Preliminary exploration on peer review processes of university sci-tech journals in an open science era
Sun Chaoyuan1, Zhang Jianjun1, Chen Ruifang1, Sun Lina2
1. Editorial Office of Journal of Capital Medical University, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; 2. Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
Sun Chaoyuan, Zhang Jianjun, Chen Ruifang, Sun Lina. Preliminary exploration on peer review processes of university sci-tech journals in an open science era[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2024, 45(4): 733-736.
[1] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法(2021年修订)[EB/OL]. (2021-12-24)[2024-02-01]. https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/flfg/202201/t20220118_179043.html.
[2] Kronick D A. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism[J]. JAMA, 1990, 263(10): 1321-1322.
[3] Chapelle F H. The history and practice of peer review[J]. Ground Water, 2014, 52(1): 1.
[4] Manchikanti L, Kaye A D, Boswell M V, et al. Medical journal peer review: process and bias[J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18(1): E1-E14.
[5] Jayasinghe U W, Marsh H W, Bond N. A multilevel cross classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings[J]. J Royal Statist Soc, 2003, 166(3): 279-300.
[6] Gilbert J R, Williams E S, Lundberg G D. Is there gender bias in JAMAs peer review process?[J]. JAMA, 1994, 272(2): 139-142.
[7] Emerson G B, Warme W J, Wolf F M, et al. Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2010, 170(21): 1934-1939.
[8] 赵绍智, 曹勇. 血管内皮细胞体细胞突变与脑血管畸形[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(3): 379-384.