首都医科大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 192-196.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2017.02.009

• 精神分裂症和抑郁症的基础和临床 • 上一篇    下一篇

人格解体障碍病人的自我面孔识别速度的研究

徐蕊, 杨敬铭, 朱虹, 刘珊珊, 贾竑晓   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京安定医院北京脑重大疾病研究院精神分裂症研究所 精神疾病诊断与治疗北京市重点实验室, 北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-20 出版日期:2017-03-21 发布日期:2017-04-17
  • 通讯作者: 贾竑晓,E-mail:jhxlj@ccmu.edu.com E-mail:jhxlj@ccmu.edu.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金(7152069),北京市科委首都临床特色应用研究专项(Z151100004015061)

An experimental study of self-face recognition speed in patients with depersonalization disorder

Xu Rui, Yang Jingming, Zhu Hong, Liu Shanshan, Jia Hongxiao   

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory for Mental Disorders Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2017-01-20 Online:2017-03-21 Published:2017-04-17
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Beijing(7152069), Clinical Characteristics Program of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z151100004015061)

摘要: 目的 运用自我面孔识别认知心理学范式,探讨人格解体障碍病人是否存在自我加工过程的异常。方法 对17例符合精神障碍诊断标准与统计手册第4版(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,Fourth Edition,DSM-Ⅳ)的人格解体障碍病人以及17例年龄、性别、受教育年限匹配的正常被试进行自我面孔识别的测查。实验要求被试分别通过右手按键混合了任意两种面孔特征的合成面孔(自我-名人,名人-陌生人,自我-陌生人)中其中一种面孔身份及马赛克图片进行识别,记录被试对"自我"图片和"他人"图片的反应速度,取平均值作为被试对该面孔的反应时间(ms),以每个实验条件下被试对马赛克图片的识别时间为基准计算反应时间比。结果 重复方差分析显示,被试分组的主效应差异有统计学意义(F=20.57,P=0.001),不同图片任务的主效应差异有统计学意义(F=3.67,P=0.031),被试组别与图片类型之间交互作用差异有统计学意义(F=10.75,P=0.001)。人格解体障碍病人对名人图片的识别速度慢于陌生人图片[(1.21±0.42)vs(1.06±0.21),P=0.001],对自我图片和名人图片的识别速度慢于正常被试[(1.12±0.30)vs(0.99±0.09),P=0.000;(1.21±0.42)vs(1.01±0.06),P=0.000],对陌生图片的识别速度与正常被试组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,人格解体障碍病人对名人图片的反应时间比与剑桥人格解体量表总分(r=0.516,P=0.034)和熟悉性条目分数(r=0.498,P=0.042)呈正相关。结论 人格解体障碍病人对熟悉性面孔的识别速度减慢并且与临床症状相关,提示其熟悉性加工可能受损。

关键词: 人格解体障碍, 自我面孔识别, 反应速度

Abstract: Objective To explore the characteristics of self-processing and familiarity-processing in patients with depersonalization disorder. Methods Seventeen patients meeting the depersonalization disorder criterion of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-Ⅳ) and seventeen normal subjects matched for age, sex and level of education were recruited to participate in the self-face recognition test. All subjects were required to identify the identity of one certain face by pressing buttons using right hand respectively from a mixture of any two face features (self-famous, famous-stranger and self-stranger) and scrambled faces. The recognition speed to “self-face” and “other-face” were collected. The average recognition speed to the same kind of picture in different tasks was regarded as response time. Under each experimental condition, the reaction time to scrambled (control) pictures was taken as benchmark, which could be used to the reaction time ratio (corrected reaction time). Results Repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant main effect of group and intra group (F=20.57, P=0.001; F=3.67, P=0.031), interaction effect of group and picture was significant (F=10.75, P=0.001). Depersonalization disorder patients were significantly slower in recognizing the familiar pictures than strange pictures[(1.21±0.42) vs (1.06±0.21), P=0.001]. The reaction time ratio of both self-face[(1.12±0.30) vs (0.99±0.09)] and familiar-face[(1.21±0.42) vs (1.01±0.06)] in depersonalization disorder patients were slower than that in healthy controls (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that there was significantly positive correlations between the reacting time ratio of familiar pictures and total score of Cambridge Depersonalization Scale (CDS) (r=0.516,P=0.034)and familiarity score (r=0.498,P=0.042)in CDS. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that the reaction speed to familiar faces in depersonalization disorder patients is decreased,and further suggests that the familiarity-processing effect might be impaired in depersonalization disorder patients.

Key words: depersonalization disorder(DPD), self-face recognition, reaction speed

中图分类号: