宫腔镜辅助下分段诊刮术与单纯分段诊刮术诊断子宫内膜癌的比较

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 519-521.

宫腔镜辅助下分段诊刮术与单纯分段诊刮术诊断子宫内膜癌的比较

高婉丽, 冯力民, 王伟娟, 李晶华, 刘小春

首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院妇产科

收稿日期:2003-08-26 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-10-15 发布日期:2004-10-15

Comparative Analysis of Hysteroscopy and Dilatation and Curettage and Traditional D&C in Diagnosis of Endometrial Carcinoma

Gao Wanli, Feng Limin, Wang Weijuan, Li Jinghua, Liu Xiaochun

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Affiliate of Capital University of Medical Sciences

Received:2003-08-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-10-15 Published:2004-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为比较宫腔镜辅助下分段诊刮术与单纯分段诊刮术在诊断子宫内膜癌中的临床意义,将经手术后病理证实的子宫内膜癌患者分为2组:宫腔镜辅助下分段诊刮组(A组)31例;单纯分段诊刮组(B组)39例.比较2组术前诊断子宫内膜癌的准确性及开腹手术时腹水细胞学的检查结果.2组患者的年龄、临床病理分期、病理分级及组织学类型差异无显著性.A组诊断宫颈受累的准确率为96.77%(30/31),假阳性率为3.23%(1/31);B组分别为79.49%(31/39),15.38%(6/39).2组准确率比较,差异有显著性(P<0.05).取腹水或腹腔冲洗液行细胞学检查.A组细胞学阳性率为6.45%(2/31),B组为14.29%(3/21),2组间差异无显著性(P>0.05).提示:宫腔镜辅助下分段诊刮术可提高术前诊断子宫内膜癌的准确性,从而避免不必要地扩大手术范围,而且不增加腹腔内播散的危险.

关键词: 宫腔镜检查, 子宫内膜肿瘤, 诊断, 刮宫

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the value of hysteroscopy and dilatation and curettage and traditional D&C in diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Seventy patients with endometrial cancer were diagnosed and the operations were performed in our department. They were divided into two groups. Group A(31 patients) was examined by hysteroscopy, group B(39 patients) by D&C. There was no statistic difference in patients age, stage, grade and histological type of the disease between the two groups. Of group A, the accuracy rate for diagnosis of cervical canal involvement was 96.77%(30/31), the false positive rate was 3.23%(1/31). While in group B, the rate was 79.49%(31/39) and 15.38%(6/39) respectively. There was statistic difference (P<0.05) between two groups in estimating the involvement of cervical canal. There was no statistic difference (P>0.05) between two groups in positive peritoneal cytology. The hysteroscopy can discover the involvement of cervical mucosa more accurately in endometrial carcinoma patients, thus avoid unnecessary treatment, but the positive peritoneal cytology rate isn't improved.

Key words: hysteroscopy, endometrial neoplasms, diagnosis, dilatation and curettage

中图分类号:

R737.33

高婉丽;冯力民;王伟娟;李晶华;刘小春. 宫腔镜辅助下分段诊刮术与单纯分段诊刮术诊断子宫内膜癌的比较[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2004, 25(4): 519-521.

Gao Wanli;Feng Limin;Wang Weijuan;Li Jinghua;Liu Xiaochun. Comparative Analysis of Hysteroscopy and Dilatation and Curettage and Traditional D&C in Diagnosis of Endometrial Carcinoma[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2004, 25(4): 519-521.

[1]	罗诗雨, 李眉, 罗莎, 王爽, 张娟, 李萌, 南潇, 鲜军舫. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT在脉络膜黑色素瘤与脉络膜转移癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(6): 867-872.
[2]	钱坤, 赵昕, 谭晓刚, 田笑如, 刘幸生, 张毅. 电子计算机断层扫描引导下经皮肺穿刺活检磨玻璃结节的诊断价值[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 558-563.
[3]	谭晓刚, 张毅. 电磁导航支气管镜在肺外周病变诊断及治疗的临床应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 570-575.
[4]	李云飞, 黄晓武, 夏恩兰. 经阴道内镜手术在无性生活生育年龄女性子宫内病变的临床应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 658-663.
[5]	田明, 孔秋, 候晓晓, 苗劲蔚. 良、恶性卵巢甲状腺肿的临床和病理特征分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 343-349.
[6]	侯磊, 王小新, 刘丽恒, 张为远, 王欣. 134例生长受限胎儿产前诊断结果分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 375-379.
[7]	吕晗, 赵鹏飞, 尹红霞, 王振常. 耳科影像学的关键技术创新和应用——2020年度国家科学技术进步奖二等奖[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 13-16.
[8]	高广程, 孙欣, 许颖, 禚风麟. 女性外阴巨大溃疡临床分析和经验总结[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1046-1052.
[9]	李云飞, 夏恩兰, 黄晓武. 绝经后异常子宫出血患者的临床与病理分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(6): 1060-1064.
[10]	刘翕然, 徐雁, 王维治, 王丽华, 张美妮, 李春阳, 董会卿, 李国忠, 刘洪波, 付锦, 金涛, 管阳太, 檀国军, 郭力, 张星虎. 中国多发性硬化临床特点及诊断难点分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(3): 360-366.
[11]	侯磊, 李介岩, 邢宇, 刘丽恒, 王欣. 22q11.2微缺失综合征胎儿的超声特征[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 183-187.
[12]	王观筠, 杨晖, 陈佳欣, 肖文田, 李灿, 姚树林, 王瑞民, 徐白萱. 眼附属器淋巴瘤¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT的代谢特征及其与临床分期的相关性[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(1): 21-25.
[13]	张景辉, 金岚, 李俊, 吴国聪, 杨鋆, 姚宏伟, 杨盈赤, 张忠涛. 开腹腹部手术延迟性术后肠麻痹的危险因素分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 636-640.
[14]	马佳, 杨敬春, 吴静, 常莹, 杜岚, 陈述. 超声诊断先天性肾旋转异常的方法探讨[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 647-651.
[15]	刘景院, 郭贺冰, 李昂. 危重型新型冠状病毒肺炎的诊疗进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 321-327.