首都医科大学学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 282-286.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2015.02.021

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

双针穿刺臭氧注射+等离子射频治疗盘源性腰腿痛的临床研究

葛维鹏1, 郑观荣1, 杜梅青1, 徐伟民1, 王大龙1, 张海山1, 何明伟2   

  1. 1. 胜利油田中心医院麻醉科, 山东东营 257000;
    2. 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院麻醉中心, 北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-06 发布日期:2015-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 何明伟 E-mail:hemingwei@sina.com

Clinical study of double needle puncture ozone injection combined with coblation in the treatment of discogenic low back pain

Ge Weipeng1, Zheng Guanrong1, Du Meiqing1, Xu Weimin1, Wang Dalong1, Zhang Haishan1, He Mingwei2   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Central Hospital of Shengli Oil Field, Dongying 257000, Shandong Province, China;
    2. Center of Anesthesia, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2014-11-06 Published:2015-04-16

摘要:

目的 探讨双针穿刺臭氧注射结合低温等离子射频治疗盘源性腰腿痛的有效性和安全性。方法 将120例盘源性腰腿痛患者采用数字表法随机分为3组,A组行低温等离子射频,B组行双针穿刺臭氧注射,C组行双针穿刺臭氧注射结合低温等离子射频。评价各组治疗前,治疗后3、30、90 d的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、治疗效果、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)及合并症发生情况。结果 3组患者治疗后各时间点VAS与治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),C组治疗后30、90 d VAS和治疗效果优良率及治疗后90 d ODI与A组、B组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。各组治疗期间均未发生明显不良反应。结论 双针穿刺注射臭氧结合低温等离子射频比单纯低温等离子射频或双针穿刺注射臭氧治疗效果更确切,持续时间更长久。

关键词: 盘源性腰腿痛, 等离子射频, 臭氧, 双针

Abstract:

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of intervertebral disc double needle injection of ozone combined with ablation for the treatment of discogenic low back pain of coblation target through different minimally invasive methods. Methods Totally 120 patients received minimally invasive interventional treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc were randomly divided into 3 groups, Group A received coblation, Group B received double needle injection of ozone, and Group C received both ablation and double needle injection of ozone. Visual analogue scale(VAS), treatment effect, Oswestry disability index(ODI) and complications were evaluated before the treatment, 3 days, 30 days and 90 days after the treatment for all patients. Results The VAS values after treatment in each group significantly decreased, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), and the VAS value reduction and the therapeutic effect of Group C 30 days and 90 days and the ODI of Group C 90 days after the treatment were much more significant than that of Group A and B(P<0.05). No significant complication happened during treatment. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of the combination of double needle injection of ozone and coblation was more obvious and lasted longer.

Key words: discogenic low back pain, coblation, ozone, double needle

中图分类号: