自治区藏族人群幽门螺杆菌毒力菌株分型与慢性胃炎及消化性溃疡的相关性研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 463-468.
[4]	任春琦, 孔羽, 伏圣高, 朱正炎, 杜昕. 中青年钙化性主动脉瓣疾病的特征及危险因素分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(2): 187-191.
[5]	胡文莉, 侯登榜, 王粮山, 贾明, 来永强, 侯晓彤, 王红. 心脏手术后脑梗死的危险因素分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 909-914.
[6]	康丽, 李硕, 熊颖, 郭瑞君. 托拉塞米联合葡萄糖快速利尿后超声技术诊断在役飞行员肾微小结石的临床价值[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1076-1080.
[7]	王莉, 张国军. 血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶与外伤性脑损伤患者及临床特征的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(5): 715-720.
[8]	马艳辉, 吴洁, 贾宾, 姚东旭, 徐娜, 王天龙, 陈健, 吴迪. 超声引导股动脉穿刺置管在血管内介入方法制备恒河猴急性脑梗死模型中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 239-242.
[9]	杨祎林, 罗莎, 史婷婷, 信中. ^99mTC-二乙烯三胺五乙酸眼眶SPECT/CT在甲状腺相关性眼病分型及活动度评价中的作用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 280-285.
[10]	姚春勇, 李杨帆, 贾原菊. 66例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者临床特点及胸部电子计算机断层扫描影像表现分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(6): 997-1001.
[11]	吕颖新, 邢晓燕, 孙立忠. 中国主动脉外科的领跑者——孙立忠教授[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(5): 818-821.
[12]	白志杰, 王新胜, 马洪顺, 李波. mpMRI与超声融合导航技术在前列腺靶向穿刺的临床研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 631-635.
[13]	张闻平, 吴静, 任彦军, 常莹, 张雪娟, 马佳, 杜岚, 杨敬春. 直肠腔内超声与磁共振诊断直肠肿瘤的比较研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 641-646.
[14]	马佳, 杨敬春, 吴静, 常莹, 杜岚, 陈述. 超声诊断先天性肾旋转异常的方法探讨[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 647-651.
[15]	董方, 陈东, 商建峰, 方微, 滕飞, 张睿祺. 门诊消化系统疾病患者幽门螺杆菌感染状况分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 372-375.

超声及CTA对主动脉夹层Stanford细化分型的诊断价值

Application of ultrasound and computed tomography angiography in the aortic dissection depending on the modified Stanford classification system

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价