首都医科大学学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 352-355.

• 传染病及相关慢性疾病研究进展 • 上一篇    下一篇

糖化血清白蛋白、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白在肝源性糖尿病中的意义

何玉兰1△,赵娟2△,刘雪梅2,张汾燕3,李娟2,于红卫2,王金环2,孟庆华2*   

  1. 1. 北京市平谷区医院感染科,北京 101200; 2. 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院重症肝病科,北京 100069; 3. 北京老年病医院消化科,北京 100095
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-06-21 发布日期:2011-06-21
  • 通讯作者: 孟庆华

Clinical significance of GA, FBG, HbA1c in evaluating hepatogenic diabetes carbohydrate metabolic disturbance

HE Yu-lan1△, ZHAO Juan1△, LIU Xue-mei2, ZHANG Fen-yan2, LI Juan2, YU Hong-wei2, WANG Jin-huan2, MENG Qing-hua2*   

  1. 1. Department of Infection Disease, Beijing Pinggu Hospital, Beijing 101200, China; 2. Department of Severe Liver Disease,Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; 3. Department of Digestive Internal Medicine,Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing 100095, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-06-21 Published:2011-06-21
  • Contact: MENG Qing-hua

摘要: 目的 比较肝源性糖尿病患者与肝炎肝硬化患者血清中的糖化血清白蛋白(glycosylated serum,GA)、空腹血糖(fasting blood glucose,FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(glycosylated hemoglobin,HbA1c)浓度,评价其在监测肝源性糖尿病糖代谢过程中的意义。
方法 以27例肝源性糖尿病及54例肝炎肝硬化患者为研究对象,取入院患者次日晨起空腹血清分别检测GA、FBG、HbA1c。
结果 ① 肝源性糖尿病组GA值、HbA1c值均明显高于对照组,2组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。② 肝源性糖尿病组,FBG大于7.0 mmol/L者占66.7%(18/27);HbA1c大于6.5%者占22.2% (6/27);GA高于16.87%者占92.6%(25/27)。肝硬化组FBG大于7.0 mmol/L者占3.7%(2/54);HbA1c大于6.5%者占1.8%(1/54);GA高于16.87%占25.9%(14/54)。
结论F BG和HbA1c对于肝源性糖尿病诊断的特异度高,灵敏度低,GA对于肝源性糖尿病诊断的灵敏度高,但特异度低,所以对肝源性糖尿病的诊断三个检测指标结合使用更有价值。

关键词: 肝源性糖尿病, 糖化血清白蛋白, 糖化血红蛋白, 空腹血糖

Abstract: Objective To compare the abnormal metabolism of glucose(fasting blood glucose, FBG; hemoglobin A1c, HbA1c and glycated albumin, GA) of patients with hepatogenic diabetes(HD) and patients with liver cirrhosis(LC), to estimate their significances in evaluating hepatogenic diabetes carbohydrate metabolic disturbance.
Methods Eighty-one patients from Beijing Youan Hospital were enrolled in this study, among whom 27 had definite diagnosis of hepatogenic diabetes and 54 patients with liver cirrhosis were enrolled into control group. Clinical data of the patients were collected during hospitalization, blood-test of FBG, HbA1c, GA were obtained in the next morning of admission.
Results GA and HbA1c in patients with hepatogenic diabetes were significantly higher than those of patients with cirrhosis(P<0.01). In the hepatogenic diabetes group, FBG was higher than 7.0 mmol/L in 18 cases(accounting for 66.7%), HbA1c greater than 6.5% in 96 cases(accounting for 22.2%); GA was higher than 16.87% in 25 cases(accounting for 92.6%). In cirrhosis group, FBG was higher than 7.0 mmol/L in 2 cases(accounting for 3.7%), HbA1c was higher than 6.5% in 1 case(accounting for 1.85% ), GA was higher than 16.87% in 14 cases(accounting for 25.9%).
Conclusion FBG and HbA1c had a high specificity in hepatogenic diabetes monitoring, but had a low sensitivity. While GA had a high sensitivity and low specificity. It would be more helpful when combining GA, FBG and HbA1c in hepatogenic diabetes monitoring.

Key words: hepatogenic diabetes, glycated albumin, glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose

中图分类号: