首都医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 34-37.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2022.01.007

• 消化病学基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

内镜下黏膜剥离术治疗低位直肠早癌的临床分析

孙灿, 邢洁, 张希, 孙秀静, 张澍田*   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院消化内科 国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心,北京 100050
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-23 出版日期:2022-02-21 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81802310)。

Clinical research of endoscopic submucosal dissection in low rectal early cancer

Sun Can, Xing Jie, Zhang Xi, Sun Xiujing, Zhang Shutian*   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2021-11-23 Online:2022-02-21 Published:2022-11-29
  • Contact: * E-mail:zhangshutian@ccmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81802310).

摘要: 目的 评价内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)治疗低位直肠早癌的疗效及安全性。方法 将首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院内镜中心2016年1月至2020年12月行ESD治疗且病理诊断为结直肠早癌的449例患者为研究对象,平均年龄(63.90±9.99)岁,其中男性269例(59.9%),病变大小的中位数为20(14,27)mm。根据病变的不同位置分为低位直肠组(n=48)和对照组(n=401),比较两组患者的临床病理特征、手术时间、整块切除率、完整切除率及并发症发生情况。结果 低位直肠组与对照组两组患者间性别构成比及年龄比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。低位直肠组病变大小的中位数为20.5(15,34.5)mm,对照组病变大小的中位数为19(13,27)mm,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。低位直肠组患者中位手术时间为60(33.25,88.75)min,对照组患者中位手术时间为40(25,60.5)min,二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。低位直肠组黏膜下层及以上浸润深度的比例为22.9%,高于对照组的10.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间整块切除率、完整切除率及术后并发症的发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 ESD治疗低位直肠早癌较其他部位病变的手术时间更长,肿瘤黏膜下深浸润的可能性更高。在术前充分评估适应证的前提下,ESD是低位直肠早癌安全有效的治疗方法。

关键词: 内镜黏膜下剥离术, 早期消化道肿瘤, 低位直肠

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of low rectal early cancer. Methods The data of 449 patients (269 male,59.9%)with early colorectal cancer who underwent ESD treatment and were pathologically diagnosed from January 2016 to Decmeber 2020 in the Department of Gastroenterology of Beijing Friendship Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The average age of the patients was (63.90±9.99) years, and the median size of the lesion was [20(14,27)]mm. The patients were divided into low rectum group (n=48) and control group(n=401), according to the different locations of lesions. The clinicopathological characteristics, operation time, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and complications were compared with each other between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in gender ratio and age between the two groups. The median size of lesions was [20.5(15,34.5)]mm in the low rectum group and [19(13,27)]mm in the control group, with a significant difference. The median operation time was [60(33.25,88.75)]min in the low rectum group and [40(25,60.5)]min in the control group. The rate of invasion depth of submucosal in the low rectum group was 22.9%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (10.7%). There were no significant differences in the en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and postoperative complication rate between the two groups. Conclusion ESDtreatment of low rectal early cancer took longer operation time than that of the other colorectal parts. The possibility of deep submucosal invasion was higher. On the premise of fully evaluating the indications, ESD was a safe and effective treatment for low rectal early cancer.

Key words: endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), noninvasive early gastrointestinal cancer, low rectum

中图分类号: