首都医科大学学报 ›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 528-530.

• 论著·临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

MAR与IBT2种方法检测抗精子抗体的比较研究

马乐, 赵丽红, 李坚, 吴建淮, 任爱国   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2003-11-19 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-10-15 发布日期:2004-10-15

Comparison of MAR-AsAb and IBT-AsAb for Detecting AsAb

Ma Le, Zhao Lihong, Li Jian, Wu Jianhuai, Ren Aiguo   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Affiliate of Capital University of Medical Sciences
  • Received:2003-11-19 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-10-15 Published:2004-10-15

摘要: 通过比较国产MAR-AsAb试剂盒与进口IBT-AsAb试剂盒,验证国产MAR-AsAb试剂盒的真实性和可靠性.以进口IBT-AsAb试剂盒为对照,对420例不育症患者精液标本进行检测,比较抗精子抗体检出情况.发现:国产MAR-AsAb试剂盒与进口IBT-AsAb试剂盒,阳性率分别为8.8%和8.3%,经配对χ2检验无显著差异(P>0.05).国产MAR-AsAb试剂盒灵敏度为94.6%,特异度为100%.同一份精液标本重复检测10次,变异系数CV=2.59%.提示:国产MAR-AsAb试剂盒灵敏度高、特异性好、重复性高,符合临床诊断的要求.

关键词: 混合抗球蛋白反应试验, 免疫珠试验, 抗精子抗体, 免疫性不育

Abstract: The aim was to investigate the authenticity and reliability of homebred MAR-AsAb kit, MAR-AsAb kit and IBT-AsAb(USA) kit were compared. AsAb was detected in 420 patients, IBT-AsAb(USA) were used as control. The positive rate of MAR was 8.6%, and the IBT was 8.3%. There was no difference between MAR and IBT, P>0.05. The same sperm was tested 10 times, CV was 2.59%. It suggests that MAR has high sensitivity and specificity and is fit for the clinical diagnose.

Key words: MAR, IBT, anti-sperm antibody, immunological infertility

中图分类号: