中医五行人之木行人与金行人认知功能差异比较研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2024.03.013

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 458-465.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2024.03.013

中医五行人之木行人与金行人认知功能差异比较研究

戴芷晴^1,2, 林锦^1,2, 段宇航^1,2, 滕飞^1,2, 吕宏蓬^1,2*#, 贾竑晓^1,2*#

1.首都医科大学附属北京安定医院国家精神疾病医学中心国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心精神疾病诊断与治疗北京市重点实验室，北京 100088；2.人脑保护高精尖创新中心，首都医科大学，北京 100069

收稿日期:2024-03-18 出版日期:2024-06-21 发布日期:2024-06-13
通讯作者: 吕宏蓬, 贾竑晓 E-mail:molly731@126.com, jhxlj@ccmu.edu.cn
作者简介:吕宏蓬和贾竑晓对本文有同等贡献
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（82305193，82174311），北京中医药薪火传承“新3+3”工程示范案例项目（2023-ZYSF-19）。

A study on the differences of cognitive functions between individuals dominated by Wood Element and Metal Element among the Five Elements people

Dai Zhiqing^{1, 2}, Lin Jin^{1, 2}, Duan Yuhang^{1, 2}, Teng Fei^{1, 2}, Lyu Hongpeng^{1, 2*#}, Jia Hongxiao^{1, 2*#}

1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders Beijng Anding Hospital, Capital Medical Uniersity, Beijing 100088, China; 2. Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China

Received:2024-03-18 Online:2024-06-21 Published:2024-06-13
Supported by:
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82305193，82174311), Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Inheritance “New 3+3” Program Demonstration Case Project (2023-ZYSF-19).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的基于现代心理学认知测查范式探讨中医五行人中木行人与金行人的认知功能及加工过程差异，为丰富中医五行人理论及中医心理学内涵提供基础。方法根据前期制订的《中医五行（形）人面部表型分类量化规范》，招募典型的木行人与金行人，采用重复性成套神经心理状态测验（Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, RBANS）、自上而下和自下而上线索化范式测评其认知功能及注意加工差异。采用独立样本t检验和秩和检验对两组受试者的认知功能进行差异性分析。结果共纳入受试者木行人32例、金行人40例。在RBANS中，与木行人相比，金行人视觉广度及其子任务线条定位得分更高（P<0.05）；在自下而上线索化范式中，与金行人相比，木行人短时反应时差值更高，与木行人相比，金行人长时反应时差值更高，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论中医五行人中木行人更依赖自下而上的认知加工方式，金行人更擅长处理视空间信息，更节约认知加工资源。

关键词: 中医五行人, 认知功能, 自上而下, 自下而上

Abstract: Objective To provide a basis for enriching the theory of the Five Elements and the psychological connotation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) by means of investigating the differences in the cognitive functions and processing processes between individuals dominated by the Wood Element and those dominated by the Metal Element according to the Five Elements theory in the TCM.Methods According to the previous devised Quantitative Standard for Facial Phenotype Classification of TCM Five Elements People, typical individuals with a dominant Wood or Metal Element were recruited. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) cognitive function assessment tool, as well as the Top-down and Bottom-up cue target task paradigm were employed to evaluate their cognitive functions and attentional processing differences. Independent sample t-tests and rank sum tests were applied to analyze the differences in cognitive functions between the two groups of participants. Results This research included 32 participants with a dominant Wood Element and 40 participants with a dominant Metal Element. In RBANS cognitive function assessment tool, compared to the Wood Element group, the Metal Element group exhibited significantly higher scores in the visuospatial dimension and its subtask line orientation (P＜0.05). In the bottom-up cue target task paradigm, the Wood Element group displayed a statistically higher short reaction time difference. In contrast, the Metal Element group demonstrated a significant higher long reaction time difference (P<0.05). Conclusion In the theory of TCM Five Elements, the Wood Element group relied more on bottom-up cognitive processing, while the Metal Element group performed better in processing visuo-spatial information and conserving cognitive processing resources.

Key words: traditional Chinese medicine Five Element people, cognitive function, Top-down, Bottom-up

中图分类号:

R749

戴芷晴, 林锦, 段宇航, 滕飞, 吕宏蓬, 贾竑晓. 中医五行人之木行人与金行人认知功能差异比较研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(3): 458-465.

Dai Zhiqing, Lin Jin, Duan Yuhang, Teng Fei, Lyu Hongpeng, Jia Hongxiao. A study on the differences of cognitive functions between individuals dominated by Wood Element and Metal Element among the Five Elements people[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2024, 45(3): 458-465.

参考文献

［1］慕平注. 尚书［M］. 北京: 中华书局, 2012: 128.
［2］ Li J J, Yang X Y, Jia H X, et al. The psychosomatic traits of “people with the five elements in traditional Chinese medicine”: a qualitative study［J］. Biomed Environ Sci, 2023, 36(11): 1068－1078.
［3］黄希庭, 郑涌. 心理学导论［M］. 3版. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2015.
［4］ US Preventive Services Task Force, Owens D K, Davidson K W, et al. Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement［J］. JAMA, 2020, 323(8): 757－763.
［5］ Stanek K C, Ones D S. Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability［J］. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2023, 120(23): e2212794120.
［6］路漫漫, 鞠宝兆. 《黄帝内经》五形人体质类型探析［J］. 中华中医药杂志, 2017, 32(9): 3910－3912.
［7］崔笛. 中医阴阳五行人体质辨识方案方法研究［D］. 成都: 成都中医药大学, 2018.
［8］首都医科大学附属北京安定医院(北京市心理卫生中心中国药物依赖治疗中心). 中医五行(形)人面部表型分类量化规范［EB/OL］. (2022－12－29) ［2024－01－17］. https://www.ccopyright.com.cn/publicInquiry.html.
［9］ Posner M I, Cohen Y A. Components of visual orienting［J］. Attent Perfor, 1984, 32: 531－556.
［10］ Prime D J, Visser T A W, Ward L M. Reorienting attention and inhibition of return［J］. Percept Psychophys, 2006, 68(8): 1310－1323.
［11］ Shura R D, Brearly T W, Rowland J A, et al. RBANS validity indices: a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］. Neuropsychol Rev, 2018, 28(3): 269－284.
［12］ Long N M, Kuhl B A. Bottom-up and top-down factors differentially influence stimulus representations across large-scale attentional networks［J］. J Neurosci, 2018, 38(10): 2495－2504.
［13］ Bast N, Poustka L, Freitag C M. The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system as pacemaker of attention － a developmental mechanism of derailed attentional function in autism spectrum disorder［J］. Eur J Neurosci, 2018, 47(2): 115－125.
［14］ Wang Z G, Klein R M. Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: a review［J］. Vision Res, 2010, 50(2): 220－228.
［15］ Taylor T L, Therrien M E. Inhibition of return for faces［J］. Percept Psychophys, 2005, 67(8): 1414－1422.
［16］ Sapir A, Jackson K, Butler J, et al. Inhibition of return affects contrast sensitivity［J］. Q J Exp Psychol, 2014, 67: 1305－1316.
［17］李娜, 代嘉幸, 张丽华. 攻击性信息对脆弱型高自尊大学生返回抑制的影响机制［J］. 心理科学, 2019, 42(1): 102－108.
［18］许慎. 说文解字［M］. 北京: 中华书局, 1978: 114.
［19］李佳佳, 贾竑晓, Han J D J, 等. 中医五形人“木形人”之亚型内涵解析［J］. 中华中医药杂志, 2024, 39(2): 988－991.
［20］ Swift V, Wilson K E, Peterson J B. Zooming in on the attentional foundations of the Big Five［J］. Pers Individ Dif, 2020, 164: 110000.
［21］ Nawroth C, Prentice P M, McElligott A G. Individual personality differences in goats predict their performance in visual learning and non-associative cognitive tasks［J］. Behav Processes, 2017, 134: 43－53.
［22］刘艳丽, 陆桂芝, 刘勇. 结构需求: 概念、测量及与相关变量的关系［J］. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(2): 228－241.
［23］ Slijkhuis J M, Rietzschel E F, Van Yperen N W. How evaluation and need for structure affect motivation and creativitys［J］. Eur J Work Organ Psy, 2013, 22(1):15-25.
［24］张文杰. 高血压病中医五形人论治举隅［J］. 中华中医药杂志, 2018, 33(3): 983－985.
［25］柳洪胜, 白文, 戴中, 等. 173例基于冠脉造影的冠心病患者中医五行人体质分析［J］. 中华中医药杂志, 2016, 31(7): 2752－2753.
［26］钟华发, 高玉广. 运用五行针灸治疗失眠的临床观察［J］. 广西中医药大学学报, 2014, 17(4): 64－65.
［27］刘泰, 周芝, 高玉广, 等. 五行针刺法治疗卒中后抑郁症随机对照临床研究［J］. 四川中医, 2016, 34(10): 176－178.
［28］ Sanchez A, Vazquez C, Marker C, et al. Attentional disengagement predicts stress recovery in depression: an eye-tracking study［J］. J Abnorm Psychol, 2013, 122(2): 303－313.
［29］谢明强. 高中生人格特质、结构需求与学业焦虑关系研究［D］. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2017.
［30］简鹏. 小议匡调元教授的新中医体质观［J］. 光明中医, 2013, 28(5): 906－907.
［31］王琦. 9种基本中医体质类型的分类及其诊断表述依据［J］. 北京中医药大学学报, 2005, 28(4): 1－8.

[1]	吴子遥, 冯思同, 董麟瑞, 郑思思, 宁艳哲, 贾竑晓. 亚健康脾气虚证认知功能及社会功能的研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(3): 453-457.
[2]	滕飞, 宋明康, 吕宏蓬, 贾竑晓. 人格特质与认知功能的相关性研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(3): 466-471.
[3]	吴涵, 王雪, 王丹, 王雯, 金文青, 姜玮, 任艳萍. 抑郁发作患者认知功能对自杀行为的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(1): 61-67.
[4]	段宇航, 吕宏蓬, 滕飞, 戴芷晴, 林锦, 贾竑晓. 中医五行人之火行人与水行人认知功能差异比较研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(1): 111-117.

中医五行人之木行人与金行人认知功能差异比较研究

A study on the differences of cognitive functions between individuals dominated by Wood Element and Metal Element among the Five Elements people

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价