Journal of Capital Medical University ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 820-825.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2025.05.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation general anesthesia for pulse generator implantation surgery in Parkinson's disease patients

Tong Yuanyuan, Xie Sining, Chen Liang, Li Xiangjiahui, Han Ruquan, Xiong Wei*   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2025-07-01 Revised:2025-08-13 Online:2025-10-21 Published:2025-10-22
  • Supported by:
     This study was supported by Bethune Charitable Foundation (bnmr-2023-009). 

Abstract: Objective  To analyze the application effects of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) general anesthesia versus endotracheal intubation (ETI) general anesthesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantable pulse generator (IPG) surgery. Methods  A retrospective analysis was conducted on 164 PD patients who underwent IPG surgery at our hospital from August 2020 to February 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on airway management: LMA group (n=61) and ETI group (n=103). Perioperative hemodynamic parameters, including mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR), were observed at five time points: pre-induction (T0), post-induction (T1), skin incision (T2), extubation (T3), and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) admission (T4). Key outcomes, such as extubation time, intraoperative hypoxia events, LMA-to-ETI conversion rate, and postoperative complications (respiratory depression, pneumonia), were compared between the two groups. Results  The LMA group had a significantly lower body mass index than the ETI group [(22.75±3.11 )kg/m2 vs (23.85±3.49) kg/m2, P=0.039], while the other baseline characteristics were comparable. After induction, the LMA group exhibited a less decrease in MAP[ (85.46±11.63) mmHg vs (74.13±11.78) mmHg in the ETI group, P<0.001]. At extubation, the ETI group showed higher MAP [(98.27±13.78) mmHg vs (89.66±10.50) mmHg in the LMA group, P<0.001]. The intraoperative use of vasoactive drugs was significantly lower in the LMA group (3.3%) than that in the ETI group (13.6%, P=0.032). The mean extubation time was shorter in the LMA group[ (8.43±5.25) min vs (14.28±7.66) min in the ETI group, P<0.001]. No intraoperative hypoxia or LMA-to-ETI conversion events occurred in either group. Postoperative respiratory depression and pneumonia rates showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. Conclusion  LMA general anesthesia can be safely applied in PD patients undergoing DBS IPG implantation. It shortens extubation time, reduces the use of vasoactive drugs, and does not increase the risk of intubation-related complications.

Key words: Parkinson's disease (PD),  , implantable pulse generator (IPG), laryngeal mask airway (LMA), endotracheal intubation (ETI), general anesthesia, deep brain stimulation

CLC Number: