眼附属器淋巴瘤18F-FDG PET/CT的代谢特征及其与临床分期的相关性

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.01.004

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 21-25.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.01.004

眼附属器淋巴瘤¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT的代谢特征及其与临床分期的相关性

王观筠^1,2, 杨晖¹, 陈佳欣², 肖文田^2,3, 李灿¹, 姚树林¹, 王瑞民¹, 徐白萱^1*

1.解放军总医院第一医学中心核医学科,北京 100853;
2.解放军医学院,北京 100853;
3.解放军总医院第一医学中心眼科,北京 100853

收稿日期:2020-11-30 出版日期:2021-02-21 发布日期:2021-02-02
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(82071958)。

Correlation between metabolic characteristics of ocular adnexal lymphoma manifested by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and its clinical stage

Wang Guanyun^1,2, Yang Hui¹, Chen Jiaxin², Xiao Wentian^2,3, Li Can¹, Yao Shulin¹, Wang Ruimin¹, Xu Baixuan^1*

1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China;
2. Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China;
3. Department of Ophthalmology, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China

Received:2020-11-30 Online:2021-02-21 Published:2021-02-02
Contact: ^*E-mail:xbx301@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071958).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析眼附属器淋巴瘤(ocular adnexal lymphomas,OAL)氟-18-脱氧葡萄糖(¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose,¹⁸F-FDG)正电子发射型计算机断层扫描显像(positron emission tomography/computed tomography, PET/CT)的代谢参数与临床分期之间的关系,并比较不同病理类型OAL之间代谢参数的差异。方法将2012年4月至2020年4月在解放军总医院第一医学中心核医学科行¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT检查并由病理诊断为OAL的患者为研究对象。分别记录病灶最大标准化摄取值(maximum standardized uptake value,SUVmax)、平均标准化摄取值(average standardized uptake value,SUVmean)、代谢体积(metabolic tumor volume,MTV)与病灶糖酵解总量(total lesion glycolysis lesion,TLG)。以¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT结果及患者临床资料进行Ann Arbor分期。根据主要病理类型进行分组,比较各组代谢参数的差异,并比较所有病例各代谢参数与不同分期的相关性。结果共计37名初发OAL患者纳入研究。病理分型以黏膜相关淋巴组织结外边缘区 B 细胞淋巴瘤(extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, MALT, n=13)、弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL, n=12)和结外NK/T细胞淋巴瘤,鼻型(extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, ENK-TCL, n=7)为主。通过比较上述3组患者各项代谢参数后发现,DLBCL、 ENK-TCL与MALT之间各项代谢参数差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。在所有37例患者中,不同分期的代谢参数中SUVmax和TLG差异存在统计学意义(P＜0.05)。各项代谢参数均与疾病分期呈正相关, 其中TLG与MTV的相关性较SUV_max及SUV_mean更强。结论 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT各项代谢参数与临床分期具有相关性,其中TLG与MTV与临床分期的相关性更强。

关键词: 眼附属器淋巴瘤, 正电子发射型计算机断层扫描显像, 代谢参数, 诊断, 分期

Abstract: Objective To analyze the relationship between the metabolic parameters of ocular adnexal lymphoma (OAL) by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose(¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT) and its clinical stage, and compare the differences of metabolic parameters between different pathological types of OAL.Methods A total of 37 patients who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from April 2012 to April 2020 and was diagnosed as OAL by pathology were enrolled. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis lesion (TLG) were retrospectively analyzed, respectively. Ann Arbor classification was based on PET/CT results and clinical data. The patients were grouped according to main pathological types, and the differences in the metabolic parameters between the groups were compared to each other to explore the correlations between the metabolic parameters and different stages. Results The pathological classification was mainly B-cell lymphoma in the extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT, n=13), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=12) and extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENK-TCL, n=7). By comparing the metabolic parameters of the above three groups, the differences of metabolic parameters between DLBCL, ENK-TCL and MALT were statistically significant (P<0.01). In all 37 patients, there were significant differences in SUVmax and TLG among different stages (P<0.05), and the metabolic parameters were positively correlated with disease stages, and the correlation between TLG and MTV were stronger than that between SUVmax and SUVmean. Conclusion The metabolic parameters manifested by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were correlated with clinical stage, especially TLG and MTV.

Key words: ocular adnexal lymphoma, positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT), metabolic parameters, diagnosis, staging

中图分类号:

王观筠, 杨晖, 陈佳欣, 肖文田, 李灿, 姚树林, 王瑞民, 徐白萱. 眼附属器淋巴瘤¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT的代谢特征及其与临床分期的相关性[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(1): 21-25.

Wang Guanyun, Yang Hui, Chen Jiaxin, Xiao Wentian, Li Can, Yao Shulin, Wang Ruimin, Xu Baixuan. Correlation between metabolic characteristics of ocular adnexal lymphoma manifested by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and its clinical stage[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2021, 42(1): 21-25.

参考文献

[1] Jakobiec F A.Ocular adnexal lymphoid tumors: progress in need of clarification[J].Am J Ophthalmol, 2008,145(6):941-950.
[2] Purohit B S, Vargas M I, Ailianou A, et al.Orbital tumours and tumour-like lesions: exploring the armamentarium of multiparametric imaging[J].Insights Imaging,2016,7(1):43-68.
[3] Hui K H, Pfeiffer M L, Esmaeli B.Value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis and staging of primary ocular and orbital tumors[J].Saudi J Ophthalmol, 2012,26(4):365-371.
[4] 袁媛, 李金娇, 肖荦,等.Ann Arbor分期划分淋巴瘤淋巴结区域的意义探讨[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2017,27(10):107-111.
[5] Chang S, Kim S J.Prediction of recurrence and mortality of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients using pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters: intratumoral heterogeneity, SUV, and volumetric parameters[J].Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 2016,31(1):1-6.
[6] Mulay K, Honavar S G.An update on ocular adnexal lymphoma[J].Semin Diagn Pathol, 2016,33(3):164-172.
[7] Ferry J A, Fung C Y, Zukerberg L, et al. Lymphoma of the ocular adnexa: A study of 353 cases[J].Am J Surg Pathol,2007, 31(2):170-84.
[8] McKelvie P A, McNab A, Francis I C, et al.Ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative disease: a series of 73 cases[J].Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2001,29(6):387-393.
[9] Politi L S, Forghani R, Godi C, et al.Ocular adnexal lymphoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging for differential diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring[J].Radiology, 2010,256(2):565-574.
[10]Kalemaki M S, Karantanas A H, Exarchos D, et al.PET/CT and PET/MRI in ophthalmic oncology (Review)[J].Int J Oncol, 2020,56(2):417-429.
[11]Suga K, Yasuhiko K, Hiyama A, et al.F-18 FDG PET/CT findings in a patient with bilateral orbital and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas[J].Clin Nucl Med, 2009,34(9):589-593.
[12]Rubinstein T J, Aziz H A, Bellerive C, et al.Ocular/adnexal lymphoma: dissimilar to systemic lymphoma[J].Surv Ophthalmol, 2018,63(3):381-388.
[13]Alkatan H M, Alaraj A, El-Khani A, et al.Ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative disorders in an ophthalmic referral center in Saudi Arabia[J].Saudi J Ophthalmol, 2013,27(3):227-230.
[14]胡轶,何为民.眼附属器淋巴瘤的临床病理分析[J].国际眼科杂志, 2019, 19(6): 1082-1085.
[15] Park H L, O J H, Park S Y, et al.Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in non-conjunctival origin ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas[J].EJNMMI Res, 2019,9(1):99.
[16]Klingenstein A, Garip-Kuebler A, Mueller-Lisse U G,et al.Combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis and monitoring of orbital adnexal lymphoma[J].Acta Ophthalmol, 2018,96(6):e712-e717.

眼附属器淋巴瘤¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT的代谢特征及其与临床分期的相关性

Correlation between metabolic characteristics of ocular adnexal lymphoma manifested by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and its clinical stage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李荣雪, 张倩, 邢洁, 孙秀静, 李鹏, 焦月, 张澍田. 超声内镜对早期结直肠癌的诊断价值分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(1): 126-130.
[2]	罗诗雨, 李眉, 罗莎, 王爽, 张娟, 李萌, 南潇, 鲜军舫. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT在脉络膜黑色素瘤与脉络膜转移癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(6): 867-872.
[3]	钱坤, 赵昕, 谭晓刚, 田笑如, 刘幸生, 张毅. 电子计算机断层扫描引导下经皮肺穿刺活检磨玻璃结节的诊断价值[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 558-563.
[4]	谭晓刚, 张毅. 电磁导航支气管镜在肺外周病变诊断及治疗的临床应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 570-575.
[5]	田明, 孔秋, 候晓晓, 苗劲蔚. 良、恶性卵巢甲状腺肿的临床和病理特征分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 343-349.
[6]	鞠蕊, 阮祥燕, 代荫梅, 白勇涛, 杨瑜, 许新, 程姣姣, 杨幸子, 施琰红, 孙艳华, 李瑞玲. 女性性功能障碍的影响因素研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 357-363.
[7]	侯磊, 王小新, 刘丽恒, 张为远, 王欣. 134例生长受限胎儿产前诊断结果分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 375-379.
[8]	吕晗, 赵鹏飞, 尹红霞, 王振常. 耳科影像学的关键技术创新和应用——2020年度国家科学技术进步奖二等奖[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 13-16.
[9]	刘洋, 吴玉梅, 何玥, 樊蓓, 王雁, 赵辉, 王明. ⅠB期子宫颈癌国际妇产科联盟2018新分期的合理性验证及评估[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1026-1032.
[10]	高广程, 孙欣, 许颖, 禚风麟. 女性外阴巨大溃疡临床分析和经验总结[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1046-1052.
[11]	鞠蕊, 阮祥燕, 代荫梅, 白勇涛, 杨幸子, 施琰红, 许新, 杨瑜, 程姣姣, 孙艳华, 李瑞玲. 不同生殖衰老分期及激素替代治疗的绝经期女性性功能障碍状况分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 533-539.
[12]	刘翕然, 徐雁, 王维治, 王丽华, 张美妮, 李春阳, 董会卿, 李国忠, 刘洪波, 付锦, 金涛, 管阳太, 檀国军, 郭力, 张星虎. 中国多发性硬化临床特点及诊断难点分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(3): 360-366.
[13]	侯磊, 李介岩, 邢宇, 刘丽恒, 王欣. 22q11.2微缺失综合征胎儿的超声特征[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 183-187.
[14]	王丽, 武姣彦, 杨敏福. 初诊肺腺癌患者PET/CT显像的心肌代谢特征及影响左心室心肌代谢增高的因素分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-7.
[15]	张景辉, 金岚, 李俊, 吴国聪, 杨鋆, 姚宏伟, 杨盈赤, 张忠涛. 开腹腹部手术延迟性术后肠麻痹的危险因素分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 636-640.