31例新型冠状病毒感染病例咽拭子与痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2020.03.003

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 336-339.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2020.03.003

• 新型冠状病毒肺炎的诊断、治疗及预后 • 上一篇下一篇

31例新型冠状病毒感染病例咽拭子与痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较

郭晶晶¹, 方茜¹, 刘亚楠¹, 曲沛¹, 马雪瀛¹, 王爽¹, 方伟¹, 周茹¹, 张响¹, 汤云霞², 杨思园², 于凤婷², 王雅杰¹

1. 首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院检验科, 北京 100015;
2. 首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院感染急诊中心实验室, 北京 100015

收稿日期:2020-03-20 出版日期:2020-06-21 发布日期:2020-06-17
通讯作者: 王雅杰 E-mail:wangyajie@ccmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
北京市医院管理中心新型冠状病毒肺炎科技攻关项目（COVID-19-BHA05），北京市科学技术委员会新型冠状病毒感染肺炎项目（Z201100005420022，Z201100005420012）。

Comparison of throat swab and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 31 cases of 2019-nCoV infection

Guo Jingjing¹, Fang Qian¹, Liu Yanan¹, Qu Pei¹, Ma Xueying¹, Wang Shuang¹, Fang Wei¹, Zhou Ru¹, Zhang Xiang¹, Tang Yunxia², Yang Siyuan², Yu Fengting², Wang Yajie¹

1. Laboratory Department, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China;
2 Laboratory of Infection Emergency Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China

Received:2020-03-20 Online:2020-06-21 Published:2020-06-17
Supported by:
This study was supported by Beijing Hospital Management Center COVID-19 Science and Technology Project(COVID-19-BHA05), COVID-19 Science and Technology Prevention and Control Research First Batch of Emergency Projects of Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology (Z201100005420022, Z201100005420012).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较新型冠状病毒病例咽拭子标本与痰标本的病毒核酸检测结果。方法对31例新型冠状病毒确诊病例的咽拭子与痰标本分别进行病毒ORF1ab基因、N基因及人体上皮细胞（ribonucleoprotein，RNP）基因（试剂内标基因）RT-PCR核酸检测与比较。结果 31例病例的咽拭子和痰标本中，人体上皮细胞RNP基因均呈现明显典型的扩增信号曲线；病毒ORF1ab基因、N基因的检测结果：31例患者的咽拭子核酸结果中，28例患者均显示阴性，第9例和第16例患者的咽拭子为单基因阳性，第17例为双基因阳性；同时采集的痰标本结果显示，18例患者均为单基因阳性，13例患者为双基因阳性。痰标本的病毒ORF1ab基因和N基因核酸检测扩增曲线的Ct值小于咽拭子标本的Ct值。结论在开展新型冠状病毒实验室核酸检测中，痰标本的病毒含量高于咽拭子标本，其检测效果优于咽拭子标本，更能准确体现患者病情。

关键词: 新型冠状病毒, 痰标本, 咽拭子, 病毒核酸检测

Abstract: Objective To comparatively analyze the detection efficiency of viral nucleic acid in throat swab and sputum sample of 2019-novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV) cases. Methods Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) gene in human epithelial cells, viral ORF1ab genes and N genes were tested and compared with real-time PCR in throat swabs and sputum specimens from 31 confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV. Results In the throat swabs and sputum samples of 31 cases, the RNP gene of human epithelial cells showed obvious and typical amplification signal curves. In the detection of viral ORF1ab gene and N gene, the amplification signal of sputum samples was stronger than that of throat swab, and the cycle threshold (Ct) value of amplification curve was lower than that of throat swab, especially in case 9 and 16 were single gene positive, the pharyngeal swabs of the 9th and 16th patients were single gene positive, and the 17th patient was double gene positive, and the rest of the 28 patients were negative. Sputum specimens collected at the same time showed that all the 18 patients were single gene positive and 13 were double gene positive. Conclusion In the viral nucleic acid testing of 2019-nCoV laboratory detection, the virus content in sputum specimens was higher than that in throat swab specimens, and the detection efficiency was higher than that in throat swab specimens.

Key words: new coronavirus (2019-nCOV), sputum specimen, throat swab, viral nucleic acid test

中图分类号:

R563.1

郭晶晶, 方茜, 刘亚楠, 曲沛, 马雪瀛, 王爽, 方伟, 周茹, 张响, 汤云霞, 杨思园, 于凤婷, 王雅杰. 31例新型冠状病毒感染病例咽拭子与痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 336-339.

Guo Jingjing, Fang Qian, Liu Yanan, Qu Pei, Ma Xueying, Wang Shuang, Fang Wei, Zhou Ru, Zhang Xiang, Tang Yunxia, Yang Siyuan, Yu Fengting, Wang Yajie. Comparison of throat swab and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 31 cases of 2019-nCoV infection[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2020, 41(3): 336-339.

参考文献

[1] De Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D,et al. SARS and MERS:recent insights into emerging coronaviruses[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2016,14:523-534.
[2] Wang C, Horby P W, Hayden F G, et al. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern[J]. Lancet, 2020,395(10223):470-473.
[3] Huang C,Wang Y, Li X,et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China[J]. Lancet, 2020,395(10223):497-506.
[4] Chan J F, Yuan S, Kok K H, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission:a study of a family cluster[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223):514-523.
[5] 张乐海. 2019新型冠状病毒的基因组学初探[J].国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2020(47):1.
[6] 北京市疾控中心.北京市新型冠状病毒检测技术指南(第一版)[S].北京:北京市疾控中心,2020.
[7] 疾病预防控制局.新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎实验室检测技术指南[R].3版.北京:国家卫生健康委办公厅,2020.
[8] Li X G. Transmission dynamics and evolutionary history of 2019-nCoV[J]. Med Virol, 2020, 92:501-511.
[9] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎纳入法定传染病管理[EB/OL].(2020-01-20)[2020-02-05]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7915/202001/e4e2d5e6f01147e0a8df3f6701d49f33.shtml.
[10] Hui D S, Madani T A, Ntoumi F, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health-the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China[J]. Int J Infect Dis,2020,91:264-266.
[11] Jon C, Dennis N. New SARS-like virus in China triggers alarm[J]. Science, 2020,367(6475):234-235.
[12] Tang B. Estimation of the transmission Risk of 2019-nCov and its implication for public health interventions[J]. J Clin Med,2020, 9(2):462.
[13] Fan C Y, Liu L P, Guo W,et al. Prediction of epidemic spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus driven by spring festival transportation in China:A Population-Based Study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2020, 17(5):1679.
[14] Wang W E, Tang J M, Wei F Q. Updated understanding of the outbreak 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, China[J]. J Med Virol, 2020, 92(4):441-447.
[15] Talha K B. Coronavirus in China[J].News,2020,8(3):238.

31例新型冠状病毒感染病例咽拭子与痰标本病毒核酸检测的比较

Comparison of throat swab and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 31 cases of 2019-nCoV infection

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邱雅若, 李星霖, 陈丹瑛, 刘永梅, 宋焱君, 李国力, 宋川, 王玺, 赵学森. 新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株利用多种动物ACE2作为受体侵入细胞的能力[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 421-426.
[2]	王爽, 潘阳, 徐新民, 栗雅杰, 周淳, 张悦, 王雅杰. 新型冠状病毒核酸PCR检测假阳性核酸污染类型的鉴别方法[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 427-432.
[3]	刘珊珊, 陈旭, 李亚琼, 袁晓菲, 于红晔, 房萌. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间北京市青少年抑郁焦虑情况调查及影响因素[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(3): 412-417.
[4]	陈剑明, 陈腾飞, 连博, 陈奕杉, 徐霄龙, 刘清泉. 新型冠状病毒肺炎中医证候和证候要素分布特点的文献分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(6): 901-907.
[5]	尹星琪, 于彩果, 柯静, 赵冬, 于可. 2型糖尿病患者新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期间心理状态及行为调查[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(6): 970-977.
[6]	姚春勇, 李杨帆, 贾原菊. 66例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者临床特点及胸部电子计算机断层扫描影像表现分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(6): 997-1001.
[7]	慕萌, 张俊敏, 陈瑞芳, 孙超渊. 医学类科技期刊应对新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的策略分析——以《首都医科大学学报》为例[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(6): 1033-1036.
[8]	安彦虹, 戎冬冬, 单艺, 武春雪, 高艳, 卢洁. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疑似与确诊患者的胸部X线表现比较[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 608-612.
[9]	胡琪, 钟正, 刘激扬, 汤渝玲, 周志国, 刘萍, 阎昱升, 李波. 57例新型冠状病毒肺炎治愈患者胸部电子计算机断层扫描特征报告[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 627-630.
[10]	杨毅, 鲁旭然, 刘楠, 侯晓彤, 孙立忠, 吴龙, 潘友民, 王守凤, 赵欣艳. 新型冠状病毒肺炎对心血管系统影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 657-663.
[11]	刘景院, 郭贺冰, 李昂. 危重型新型冠状病毒肺炎的诊疗进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 321-327.
[12]	刘景院, 郭贺冰, 李昂. 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗的若干思考[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 328-335.
[13]	吕志彬, 关春爽, 闫铄, 陈七一, 李晶晶, 张羽君, 陈步东, 谢汝明. 人工智能在CT预测新型冠状病毒肺炎转归中的价值[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 340-344.
[14]	李新刚, 徐艳利, 王琳, 周洋, 杨莉, 谭大伟, 陈志海, 宋蕊. 糖皮质激素在新型冠状病毒肺炎重型患者治疗中的临床研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(3): 345-349.
[15]	金荣华. 新型冠状病毒肺炎[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 149-154.