Application of computed tomography angiography in evaluation of bridging vessels after coronary artery bypass grafting

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2019.01.027

Abstract

Abstract: The patency of the bridging vessels is an important factor in terms of surgical outcomes and prognoses in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Therefore, evaluation of bridging vessels is of important clinical significance. Coronary angiography is a dominant method for the evaluation of bridge vessels. However, due to its invasiveness and complications, patients are usually required to be hospitalized and hence resulting in limited clinical application. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is non-invasive, easy to operate, and reproducible. With the development of computed tomography technology, the application of CTA in the evaluation of bridge blood vessels has attracted more and more attention. This paper reviews the application history, current situation, hot issues and future development of CTA in bridge vessel evaluation.

Key words: tomography, X-ray computed, coronary artery bypass grafting, bridge vessels

CLC Number:

Liu Fei, Zhou Ziqiang, Wu Mingying, Xian Junfang. Application of computed tomography angiography in evaluation of bridging vessels after coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2019, 40(1): 150-156.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal03.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_sdykdxxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2019.01.027

https://journal03.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_sdykdxxb/EN/Y2019/V40/I1/150

References

[1] Kulik A. Quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention:what do the trials tell us?[J]. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2017, 32(6):707-714.
[2] Scanlon P J, Faxon D P, Audet A M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography:executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on coronary angiography) developed in collabora[J]. Circulation, 1999, 99(17):2345-2357.
[3] Gobel F L, Stewart W J, Campeau L, et al. Safety of coronary arteriography in clinically stable patients following coronary bypass surgery. Post CABG Clinical Trial Investigators[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1998, 45(4):376-381.
[4] Pesenti-Rossi D, Baron N, Georges J L, et al. Assessment of coronary bypass graft patency by first-line multi-detector computed tomography[J]. Ann Cardiol(Paris), 2014, 63(5):284-292.
[5] Trigo Bautista A, Estorneu J, Ridocci F, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by computed tomography:comparison with conventional coronary angiography[J]. Rev Esp Cardiol, 2005, 58(7):807-814.
[6] Brundage B H, Lipton M J, Herfkens R J, et al. Detection of patent coronary bypass grafts by computed tomography. A preliminary report[J]. Circulation, 1980, 61(4):826-831.
[7] Burgstahler C, Kuettner A, Kopp A F, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using multi-slice computed tomography:initial clinical experience[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2003, 90(2-3):275-280.
[8] Stein P D, Beemath A, Skaf E, et al. Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2005, 96(12):1669-1673.
[9] 吕滨, 曹慧丽, 杨立,等. CT血管成像评价冠状动脉搭桥血管通畅性的多中心研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2014, 48(1):33-37.
[10] Feuchtner G M, Schachner T, Bonatti J, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007, 189(3):574-580.
[11] Ropers D, Pohle F K, Kuettner A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation[J]. Circulation, 2006, 114(22):2334-2341.
[12] Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L, et al. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2007, 99(11):1529-1534.
[13] Meyer T S, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(9):946-950.
[14] Malhotra R, Mishra M, Khurana P, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts assessment at one year by noninvasive multislice computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography[J]. Innovations, 2007, 2(3):116-120.
[15] Lee R, Lim J, Kaw G, et al. Comprehensive noninvasive evaluation of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in patients after coronary bypass surgery:accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography compared to invasive coronary angiography[J]. J Cardiovasc Med, 2010, 11(2):81-90.
[16] Barbero U, Iannaccone M, d'Ascenzo F, et al. 64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis:a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2016, 216:52-57.
[17] 杨秀江. CT空间分辨率和低对比度分辨率的检测及其影响因素[J]. 科技视界, 2018,21(14):72-73.
[18] Kalisz K, Buethe J, Saboo S S, et al. Artifacts at cardiac CT:physics and solutions[J]. Radiographics, 2016, 36(7):2064-2083.
[19] Nguyen T C, Ohyama Y, Taketomi-Takahashi A, et al. Influence of cardiac function on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography[J]. Clin Imaging, 2019, 53:58-64.
[20] Lee J H, Chun E J, Choi S I, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency:comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2011, 27(5):657-667.
[21] 王刚, 陈莉, 郑树卿. 多层螺旋CT后处理技术的临床研究[J]. 放射学实践, 2013, 28(10):1076-1079.
[22] Hara A K, Paden R G, Silva A C, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT:feasibility study[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193(3):764-771.
[23] Lim K, Kwon H, Cho J, et al. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2015,39(3):443-448.
[24] Ippolito D, Fior D, Franzesi C T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating combined with fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of coronary artery bypass:evaluation of dose reduction and image quality[J]. Radiol Med, 2017, 122(12):893-901.
[25] 张保朋, 王道清, 杨中杰, 等. 双源CT冠状动脉成像评价冠状动脉搭桥术后桥血管通畅情况[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2012,20(9):672-674,676.
[26] Koplay M, Guneyli S, Akbayrak H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and effective radiation dose of high pitch dual source multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2016, 128(13-14):488-494.
[27] 徐磊, 王辉, 张楠, 等. 双源CT"双低"成像在冠状动脉桥血管的初步研究[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2014,24(11):1882-1886.
[28] 杨涛, 顾静华, 李新明. 双源CT对冠脉搭桥术后桥血管评价的Meta分析[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2017, 26(3):285-290.
[29] 晏子旭, 杨琳, 于薇,等. 320排容积CT在冠状动脉搭桥术后桥血管成像中的应用[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2011, 22(7):472-478.
[30] de Graaf F R, Van Velzen J E, Witkowska A J, et al. Diagnostic performance of 320-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(11):2285-2296.
[31] Markwardt F, Emrich T, Midenberger P, et al. Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MD-CTA) of coronary artery bypass grafts-update 2017[J].Rofo, 2018, 190(3):237-249.
[32] 汪芳, 郝万庆, 杨利莉, 等. 256排宽体探测器CT智能心电门控技术在不控制心率患者冠状动脉CTA中的应用[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33(7):1080-1084.
[33] Zeyneb Y, Mecit K, Ihsan Y, et al. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency:diagnostic efficiency of high-pitch dual-source 256-slice MDCT findings[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2014, 38(1):61-66.
[34] Wardziak Ł, Kruk M, Pleban W, et al. Coronary CTA enhanced with CTA based FFR analysis provides higher diagnostic value than invasive coronary angiography in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2018, pii:S1934-5925(18):20407-6.
[35] Colombo A, Giannini F. Is it time to replace conventional angiography with coronary computed tomography?[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018,39(41):3699-3700.
[36] 白琛, 唐芳,张志,李刚.冠状动脉CT血管成像联合心肌血流储备分数对冠心病心肌缺血诊断价值的研究[J].解放军医药杂志,2018,30(2):102-105.