骨科手术机器人辅助与X线透视辅助下徒手皮质骨轨迹螺钉置入治疗单节段退行性腰椎疾病的临床对比研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2023.05.019

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 836-844.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2023.05.019

骨科手术机器人辅助与X线透视辅助下徒手皮质骨轨迹螺钉置入治疗单节段退行性腰椎疾病的临床对比研究

张希诺,刘玉增,李越,苏庆军,李冬月,关立,海涌^*

首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科，北京 100020

收稿日期:2022-12-30 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-25
通讯作者: 海涌 E-mail:yong.hai@ccmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
北京市自然科学基金—海淀原始创新联合基金项目（L212038,L202006, L222058），北京市医院管理中心创新梦工场项目（202107），北京市医院管理中心临床医学发展专项（YGLX202307），北京市临床重点专科项目

linical comparative study of robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar diseases

Zhang Xinuo, Liu Yuzeng, Li Yue, Su Qingjun, Li Dongyue, Guan Li, Hai yong^*

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China

Received:2022-12-30 Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-25
Supported by:
This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Beijing（L212038,L202006, L222058）, Beijing Hospitals Authority Innovation Studio of Young Staff Funding Support（202107）,Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding（YGLX202307）,Beijing Key Clinical Specialty Project.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对比骨科手术机器人辅助与徒手皮质骨螺钉置钉在脊柱内固定手术中的安全性与准确性。方法回顾分析2019年12月至2021年6月于首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科接受皮质骨轨迹螺钉（cortical bone trajectory, CBT）治疗单节段退行性腰椎疾病的71例患者。将接受X线透视辅助徒手CBT螺钉置入的患者作为徒手组（n=35），接受机器人辅助CBT螺钉置入的作为机器人组（n=36）。螺钉置钉准确性和关节突侵犯情况通过术后电子计算机断层扫描（computed tomography，CT）三维重建评估。对比两组平均单枚螺钉的置钉时间、术中出血量及医务人员术中射线暴露情况。结果 71例患者一共植入284枚CBT螺钉，其中140枚由徒手组完成，144枚由机器人组完成。机器人组的准确率显著高于徒手组（92.36% vs 82.86%，P=0.015）。机器人组关节突侵犯发生率显著低于徒手组（22.22% vs 40.00%，P=0.022）。但是，单颗螺钉置钉时间机器人组显著长于徒手组［（501.92±70.08) s vs (382.54±63.21)s，P=0.000］。术中医务人员辐射暴露时间徒手组明显高于机器人组［（56.81±16.09) s vs (34.43±16.91) s，P=0.000］。结论机器人辅助植入CBT螺钉可以有效提高螺钉置入准确性并减少了上关节突的侵犯率和医务人员的辐射暴露，但会增加螺钉的置钉时间与手术时间。本中心大约在12台手术后获得了平稳的机器人辅助CBT技术学习曲线。

关键词: 皮质骨轨迹螺钉, 骨科手术机器人, 徒手置钉, 退行性腰椎疾病

Abstract: Objective To compare the safety and accuracy of robotic-assisted and free-hand cortical screw placement in spinal internal fixation. Methods A total of 71 patients who underwent cortical bone trajectory screw (CBT) for single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease at our center from December 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients receiving fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand CBT screw placement were assigned to the free-hand group (FG, n=35) and robot-assisted CBT screw placement was assigned to the robot-assisted group (RG, n=36). Screw placement accuracy and facet violation were assessed by three-dimensional reconstruction of postoperative computed tomography(CT). The average screw placement time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative radiation exposure of medical staff were compared between the two groups.Results A total of 284 CBT screws were implanted in 71 patients, 140 of which were completed by the FG and 144 screws by the RG. Robot-assisted nailing was significantly more accurate than free-hand nailing (92.36% vs 82.86%, P=0.015). The incidence of facet joint violation was significantly lower in the RG than in the FG (22.22% vs 40.00%, P=0.022). However, the single screw placement time was significantly longer in the RG than in the FG ［(501.92±70.08) s vs (382.54±63.21) s, P=0.000］. The radiation exposure time of medical staff during surgery was significantly lower in the RG than in the FG ［(56.81±16.09) s vs (34.43±16.91) s, P=0.000］.Conclusions Robot-assisted CBT screw implantation can effectively improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce the invasion rate of superior facet and radiation exposure of medical staff, but it will increase the screw placement time and operation time of screws. Our center achieved a smooth learning curve after approximately 12 procedures.

Key words: cortical bone trajectory, orthopedic surgical robot, freehand screw placement, degenerative lumbar disease

中图分类号:

R681.5+7

张希诺, 刘玉增, 李越, 苏庆军, 李冬月, 关立, 海涌. 骨科手术机器人辅助与X线透视辅助下徒手皮质骨轨迹螺钉置入治疗单节段退行性腰椎疾病的临床对比研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(5): 836-844.

Zhang Xinuo, Liu Yuzeng, Li Yue, Su Qingjun, Li Dongyue, Guan Li, Hai yong. linical comparative study of robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar diseases[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2023, 44(5): 836-844.

参考文献

［1］Santoni B G, Hynes R A, McGilvray K C, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws［J］. Spine J, 2009, 9(5): 366-373.
［2］Cofano F, Marengo N, Ajello M, et al. The era of cortical bone trajectory screws in spine surgery: a qualitative review with rating of evidence［J］. World Neurosurg, 2020, 134: 14-24.
［3］张天擎, 张希诺, 韩渤, 等. 皮质骨轨迹螺钉与椎弓根螺钉在后路胸腰椎融合术应用的Meta分析［J］. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(4): 510-516.
［4］Ding H T, Han B, Hai Y, et al. The feasibility of assessing the cortical bone trajectory screw placement accuracy using a traditional pedicle screw insertion evaluation system［J］. Clin Spine Surg, 2021, 34(2): E112-E120.
［5］Silva F, Silva P S, Vaz R, et al. Midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) with cortical screws: initial experience and learning curve［J］. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2019, 161(12): 2415-2420.
［6］Rexiti P, Aierken A, Sadeer A, et al. Anatomy and imaging studies on cortical bone screw freehand placement applying anatomical targeting technology［J］. Orthop Surg, 2020, 12(6): 1954-1962.
［7］Jia L, Yu Y, Khan K, et al. Superior facet joint violations during single level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary retrospective clinical study［J］. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 6152769.
［8］丁红涛, 海涌, 刘玉增, 等. 腰椎后路融合术应用皮质骨轨迹螺钉内固定对邻近节段退变的影响［J］. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(43): 3437-3442.
［9］Elswick C M, Strong M J, Joseph J R, et al. Robotic-assisted spinal surgery: current generation instrumentation and new applications［J］. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2020, 31(1): 103-110.
［10］Feng S, Tian W, Sun Y Q, et al. Effect of robot-assisted surgery on lumbar pedicle screw internal fixation in patients with osteoporosis［J］. World Neurosurg, 2019, 125: e1057-e1062.
［11］Gertzbein S D, Robbins S E. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo［J］. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1990, 15(1): 11-14.
［12］Yson S C, Sembrano J N, Sanders P C, et al. Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation［J］. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38(4): E251-E258.
［13］Moshirfar A, Jenis L G, Spector L R, et al. Computed tomography evaluation of superior-segment facet-joint violation after pedicle instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a midline surgical approach［J］. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(22): 2624-2629.
［14］Petrone S, Marengo N, Ajello M, et al. Cortical bone trajectory techniques outcomes and procedures for posterior lumbar fusion: a retrospective study［J］. J Clin Neurosci, 2020, 76: 25-30.
［15］Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, et al. In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique［J］. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(4): E240-E245.
［16］Kim J, Rajadurai J, Choy W J, et al. Three-dimensional patient-specific guides for intraoperative navigation for cortical screw trajectory pedicle fixation［J］. World Neurosurg, 2019, 122: 674-679.
［17］Li H M, Zhang R J, Shen C L. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted technique versus conventional freehand technique in spine surgery from nine randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis［J］. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020, 45(2): E111-E119.
［18］Hung C W, Wu M F, Hong R T, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory［J］. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2016, 145: 41-45.
［19］李越, 刘玉增, 潘爱星, 等. 皮质骨轨迹螺钉技术在脊柱外科的应用［J］. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(45): 3762-3766.
［20］Crawford N R, Yüksel K Z, Dog∨an S, et al. Trajectory analysis and pullout strength of self-centering lumbar pedicle screws［J］. J Neurosurg Spine, 2009, 10(5): 486-491.
［21］Jiang B W, Pennington Z, Azad T, et al. Robot-assisted versus freehand instrumentation in short-segment lumbar fusion: experience with real-time image-guided spinal robot［J］. World Neurosurg, 2020, 136: e635-e645.
［22］Le X F, Tian W, Shi Z, et al. Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted cortical bone trajectory screw instrumentation in lumbar spinal surgery: a matched-cohort comparison［J］. World Neurosurg, 2018, 120: e745-e751.
［23］Zhang L A, Tian N F, Yang J, et al. Risk of pedicle and spinous process violation during cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the lumbar spine［J］. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 536.
［24］Kumar K K, Parikh B, Jabarkheel R, et al. Fluoroscopic versus CT-guided cortical bone trajectory pedicle screw fixation: comparing trajectory related complications［J］. J Clin Neurosci, 2021, 89: 354-359.
［25］Dayani F, Chen Y R, Johnson E, et al. Minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw fixation using cortical bone trajectory-screw accuracy, complications, and learning curve in 100 screw placements［J］. J Clin Neurosci, 2019, 61: 106-111.
［26］Dabbous B, Brown D, Tsitlakidis A, et al. Clinical outcomes during the learning curve of MIDline Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF) using the cortical bone trajectory［J］. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2016, 158(7):1413-1420.
［27］Kam J K T, Gan C, Dimou S, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery［J］. Asian Spine J, 2019, 13(6): 920-927.
［28］徐子航, 龙浩, 何祖波, 等. 机器人辅助皮质骨轨迹螺钉内固定术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的置钉准确率及学习曲线分析［J］. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2022, 32(4): 305-312.

骨科手术机器人辅助与X线透视辅助下徒手皮质骨轨迹螺钉置入治疗单节段退行性腰椎疾病的临床对比研究

linical comparative study of robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar diseases

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价