首都医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 367-372.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.03.005

• 神经病学基础与临床 • 上一篇    下一篇

音乐疗法联合强光治疗对阿尔茨海默病患者睡眠障碍的疗效观察

胡月青, 吕继辉*, 王嫱, 马宗娟, 李文杰, 母海燕, 李沫, 高文超, 贾东梅   

  1. 北京老年医院认知障碍诊疗中心,北京 100095
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-17 出版日期:2021-06-21 发布日期:2021-06-16
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail:lvjihui@139.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展科研专项资助(2020-2-2191),北京老年医院“525”人才培养基金(2018-016)。

Efficacy of music therapy combined with bright light therapy on sleep disorders in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Hu Yueqing, Lyu Jihui*, Wang Qiang, Ma Zongjuan, Li Wenjie, Mu Haiyan, Li Mo, Gao Wenchao, Jia Dongmei   

  1. Center for Cognitive Disorders, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing 100095, China
  • Received:2021-03-17 Online:2021-06-21 Published:2021-06-16
  • Contact: *E-mail:lvjihui@139.com
  • Supported by:
    Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2020-2-2191),Beijing Geriatric Hospital “525” Talent Training Fund(2018-016).

摘要: 目的 探讨音乐疗法联合强光治疗对中、重度阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer's disease, AD)患者睡眠障碍的临床疗效。方法 将120例伴睡眠障碍的中、重度AD患者采用数字表法随机分为4组,即常规治疗组(对照组)、音乐组、强光组、联合治疗组,每组30例。4组患者均接受常规治疗,其中音乐组辅以睡前聆听舒缓音乐,强光组辅以上午强光照射,联合治疗组同期辅以音乐疗法和强光治疗。4组患者治疗前、连续治疗4周后均接受匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI)评估。该量表得分越高,提示睡眠障碍越严重。结果 治疗前4组患者基线资料、PSQI总分及各成分得分组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前后差值的组间比较,联合治疗组催眠药物得分下降程度高于强光组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而PSQI总分及其他成分得分差值组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);联合治疗组与强光组在PSQI总分、睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠效率及日间功能的得分值下降较音乐组和对照组明显,音乐组PSQI总分及催眠药物得分较对照组下降明显,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对伴随睡眠障碍的中、重度AD患者在常规治疗的基础上辅以音乐疗法联合强光治疗,可以有效改善其整体睡眠质量;单纯音乐疗法或强光治疗仅对中、重度AD患者睡眠障碍的某些成分有效。

关键词: 阿尔茨海默病, 睡眠障碍, 音乐疗法, 强光治疗

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of combination therapy with music therapy (MT) and bright light therapy (BLT) on sleep disorders in patients with moderate-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods A total of 120 patients with moderate or severe AD accompanied with sleep disorders were randomly divided into 4 groups: routine therapy group (control group), MT group, BLT group, and combination therapy group. All patients in the 4 groups received routine treatment. Besides listening to soothing music for 30 minutes before bedtime was supplemented to the MT group, while bright light exposure in the morning for 30 minutes was supplemented to the BLT group; Both MT and BLT were performed in the combination therapy group. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was evaluated before and after the intervention which lasted for 4 consecutive weeks. Results The baseline characteristics, scores of PSQI and its subscores had no significant difference in the pre-intervention assessment among 4 groups (P>0.05). In the comparison of the difference between pre- and post-intervention, the decrease of the score of sleep medication in the combination therapy group was higher than that in the BLT group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05), while in the comparison of the PSQI total score and the scores of other components between the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, the scores of PSQI, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep efficacy and daytime dysfunction in the combination therapy group and BLT group decreased more significantly than those in the MT group and the control group (P<0.05). The score of PSQI and sleep medication in the MT group decreased significantly compared with the control group, and the differences were both statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The routine treatment supplemented by MT in combination with BLT can effectively improve the overall sleep quality for patients with moderate or severe AD accompanied with sleep disorders, but MT or BLT alone is only effective for certain components of sleep disorders.

Key words: Alzheimer's disease, sleep disorders, music therapy, bright light therapy

中图分类号: