影像引导下蝶腭神经节联合选择性颈神经阻滞治疗蝶腭神经痛的回顾性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2020.02.022

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 272-276.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2020.02.022

影像引导下蝶腭神经节联合选择性颈神经阻滞治疗蝶腭神经痛的回顾性分析

赖光辉, 张达谦, 倪家骧

首都医科大学宣武医院疼痛科, 北京 100053

收稿日期:2019-08-07 出版日期:2020-04-21 发布日期:2020-04-16
通讯作者: 倪家骧 E-mail:nijiaxiang@263.net

Retrospective analysis of image-guided sphenopalatine ganglion combined with selective cervical nerve block in the treatment of sphenopalatine neuralgia

Lai Guanghui, Zhang Daqian, Ni Jiaxiang

Department of Pain Management, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China

Received:2019-08-07 Online:2020-04-21 Published:2020-04-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的回顾性分析影像引导下蝶腭神经节及颈神经阻滞对于顽固性蝶腭神经痛（sphenopalatine neuralgia，SPN）的治疗效果。方法对22例蝶腭神经痛患者，行C型臂或电子计算机断层扫描（computed tomography，CT）定位侧入路穿刺行蝶腭神经阻滞及超声引导颈2-颈5颈神经阻滞和颈椎关节突关节注射治疗（1~3次，每周1次）。随访时间2~64个月，平均（38.86±16.08）个月，记录术后24 h、1个月、3个月、6个月、1年、2年、3年时数字量表（numerical rating scale，NRS）评分，评价治疗效果并观察治疗后不良反应（包括面部血肿、视力障碍、颅内感染、体位性血压等）发生情况。结果术后24 h、1个月、3个月、6个月、1年、2年、3年，NRS评分较术前显著降低（P<0.01），治疗有效率分别为95.45%（21/22）、90.9%（20/22）、95.24%（20/21）、95.24%（20/21）、100%（20/20）、100%（19/19）、100%（17/17），术后2例（9.09%）患者出现轻度血肿，经过24 h冰敷后完全消退，未发生其他不良反应。结论 C-型臂X线或CT引导蝶腭神经阻滞联合颈椎旁及关节突关节注射是治疗顽固性蝶腭神经痛的一种安全、有效、持续时间长、患者乐于接受的微创治疗方法。

关键词: 蝶腭神经痛, 蝶腭神经节, 神经阻滞, 超声引导, 颈椎旁, 颈椎关节突关节

Abstract: Objective To retrospectively analysis the therapeutic effect for viable sphenopalatine neuralgia (SPN) by image-guided (C-arm or CT-guided)sphenopalatine ganglion block combined with selective cervical paravertebral nerve block and cervical joint injection. Methods Totally 22 patients with sphenopalatine neuralgia underwent C-arm guided sphenopalatine ganglion block combined with ultrasound-guided nerve block of cervical 2-5 and cervical joint injection(1-3times,once a week). Numeric rating scales(NRS) was obtained at 24 hours, 1 month,3 months, 6 months,1 year,2 years, and 3 years after nerve block. The telephone follow-up lasted for 3-64 months,with average of (38.86±16.08) months. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated, and the post-therapy adverse reaction was recorded. Results NRS scores significantly decreased after treatment at 24 hours, 1 month,3 months,6 months 1 year,2 years and 3 years. The effective rate after procedure was 95.45%(21/22),90.9%(20/22),95.24%(20/21),95.24%(20/21),100%(20/20),100%(19/19),100%(17/17)at 24 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months 1 year,2 years and 3 years, respectively. Two (9.09%)patients presented with mild facial hematoma, which were completely relieved after ice compresses applied for 24 hours. No other adverse reaction was found. Conclusion C-arm or CT-guided sphenopalatine ganglion block combined with ultrasound-guided cervical paravertebral nerve block and cervical joint injection for viable SPN could relieve the pain completely, which could last for long time. It is a safe, effective, and stable mini-invasive therapy.

Key words: sphenopalatine neuralgia, sphenopalatine ganglion, nerve block, ultrasound-guided, cervical paravertebral, cervical joint

中图分类号:

R614.4

赖光辉, 张达谦, 倪家骧. 影像引导下蝶腭神经节联合选择性颈神经阻滞治疗蝶腭神经痛的回顾性分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 272-276.

Lai Guanghui, Zhang Daqian, Ni Jiaxiang. Retrospective analysis of image-guided sphenopalatine ganglion combined with selective cervical nerve block in the treatment of sphenopalatine neuralgia[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2020, 41(2): 272-276.

参考文献

[1] 匡培根.丛集性头痛[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2002,8(1):39-42.
[2] Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders:2nd edition[J].Cephalalgia, 2004,24,(Suppl 1):9-160.
[3] 刘焕亭,刘军,费昶,等,翼腭窝的解剖及应用[J].山东医药,2009,49(42):1-2.
[4] 李华斌,许庚.翼腭窝的应用解剖学[J].国外医学耳鼻咽喉科学分册,2000,24(2):66-68.
[5] 陈士文,徐锦程.翼腭窝区的应用解剖研究[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2011,36(7):687-692.
[6] Arkink E B, Schmitz N, Schoonman G G, et al. The anterior hypothalamus in cluster headache[J]. Cephalalgia, 2017,37(11):1039-1050.
[7] Barloese M C. Neurobiology and sleep disorders in cluster headache[J]. Headache Pain, 2015, 16(1):1-16.
[8] Barloese M C J, Jürgens T P, May A, et al. Cluster headache attack remission with sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation:experiences in chronic cluster headache patients through 24 months[J]. J Headache Pain, 2016,17(1):67.
[9] Paemeleire K,Goodman A M.Results of a patient survey for an implantable neurostimulator to treat migraine headaches.[J].Headache Pain,2012,13(3):239-241.
[10] Cady R K,Saper J,Dexter K,et al.Long-term efficacy of a double-blind,placebo-controlled,randomized study for repetitive sphenopalatine blockade with bupivacaine VS.saline with the Tx360 device for treatment of chronic migraine[J].Headache,2015,55(4):529-542.
[11] 王志福,郑美风,陈跃,等.针刺蝶腭神经节治疗变应性鼻炎综述[J].福建中医学院学报,2006, 16(3):59-60.
[12] 李娜,郭玉娜,秦红军,等. CT引导下蝶腭神经节射频热凝术治疗蝶腭神经痛的长期疗效及安全性分析[J].中国全科医学,2016,19(12):1375-1378.
[13] 孙艳红,王海艳.颈源性头痛程度与颈椎生理曲度异常的相关性研究[J].海南医学,2017,28(5):755-757.

影像引导下蝶腭神经节联合选择性颈神经阻滞治疗蝶腭神经痛的回顾性分析

Retrospective analysis of image-guided sphenopalatine ganglion combined with selective cervical nerve block in the treatment of sphenopalatine neuralgia

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马艳辉, 吴洁, 贾宾, 姚东旭, 徐娜, 王天龙, 陈健, 吴迪. 超声引导股动脉穿刺置管在血管内介入方法制备恒河猴急性脑梗死模型中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 239-242.
[2]	张鹏, 杨威, 王奎吉, 谭翊, 商晓娟, 舒凝, 汪芗, 许世闻, 孙三峰, 赵新雨, 於堃, 陈陆泉. 针刺蝶腭神经节治疗变应性鼻炎的多中心病例系列研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(6): 916-920.
[3]	谢海, 李艳. 超声引导下不同入路腹横肌平面阻滞对剖宫产手术后镇痛的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2015, 36(5): 791-793.
[4]	岳剑宁, 武百山, 王琦, 郭玉娜, 刘京杰, 何明伟, 李玄英, 倪家骧. 超声引导下星状神经节阻滞有效性及安全性评价[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2014, 35(1): 32-34.
[5]	兰飞, 王天龙. 0.5%罗哌卡因用于超声引导经臀下入路坐骨神经阻滞的半数有效剂量[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013, 34(5): 666-668.
[6]	蔡垣星;李蕾;孙磊;程庆好;史健;杜平;李宝琴. 罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼对神经丛阻滞效果的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2009, 30(2): 252-255.
[7]	王明刚;陈杰;刘素君;申英末;包少瑜;朱大伟. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在老年腹股沟疝患者无张力修补术中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2008, 29(6): 770-772.
[8]	王纲;王保国. 庆大霉素与复方倍他米松治疗原发性三叉神经痛的早期疗效对比研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2008, 29(5): 646-649.
[9]	王立新;王保国. 头部神经阻滞联合曲马多PCA对术后疼痛的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2007, 28(1): 128-130.
[10]	胡贵芝;孙燕霞;杨静;年阿兴;张炳熙. 异丙酚在老龄患者球后神经阻滞中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2005, 26(3): 341-343.