Investigation of treatment protocol for cesarean scar pregnancy type I

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2019.04.026

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To compare ultrasound-guided uterine curettage and uterine curettage after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)type I treatment. Methods We performed retrospective case control study,fifty-two patients were given ultrasound-guided uterine curettage as the study group,26 patients were given UAE followed by ultrasound-guided uterine curettage as the control group. Ultrasound examination was used for the diagnosis. Results The treatment success rate of the study group was 98%,and that of the control group was 100%. There was no significant difference of operation time and bleeding volume between the two groups. The decrease of serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) both of two group were satisfactory. But at 1 day,7 days and 14days after operation, the decrease of serum HCG of study group was significantly slower than that of the control group. The time of blood HCG return to normal after operation of the study group and the control group was (24.38 ±9.23)days vs (19.12 ±4.23)days,and length of bleeding days after operation were (12.19±7.54)days and (8.58±3.01)days. The differences were significant. The days of menstrual recovery of the study group and the control group were (33.54 ±5.98)days and (32.69 ±5.13)days,respectively. There was no significant difference,but 30.8% menstrual reduction of the study group was significantly higher than 61.5% of the control group. In the study group,36.5% of abnormal mass in the lower anterior wall of uterine cavity can be found by ultrasound examination after the first menstruation was significantly higher than 15.4% that of the control group,but there was no difference of the size of the mass between the two groups. Conclusion CSP type I can be safely and effectively treated by ultrasound guided curettage. But surgery should be carried out in the hospital which are capable of salvage because bleeding risk of CSP is extremely high. For the treatment of CSP,monitoring the decrease of HCG is very important. Some patients showed slow descent of HCG in blood,which should be examined and treated promptly.

Key words: cesarean scar pregnancy, uterine curettage, uterine artery embolization, human chorionic gonadotropin

CLC Number:

R711

Luo Lanrong, Li Changdong. Investigation of treatment protocol for cesarean scar pregnancy type I[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2019, 40(4): 640-645.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal03.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_sdykdxxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2019.04.026

https://journal03.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_sdykdxxb/EN/Y2019/V40/I4/640

References 26

[1]	中华医学会妇产科学分会计划生育学组. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(8):568-572.
[2]	Vial Y,Petignat P,Hohlfbld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2000,16(6):592-593.
[3]	Ghezzi F,Lagana D,Franchi M,et al. Conservative treatment by chemotherapy and uterine artieries embolization of a cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repord Biol,2002,103(1):88-91.
[4]	Yang X Y,Yu H,Li K M,et al. Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. BJOG,2010,117(8):990-996.
[5]	Yela D A,Marchiani N. Conservative management of ectopic pregnancy in cesarean scar pregnancy; case report[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet,2013,35(5):233-237.
[6]	袁岩,戴晴,蔡胜,等. 超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断的诊断价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2010,19(4):321-324.
[7]	邵华江,马建婷,苏晓敏,等. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠个体化治疗61例分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志,2013,2(2):127-131.
[8]	Godin P A,Bassil S,Donnez J.An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarean section scar[J]. Fertil Steril,1997,67(2):398-400.
[9]	柯玲,李志英,潘敏,等.基于子宫瘢痕妊娠分型的治疗方案探讨[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2017,25(9):627-630.
[10]	王燕捷,翟妍,张震宇,等. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床特征与处理结局[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(13):986-990.
[11]	张宁宁,杨清.早孕期剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床及病理特点分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报,2011,40(5):458-461.
[12]	Maymon R,Halperin R,Mendlovic S, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean section scars:the 8 year experience of one medical center[J]. Human Reprod,2004,19(2):278-284.
[13]	林莉,赵旭东. 不同途径彩色多普勒超声诊断剖宫产瘢痕妊娠44例比较分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2014,30(9):690-692.
[14]	夏恩兰,陈芳,薛翔,等. 子宫腔球囊压迫止血的临床应用[J].中华妇产科杂志,2002,37(3):185-186.
[15]	Jurkovic D,Hillaby K,Woelfer B,et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine caesarean section scar[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2003,21(3):220-227.
[16]	Chuang J,Seow K M,Cheng W C,et al. Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a caesarean section scar[J]. BJOG,2003,110(9):869-870.
[17]	金力,范光升,郎景和. 剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的早期诊断与治疗[J]. 生殖与避孕,2005,25(10):630-634.
[18]	张国福,王添平,谷守欣,等. 子宫动脉化疗栓塞在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中的应用研究[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,19(12):936-940.
[19]	张雪松,候成帧,顾向应.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗方法优劣的荟萃分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,11(5):17-14.
[20]	程春霞,薛敏. 剖宫产疤痕部位妊娠保守性治疗:附20例分析[J]. 南方医科大学学报,2009,29(6):1281-1282.
[21]	Hardeman S,Decroisette E,Marin B,et al. Fertility after embolization of the uterine arteries to treat obstetrical hemorrhage:a review of 53 cases[J]. Fertil Steril,2010,94(7):2574-2579.
[22]	邢慧敏, 梁军,杨蕾,杨波.子宫动脉阻断术与子宫动脉栓塞术在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠手术治疗中的应用研究[J].解放军医药杂志,2016,28(12):99-101,105.
[23]	Poujade O,Ceccaldi P F,Davitian C,et al. Uterine necrosis following pelvic arterial embolization for post-partum hemorrhage:review of the literature[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol,2013,170(2):309-314.
[24]	Chitrit Y,Zafy S,Pelage J P,et al. Amenorrhea due to partial uterine necrosis after uterine artery embolization for control of refractory postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2006,127(1):140-142.
[25]	Arthur R,Kachura J,Liu G,et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy versus uterine artery embolization:long-term impact on markers of ovarian reserve[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2014, 36(3):240-247.
[26]	Hehenkamp W J,Volkers N A,Broekmans F J,et al. Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization:a randomized comparison with hysterectomy[J].Hum Reprod,2007,22(7):1996-2005.