钛涂层复合补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中效果的前瞻性随机对照研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2018.02.026

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 299-303.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2018.02.026

钛涂层复合补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中效果的前瞻性随机对照研究

杨硕, 刘雨辰, 王明刚, 申英末, 朱熠林, 曹金鑫, 邹振玉

首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科, 北京 100043

收稿日期:2017-09-08 出版日期:2018-03-21 发布日期:2018-04-14
通讯作者: 王明刚 E-mail:zhaohaiyan99@sina.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31371162），首都医科大学燕京医学院科研启动基金（2014QD01）。

A prospective, randomized control study between titanium coating mesh and polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Yang Shuo, Liu Yuchen, Wang Minggang, Shen Yingmo, Zhu Yilin, Cao Jinxin, Zou Zhenyu

Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China

Received:2017-09-08 Online:2018-03-21 Published:2018-04-14
Supported by:
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371162),Science Foundation of Yanjing Medical College(2014QD01).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对比分析钛涂层补片与普通聚丙烯平片在经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值。方法将2016年1月至6月间共48例行腹腔镜经腹疝修补术的患者纳入本研究，采用Microsoft Excel软件中的Randbetween函数产生随机编号随机将其中24例患者应用钛涂层补片作为观察组，24例应用普通聚丙烯平片作为对照组，对比两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、住院费用、复工时间、术后合并症等指标。结果两组均顺利完成手术。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、复工时间差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05），住院费用、血清肿发生率和异物感的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后随访1年，两组病例均无术后复发、感染、慢性疼痛。观察组发生血清肿1例、异物感6例，对照组发生血清肿5例、异物感8例，观察组住院花费较对照组高（P<0.05）。结论应用钛涂层补片可减低术后血清肿和异物感的发生率，不会增加复发率，但住院花费可能相对较高，具有较高的临床应用价值。

关键词: 腹腔镜, 疝修补, 钛涂层, 聚丙烯

Abstract: Objective To compare the effect between Titanium coating mesh and polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods A total of 48 patients performed laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair from Jan. 2016 to Jun. 2016 were included into this study. All patients were divided into two groups randomly, including Titanium coating mesh group(observation group, n=24) and polypropylene mesh group(control group, n=24).The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, hospital cost, time return to work and complications were analyzed. Results All of the operations were performed successfully. No statistical difference was observed of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, time return to work between two groups(P>0.05). The difference of hospital cost, incidence of seroma and foreign body sensation were statistically(P<0.05). No recurrence, infection or chronic pain was observed at 1 year follow-up. In observation group, 1 seroma case and 6 foreign body sensation cases were observed. And in control group, 5 seroma cases and 8 foreign body sensation cases were observed, with lower hospital cost (P<0.05). Conclusion Use of Titanium coating mesh may decrease the incidence of seroma and foreign body sensation with same risk of recurrence and complications. It is worthy to be used for clinical practice although hospital cost may be higher than polypropylene mesh.

Key words: laparoscopy, hernia repair, Titanium coating, polypropylene

中图分类号:

杨硕, 刘雨辰, 王明刚, 申英末, 朱熠林, 曹金鑫, 邹振玉. 钛涂层复合补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中效果的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2018, 39(2): 299-303.

Yang Shuo, Liu Yuchen, Wang Minggang, Shen Yingmo, Zhu Yilin, Cao Jinxin, Zou Zhenyu. A prospective, randomized control study between titanium coating mesh and polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2018, 39(2): 299-303.

参考文献

[1] Jakhmola C K, Kumar A. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the Armed Forces:a 5-year single centre study[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2015,71(4):317-323.
[2] Cawich S O, Mohanty S K, Bonadie K O, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a developing nation:short-term outcomes in 103 consecutive procedures[J]. J Surg Tech Case Rep, 2013,5(1):13-17.
[3] 唐健雄,黄磊,李绍杰,等. 我国疝和腹壁外科前景展望[J]. 中华外科杂志,2017,55(1):15-19.
[4] 刘厚生, 廖秋,赵勇. Lichtenstein术在治疗腹股沟疝中的优势[J]. 首都医科大学学报,2014, 35(5):660-662.
[5] Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C. What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature[J].Hernia,2014,18(4):445-457.
[6] Tollens T, Topal H, Lucardie A,et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic repair of primary, unilateral inguinal hernia using a self-adhering mesh[J]. Surg Technol Int,2016,30:151-154.
[7] Lichtenstein I L, Shulman A G, Amid P K,et al. The tension-free hernioplasty[J]. Am J Surg, 1989,157(2):188-193.
[8] de Araújo F B, Starling E S, Maricevich M, et al. Single site and conventional totally extraperitoneal techniques for uncomplicated inguinal hernia repair:a comparative study[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2014,10(4):197-201.
[9] Bittner R, Gmähle E, Gmähle B,et al. Lightweight mesh and noninvasive fixation:an effective concept for prevention of chronic pain with laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010,24(12):2958-2964.
[10] Saber A, Hokkam E N, Ellabban G M. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for recurrent inguinal hernia:a randomized trial[J]. J Minim Access Surg,2015,11(2):123-128.
[11] O'Reilly E A, Burke J P, O'Connell P R. A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia[J]. Ann Surg, 2012,255(5):846-853.
[12] Tamme C, Garde N, Klingler A, et al. Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with titanium-coated lightweight polypropylene mesh:early results[J]. Surg Endosc, 2005,19(8):1125-1129.
[13] Schug-Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A,et al. A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias:comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model[J]. Surg Endosc,2006,20(3):402-409.
[14] Demetrashvili Z, Qerqadze V, Kamkamidze G,et al. Comparison of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias[J]. Int Surg, 2011,96(3):233-238.
[15] 王帆.靳翠红.赵凤林,等.自固定补片与钉合固定补片在巨大腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的对比研究[J].首都医科大学学报,2017,38(6):911-914.
[16] Ruiz-Jasbon F, Norrby J, Ivarsson M L,et al. Inguinal hernia repair using a synthetic long-term resorbable mesh:results from a 3-year prospective safety and performance study[J]. Hernia. 2014,18(5):723-730.
[17] Lee S D, Son T, Lee J B,et al. Comparison of partially-absorbable lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernia repair:multicenter randomized study[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res,2017,93(6):322-330.

钛涂层复合补片与普通聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中效果的前瞻性随机对照研究

A prospective, randomized control study between titanium coating mesh and polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	樊笑琪, 刘志斌, 王明帅, 瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫, 宋黎明, 邢念增, 牛亦农. 腹腔镜单纯尿道前壁加强法与尿道前后壁加强法(Sandwich法)改善前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的对比分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 542-546.
[2]	魏后忆, 孙剑, 蒋一航, 关星, 王伟, 宋黎明, 牛亦农. 腹腔镜Boari膀胱壁瓣法输尿管膀胱再植术治疗中下段输尿管尿路上皮癌的临床效果[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 547-551.
[3]	刘赛, 瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫, 牛亦农, 高建东, 崔丽艳, 宋黎明, 平浩, 杨飞亚, 王明帅, 邢念增. 加速康复外科在腹腔镜泌尿外科上尿路手术中的应用效果分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2019, 40(1): 78-83.
[4]	李凯, 许光中, 王桐生, 刘晨, 朱斌. 两种无张力疝修补手术治疗复发腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2018, 39(1): 138-142.
[5]	计嘉军, 高峡, 付建柱, 栗光明, 伍冀湘. 免气腹腹腔镜胆道探查术对患者凝血功能的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 816-820.
[6]	王帆, 靳翠红, 赵凤林, 申英末, 陈杰. 自固定补片与钉合固定补片在巨大腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的对比研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 911-914.
[7]	孙志鹏, 朱昱冰, 阿民布和, 樊庆, 李天雄, 张能维. 腹腔镜保脾胰体尾整块切除手术治疗胰腺癌的技术细节及预后[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(5): 733-739.
[8]	梁阔, 刘东斌, 刘家峰, 徐大华, 王悦华, 李非. 腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合在老年胆总管结石病人中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(1): 78-81.
[9]	李晶华, 黄文燕, 张瑞, 马雪莲, 史从宁, 李文君, 冯力民. Ⅱ型子宫黏膜下肌瘤术前超声评估MFM的临床意义[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2016, 37(4): 523-528.
[10]	刘志斌, 靳松, 张军晖, 王建文, 田溪泉, 田龙, 牛亦农, 邢念增. 腹腔镜Sandwich法尿道及周围组织重建改善高风险组前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2016, 37(3): 313-317.
[11]	李俊, 郭伟, 张军, 张忠涛. 转化医学与中国微创外科的发展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2015, 36(5): 800-804.
[12]	刘厚生, 廖秋, 赵勇. Lichtenstein术在治疗腹股沟疝中的优势[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2014, 35(5): 660-662.
[13]	邱枫, 王今. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌手术近期疗效对比[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013, 34(5): 689-692.
[14]	宋黎明, 邢念增, 牛亦农, 张军晖, 田溪泉, 王建文. 后腹腔镜手术Ⅰ期治疗双侧肾癌2例并文献复习[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013, 34(3): 372-375.
[15]	金讯波, 张慧. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术中肾血管处理方法的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013, 34(3): 376-379.