首都医科大学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 115-120.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2012.01.024

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年急性心肌梗死患者出院后二级预防现状调查

许敏1, 郭金成1, 华琦2   

  1. 1. 北京市通州区潞河医院心内科, 北京 101149;2. 首都医科大学宣武医院心内科, 北京 100053
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2012-02-21 发布日期:2012-02-21
  • 通讯作者: 许敏

Investigation on the situation of secondary prevention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

XU Min1, GUO Jin-cheng1, HUA Qi2   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Tongzhou District Luhe Hospital, Beijing 101149, China;2. Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2011-07-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2012-02-21 Published:2012-02-21

摘要: 目的 调查老年急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, STEMI)患者出院后二级预防现状,分析影响老年STEMI患者二级预防的因素以及二级预防状况对主要不良心脏事件(major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE)的影响。方法 回顾性分析2009年10月~2010年7月间在北京通州区潞河医院CCU连续住院并好转的老年STEMI患者107例,其中男性73例,女性34例,患者年龄60~84岁,平均年龄(66.54±6.19)岁,门诊随访时间6~15月。根据二级预防状况分为良好组45例和不良组62例,分析老年STEMI患者出院后二级预防的状况及其影响因素,并比较2组MACE事件的发生率。结果 42.1%患者二级预防良好,采用多因素Logistic回归方法分析预测二级预防状况,独立变量是为接受健康教育的程度(OR=9.14,95% CI:1.57~53.31)、医疗保险类型(OR=9.32,95%CI:1.80~48.22)。二级预防良好组MACE和临床事件发生率均明显低于二级预防不良组(8.9% vs 40.3%,17.8% vs 57.8%, P<0.05)。结论 老年STEMI患者出院后二级预防现状与指南要求存在较大差距,医疗保险类型、接受健康教育的程度是预测二级预防状况的独立变量。良好的二级预防可明显降低老年STEMI患者MACE发生率。

关键词: 心肌梗死, 急性, 二级预防, 老年人

Abstract: Objective To investigate the situation of the secondary prevention and analyze the influencing factors on secondary prevention and explore the relationship between secondary prevention and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among the elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 107 hospitalized elderly survivors (73 male, 34 female) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled from October 2009 to July 2010 in Beijing Lube Hospital, the mean age was 66.54±6.19 (60 to 84) years. All the cases were followed up in clinic in January 2011,follow-up time was 6 to 15 months.According to the situation of secondary prevention, 107 cases were divided into two groups: good secondary prevention group (45 cases) and poor secondary prevention group (62 cases). The influencing factors on secondary prevention were analyzed and the incidence of MACE of the two groups were compared.Results The situation of secondary prevention of 42.1% of patients was well. A stepwise logistic regression analysis further suggested the following independent predictors to secondary prevention: the degree of receiving health education (OR=9.14,95%CI: 1.57~53.31), type of medical insurance(OR=9.32, 95%CI:1.80~48.22). The incidence of MACE and clinical events of good secondary prevention group was significantly lower than the poor secondary prevention group (8.9% vs 40.3%, 17.8% vs 57.8%, P﹤0.05). Conclusion The secondary prevention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction after discharge is not optimistic, and there was a wide gap to the guideline of AMI. The type of medical insurance and the degree of receiving health education were independent variables to predict the secondary prevention. Good secondary prevention can significantly reduce major adverse cardiac events.

Key words: myocardial infarction, acute, secondary prevention, elderly people

中图分类号: