首都医科大学学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 752-754.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术比较

龙棣1, 成九梅1, 王海鸥1, 李云飞1, 朱宪2   

  1. 1. 首都医科大学附属复兴医院妇产科;2. 首都医科大学门诊部
  • 收稿日期:2005-01-12 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-12-24 发布日期:2005-12-24

A Comparison between Transabdominal and Laparoscopic Myomectomy

Long Di1, Cheng Jiumei1, Wang Haiou1, Li Yunfei1, Zhu Xian2   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fuxing Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences;2. Clinic of Capital University of Medical Sciences
  • Received:2005-01-12 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2005-12-24 Published:2005-12-24

摘要: 目的 探讨腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的疗效及其临床应用价值。方法 回顾分析2003年10月至2004年9月复兴医院妇产科收治的53例腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术和40例开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床资料。结果 手术均顺利完成,无术中及术后并发症。腹腔镜肌瘤剔除术后患者排尿、排气时间及术后病率均小于开腹组,开腹肌瘤剔除组的手术时间短于腹腔镜组,且其剔除肌瘤数大于腹腔镜肌瘤剔除组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术具有创伤小、恢复快等优点,是一种安全有效的手术方法,而开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术更适用于病情复杂的病例,术者应根据患者的病情正确选择手术方式。

关键词: 子宫肌瘤, 子宫肌瘤剔除术, 腹腔镜

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and clinical value of transabdominal myomectomy(TAM) and laparoscopic myomectomy(LM).Methods The clinical date of 53 cases of LMand 40 cases of TAMwere retrospectively analyzed.Results All operations were performed successfully.No operation-related complications occurred in any cases.Compared with group TAMthe group LMhas many advantages in postoperative farting time and uriating time.The operating time in group TAMis markedly more than that in group LM.Conclusion LMhas the advantages of less invasion, early resumption of normal activities.LMis safe and effective means for simple cases.TAMis more fit for complex cases.The operation patterns should be chosen properly.

Key words: leiomyoma, myomectomy, laparoscopy

中图分类号: