首都医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 782-786.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2022.05.018

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

呼吸道病原菌在细菌培养阳性组和阴性组中多重定量PCR检测结果的对比分析

卓献霞1,2, 赵建康2, 曹彬1,2*   

  1. 1.首都医科大学中日友好临床医学院,北京 100029;
    2.中日友好医院呼吸与危重症医学科,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-11 出版日期:2022-10-21 发布日期:2022-10-25
  • 基金资助:
    中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程(2021-I2M-1-048)。

Comparison of the quantitative results of a multiplex quantitative PCR between positive and negative bacterial culture groups of respiratory pathogens

Zhuo Xianxia1,2, Zhao Jiankang2, Cao Bin1,2*   

  1. 1. China-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China;
    2. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2022-04-11 Online:2022-10-21 Published:2022-10-25
  • Contact: * E-mail:caobin_ben@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Medical and Health Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-1-048).

摘要: 目的 比较多重定量聚合酶链式反应(polymerase chain reaction, PCR)分子诊断方法对细菌培养阳性和阴性的下呼吸道标本细菌定量的差异。方法 收集2019年11月至2021年3月在中日友好医院临床微生物与感染实验室下呼吸道感染患者的痰液或支气管肺泡灌洗液,同时使用传统培养方法和多重定量聚合酶链式反应(polymerase chain reaction, PCR)方法检测12种目标病原菌,比较在PCR阳性病例中培养阳性组和培养阴性组细菌定量水平的差异。结果 共收集到125例符合入组标准的呼吸道标本,其中多重定量PCR阳性101例。在101例多重定量PCR阳性样本中,细菌培养阳性31例,细菌培养阴性70例,多重定量PCR在培养阳性组检出目标病原菌33次,在培养阴性组检出目标病原菌144次,检出次数最多的鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的细菌定量中位值在培养阳性组和阴性组分别为1.44×108 copies/mL vs 1.22×107 copies/mL、7.10×108 copies/mL vs 4.83×106 copies/mL和4.28×107 copies/mL vs 5.77×104 copies/mL,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 多重定量PCR能对检测的病原体进行准确定量,且在培养阳性组的细菌定量中位值高于阴性组。

关键词: 多重定量PCR, 细菌, 下呼吸道感染

Abstract: Objective Comparison of the bacterial quantification of culture-positive and culture-negative lower respiratory tract specimens by the multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (MQ-PCR) molecular diagnostic method. Methods Sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected from patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in the Clinical Microbiology and Infection Laboratory of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from November 2019 to March 2021, and 12 target pathogens were detected by traditional culture and the MQ-PCR methods. The differences in bacterial quantification between culture-positive and culture-negative groups were compared. Results A total of 125 respiratory samples were collected that met the inclusion criteria, of which 101 were positive for the MQ-PCR. Among the 101 positive samples detected by the MQ-PCR, 31 samples were bacterial culture-positive, and 70 samples were negative for culture. In addition, the target pathogens were detected by the MQ-PCR 33 times in the culture-positive group and 144 times in the culture-negative group. The median of the bacterial load in Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which were the most detected, were 1.44×108 copies/mL vs 1.22×107 copies/mL,7.10×108 copies/mL vs 4.83×106 copies/mL,and 4.28×107 copies/mL vs 5.77×104 copies/mL in the culture-positive group and culture-negative group, and the P values were all less than 0.05. Conclusion The MQ-PCR can accurately quantify the target pathogens, and the median of the bacterial load in the culture-positive group is higher than that in the culture-negative group.

Key words: multiplex quantitative PCR, bacteria, lower respiratory tract infection

中图分类号: