Journal of Capital Medical University ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 582-587.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2021.04.012

• Basic Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Constructing the social psychological counseling standard service evaluation indicators in Beijing with qualitative method

Qi Han1,2, Bai Binger1,2, Liu Songhuai3,4, Xi Yingjun1,2, Jin Wenqing1,2, Li Yuqing5, Yan Fang1,2*   

  1. 1. The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, School of Mental Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China;
    2. Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China;
    3. Department of Psychology, School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100068, China;
    4. Department of Psychology, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;
    5. Beijing Association of Preventive Medicine, Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2020-11-03 Online:2021-08-21 Published:2021-07-29
  • Contact: * E-mail:emillyyf@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1311100), Beijing Municipal Commission of Health (TC190V1JW).

Abstract: Objective To construct the standard evaluation system of social psychological counseling management specification in Beijing. Methods The evaluation indicators were initially extracted by literature search, and the opinions and suggestions of experts in mental health related fields were collected through personal in-depth interviews. The Nvivo 12.0 software was used to sort, code, analyze and integrate the interview scripts, and the three-level indicator system was preliminarily formed. Then, 79 experts were invited to participate in two rounds of Delphi expert consultation by online questionnaires to evaluate the indicator system. Indicators were statistically analyzed, screened and modified according to the scores of importance, operability and sensitivity. Results Three first-level indicators, 13 second-level indicators, and 80 third-level indicators were first constructed after the literature searching and Depth personal interview. Then, 3 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 42 third-level indicators were included in the first round Delphi consultations after the pre-evaluation and discussion of experts. The enthusiasm coefficient, authority coefficient and the coordination coefficients for the first-round Delphi consultation were 96.2%, 0.80±0.03 and 0.124, respectively. The enthusiasm coefficient, authority coefficient and the coordination coefficients for the second-round Delphi consultation were 83.3%, 0.83±0.02 and 0.095, respectively. After the screening, supplement and combination of indicators, the standard index system including 3 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators and 45 third-level indicators were finally constructed. Conclusion This study constructed the management standard of social psychological consultation in Beijing using qualitative method, and the effects of the specification need to be further explored and improved in practice.

Key words: psychological counseling, evaluation indicators, depth personal interview, Delphi expert consultation

CLC Number: