Journal of Capital Medical University ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 205-209.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2014.02.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Efficacy and safety of low dosage risperidone added on valproate and citalopram in the treatment of acute bipolar depression

Wang Jian, Wang Gang, Ma Xin   

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2014-02-18 Online:2014-04-21 Published:2014-04-16
  • Contact: 马辛 E-mail:maxinanding@vip.163.com
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by Scientific Project of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission(D121100005012002).

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the augmentation efficacy and safety of low dosage risperidone, added on the usual treatment(valproate and citalopram) in the acute treatment of bipolar depression. Methods A total of 46 inpatients with a diagnostic criteria for acute depression episode with bipolar disorder according to DSM-IV-TR were first given valproate and citalopram treatment. The subjects who achieve little clinical response(i.e. reduction from baseline in total MADRS score by <50%) at the end of 2-week will enter into the randomized open-label 6-week treatment phase. The eligible subjects will be randomized to treatment with valproate & citalopram or valproate & citalopram & risperidone in a 1:1 ratio. Efficacy rating scales to be used in the study include MADRS, YMRS, BPRS(total score and positive subscale), CGI-S, and CGI-I. The evaluations of safety and tolerability include SAS, treatment-emergent mania, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, ECG, and adverse events reports. Results At the end of treatment, the scores of MADRS, BPRS, GIC-I, and CGI-S in both treatment groups decreased significantly compared with the end of run-in period.There were statistically significant differences between groups in YMRS and CGI-I(P<0.05), but not in MADRS and BPRS(total score and positive subscale). At week 1 of randomized treatment period, the scores of BPRS positive subscale decreased sharply in the VPA+CIT+RIS group than those in the VPA+CIT group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). At week 2 of randomized treatment period, the response rates of the VPA+CIT+RIS group was superior to the VPA+CIT group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). It suggested that the time to response of the VPA+CIT+RIS group is shorter than that of the VPA+CIT group. Conclusion Both VPA+CIT+RIS and VPA+CIT are efficacious and well tolerated for the acute treatment of bipolar depression. For the treatment of psychosis and reducing the treatment-emergent mania, the VPA+CIT group was better than the VPA+CIT group.

Key words: resperidone, augmentation treatment, bipolar disorder, acute depressive episode

CLC Number: