术中吸氧浓度对行脑血管再通术患者术后神经功能和并发症的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2023.05.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨术中常压高氧（normobaric hyperoxia，NBO）作为辅助神经保护策略联合血管内再通术治疗缺血性脑血管病（ischemic cerebrovascular disease, ICVD）患者的安全性和有效性。方法本研究为单中心回顾性队列研究，共纳入2016年1月至2021年9月就诊于首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院，全身麻醉（以下简称全麻）下行血管内再通治疗、年龄≥60岁及手术时长≥2 h 的ICVD 患者351例，依据术中吸氧浓度不同，分为H组（100%O2，109例）和L组（50%O2，242例），采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表（National Institute of Health Stroke Scale，NIHSS）评分评估患者神经功能缺损程度，改良Rankin评分量表（modified Rankin Scale，mRS）评分评估患者神经功能恢复状况。比较术后和出院时两组患者NIHSS评分及mRS评分的差异和相关术后并发症（肺炎、再卒中、脑出血）发生情况，利用Spearman相关分析探讨与术后NIHSS评分相关的因素。结果术后和出院时，两组患者NIHSS评分、mRS评分及术后并发症发生率比较，差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；与H组比较，L组住院时间明显缩短（P＜0.05）。术后与NIHSS评分相关的因素为氧浓度、急/平诊、术前狭窄率、狭窄长度、高血脂、术前NIHSS评分、术前mRS评分。结论虽然常压高氧作为ICVD患者血管再通治疗基础上的辅助神经保护策略作用有限，对患者近期神经功能恢复无显著影响，但也未增加术后并发症的发生率。

关键词: 常压高氧, 缺血性脑血管病, 美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分, Rankin评分量表评分

Abstract: Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of intraoperative normobaric hyperoxia as an auxiliary neuroprotective strategy combined with endovascular recanalization in the treatment of patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD). Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study, including patients aged 60 and older with ICVD and operation duration≥2 h in Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2016 to September 2021 and received endovascular recanalization under general anesthesia. A total of 351 patients were divided into H group (100% O2, 109 cases) and L group (50% O2, 242 cases) according to the intraoperative inhaled oxygen concentration. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale （NIHSS) score was used to evaluate the degree of neurological deficit in stroke patients. Modified Rankin Scale （mRS） score was applied to evaluated the recovery status of neurological function in patients after stroke. We also compared the differences of NIHSS score and mRS score after operation and discharge, and postoperative complications (pneumonia, re-stroke, cerebral hemorrhage) between the two groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation factors with NIHSS score. Results There was no significant difference in the postoperative and discharge NIHSS score, mRS score and postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared to H group, the hospital stay in L group was significantly shorter (P<0.05). The relevant factor for postoperative NIHSS score were oxygen concentration, emergency, preoperative stenosis rate, stenosis length, hyperlipidemia, preoperative NIHSS score and preoperative mRS score. Conclusion Although normobaric hyperoxia has limited effect as an adjuvant neuroprotective strategy based on vascular recanalization in patients with ICVD, it has no significant effect on the recent neurological recovery of patients, but it does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications.

Key words: normobaric hyperoxia, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale（NIHSS） score, modified Rankin Scale(mRS) score

中图分类号:

R614
R743

胡正芳, 王娟, 菅敏钰, 韩如泉. 术中吸氧浓度对行脑血管再通术患者术后神经功能和并发症的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(5): 865-871.

Hu Zhengfang, Wang Juan, Jian Minyu, Han Ruquan. ffect of intraoperative oxygen concentration on postoperative neurological function and complications in patients undergoing cerebrovascular recanalization[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2023, 44(5): 865-871.

参考文献

［1］Goyal M, Menon B K, van Zwam W H, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials［J］. Lancet, 2016, 387(10029): 1723－1731.
［2］Powers W J, Rabinstein A A, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association［J］. Stroke, 2019, 50(12): e344－e418.
［3］Jadhav A P, Jovin T G. Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: the standard of care［J］. Brain Circ, 2016, 2(4): 178－182.
［4］Geng X K, Elmadhoun O, Peng C Y, et al. Ethanol and normobaric oxygen: novel approach in modulating pyruvate dehydrogenase complex after severe transient and permanent ischemic stroke［J］. Stroke, 2015, 46(2): 492－499.
［5］Thibodeau A, Geng X K, Previch L E, et al. Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury［J］. Brain Circ, 2016, 2(2): 61－66.
［6］Yang D B, Ma L Y, Wang P, et al. Normobaric oxygen inhibits AQP4 and NHE1 expression in experimental focal ischemic stroke［J］. Int J Mol Med, 2019, 43(3): 1193－1202.
［7］Ejaz S, Emmrich J V, Sitnikov S L, et al. Normobaric hyperoxia markedly reduces brain damage and sensorimotor deficits following brief focal ischaemia［J］. Brain, 2016, 139(Pt 3): 751－764.
［8］Cai L P, Stevenson J, Geng X K, et al. Combining normobaric oxygen with ethanol or hypothermia prevents brain damage from thromboembolic stroke via PKC-Akt-NOX modulation［J］. Mol Neurobiol, 2017, 54(2): 1263－1277.
［9］Padma M V, Bhasin A, Bhatia R, et al. Normobaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a pilot study in Indian patients［J］. Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 2010, 13(4): 284－288.
［10］Cheng Z, Geng X K, Tong Y N, et al. Adjuvant high-flow normobaric oxygen after mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke: a randomized clinical trial［J］. Neurotherapeutics, 2021, 18(2): 1188－1197.
［11］Ding J Y, Zhou D, Sui M, et al. The effect of normobaric oxygen in patients with acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］. Neurol Res, 2018, 40(6): 433－444.
［12］Hirunpattarasilp C, Shiina H, Na-Ek N, et al. The effect of hyperoxemia on neurological outcomes of adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis［J］. Neurocrit Care, 2022, 36(3): 1027－1043.
［13］Cheng Z, Gao J, Rajah G B, et al. Adjuvant high-flow normobaric oxygen after mechanical thrombectomy for posterior circulation stroke: a randomized clinical trial［J］. J Neurol Sci, 2022, 441: 120350.
［14］Allegranzi B, Zayed B, Bischoff P, et al. WHO Guidelines Development Group. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective［J］. Lancet Infect Dis, 2016,16(12),e288-e303.
［15］Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection［J］. JAMA Surg. 2017,152(8):784-791.
［16］朱晓冬, 马辉, 程焱. 脑梗死患者呼吸中枢驱动和呼吸功能的变化［J］. 中华神经科杂志, 2008, 41(11): 738－741.
［17］Liu S M, Shi H L, Liu W L, et al. Interstitial pO2 in ischemic penumbra and core are differentially affected following transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats［J］. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2004, 24(3): 343－349.
［18］Allen C L, Bayraktutan U. Oxidative stress and its role in the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke［J］. Int J Stroke, 2009, 4(6): 461－470.
［19］Lee P J, Choi A M K. Pathways of cell signaling in hyperoxia［J］. Free Radic Biol Med, 2003, 35(4): 341－350.
［20］López H V, Vivas M F, Ruiz R N, et al. Association between post-procedural hyperoxia and poor functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: an observational study［J］. Ann Intensive Care, 2019, 9(1): 59.
［21］Meyhoff C S, Jorgensen L N, Wetterslev J, et al. Increased long-term mortality after a high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction during abdominal surgery: follow-up of a randomized clinical trial［J］. Anesth Analg, 2012, 115(4): 849－854.
［22］Fonnes S, Gögenur I, Søndergaard E S, et al. Perioperative hyperoxia-long-term impact on cardiovascular complications after abdominal surgery, a post hoc analysis of the PROXI trial［J］. Int J Cardiol, 2016, 215: 238－243.
［23］Meyhoff C S, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen L N, et al. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial［J］. JAMA, 2009, 302(14): 1543－1550.
［24］Kongebro E K, Jorgensen L N, Siersma V D, et al. Association between perioperative hyperoxia and cerebrovascular complications after laparotomy-a post-hoc follow-up study［J］. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2019, 63(2): 164－170.
［25］Weenink R P, de Jonge S W, van Hulst R A, et al. Perioperative hyperoxyphobia: justified or not? Benefits and harms of hyperoxia during surgery［J］. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(3): 642.

[1]	何敏, 马佳佳, 韩如泉. 视觉诱发电位监测在围术期应用的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 221-225.
[2]	陈奕玮, 吴侑煊, 梁发, 韩如泉. 星状神经节阻滞对蛛网膜下腔出血后脑血管痉挛影响的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 226-230.
[3]	王昕馨, 杨宛凝, 菅敏钰, 梁发, 刘海洋, 韩如泉. 全身麻醉手术下慢性意识障碍患者的临床特征及意识改善预测[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 231-236.
[4]	梁发, 吴侑煊, 王鑫焱, 菅敏钰, 刘海洋, 韩如泉. 全身麻醉转化对急性脑卒中患者机械取栓术后神经功能的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 237-243.
[5]	王成尉, 袁琳淞, 周扬, 王会文. 儿童神经外科麻醉苏醒期谵妄和躁动的危险因素分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 244-247.
[6]	景龙年, 雷成, 姚婧鑫, 韩如泉. 氨甲环酸对脑脊索瘤切除术围术期出血量的影响：一项随机对照研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2023, 44(2): 289-294.
[7]	马佳佳, 岳红丽, 王德祥, 金旭, 韩如泉. 不同剂量右美托咪定对儿童颅脑术后苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2021, 42(3): 459-463.
[8]	张菊霞, 黄枭, 吴安石. HTP102型无创鼓膜温度持续监测装置在不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 617-621.
[9]	侯瑞雪, 尹橙, 王天龙. 全身麻醉或联合颈丛阻滞用于甲状腺手术术后镇痛效果的观察[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 253-256.
[10]	赖光辉, 张达谦, 倪家骧. 影像引导下蝶腭神经节联合选择性颈神经阻滞治疗蝶腭神经痛的回顾性分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 272-276.
[11]	齐新宇, 黄蕊, 朱斌, 姚兰. 加速康复外科理念在人工全膝关节置换术麻醉管理中的应用进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 307-311.
[12]	崔旭, 纪方, 舒洛娃, 李俊发, 潘楚雄. cPKCγ膜转位在Herkinorin减轻MCAO小鼠脑缺血再灌注损伤中的作用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 336-341.
[13]	陈玢, 刘伟, 史志国, 刘涛, 郑晖. 七氟烷与高浓度氧对老年小鼠海马caspase-3的表达及认知功能的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 348-351.
[14]	蔡晓飞, 牛少宁, 丁乔, 程灏. 不同麻醉药物行全身麻醉复合硬膜外阻滞对肝脏切除术后肝肾功能的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 352-356.
[15]	于琳琳, 王军, 马越, 郭向阳. 不同肌松水平对术中脊髓神经电生理监测的影响[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 357-360.