慢性鼻窦炎术后复发额窦炎患者额隐窝气房残留情况的影像及再手术结果分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2022.06.015

首都医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 911-918.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7795.2022.06.015

慢性鼻窦炎术后复发额窦炎患者额隐窝气房残留情况的影像及再手术结果分析

史慕寒^1#, 王冲^2#, 王旻^1*, 袁飞³, 邢志敏¹, 袁晓培¹, 吴雨潇¹

1.北京大学人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,北京 100044;
2.内蒙古自治区人民医院耳鼻喉科,呼和浩特 010017;
3.北京大学人民医院放射科,北京 100044

收稿日期:2022-09-06 出版日期:2022-12-21 发布日期:2022-11-30
作者简介:^#共同第一作者
基金资助:
首都卫生发展科研专项基金(2021-1-2051),北京大学人民医院研究发展基金(RDL-2021-05)。

Analysis of radiological results of residual frontal recess cells and the efficacy of revision surgery in patients with recurrent frontal sinusitis after sinusotomy

Shi Muhan^1#, Wang Chong^2#, Wang Min^1*, Yuan Fei³, Xing Zhimin¹, Yuan Xiaopei¹, Wu Yuxiao¹

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China;
2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China;
3. Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2022-09-06 Online:2022-12-21 Published:2022-11-30
Contact: ^*E-mail:minwang333@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过分析鼻内镜手术后复发额窦炎患者的电子计算机断层显像(computed tomography, CT),探究额隐窝气房残留情况以及再次手术后的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年12月于北京大学人民医院耳鼻咽喉科住院行手术治疗的慢性鼻窦炎术后复发额窦炎的患者64例,统计患者术前及术后1年的鼻部症状视觉模拟量表(Visual Analog Scales, VAS)评分。根据国际额隐窝气房分型(The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification,IFAC)的标准对患者鼻窦CT进行分析,对各类额隐窝气房的残留情况进行统计,同时统计各额窦的Lund-Mackay评分(LM值),使用SPSS 27.0软件对患者的一般信息及额隐窝气房残留情况与额窦LM值的关系进行统计学分析,分析患者术前和术后VAS评分变化有无统计学意义。结果共分析额窦121侧,各种额隐窝气房均有残留,气房残留情况为:鼻丘气房共108侧(89.3%)、鼻丘上气房共11侧(9.1%)、鼻丘上额气房共19侧(15.7%)、筛泡上气房共20侧(16.5%)、筛泡上额气房共13侧(10.7%)、眶上筛房共40侧(33.1%)、额窦间隔气房共49侧(40.5%)、1型额窦间隔气房共15侧(12.4%)、2型额窦间隔气房共34侧(28.1%),其中额窦间隔气房和眶上筛房相对更容易残留。术后1年随访人数为54例,患者术前及术后1年鼻部症状VAS评分平均值分别为6.6±1.4和2.8±1.4。共7例行Draf Ⅲ型手术,术前及术后1年鼻部症状VAS评分平均值分别为7.6±1.1和3.9±0.9。统计学分析显示,先前的手术次数(P=0.016, OR=2.639)与额窦LM值增长相关, 患者术前及术后VAS评分差异有统计学意义(t=19.656, P<0.01)。结论复发的鼻窦炎患者中部分额隐窝气房残留比例较高,这可能是导致术后复发的危险因素,在手术中应彻底清除额隐窝气房,通畅引流,预防复发。

关键词: 慢性鼻窦炎, 额隐窝气房, 鼻内镜手术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the situation of residual frontal recess cells and efficacy of revision surgery by analyzing the computed tomographic (CT) results of the patients with recurrent frontal sinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis of 64 chronic rhinosinusitis patients with recurrent frontal sinusitis after surgery who were prepared for surgery in Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of Peking University People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 was performed. The results of Visual Analog Scales (VAS) of nasal symptoms of the patients before and after surgery were collected. The patients' CT were analyzed according to The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) to record the prevalence of every type of the residual frontal recess cells. The Lund-Mackay (LM) scores of all frontal sinuses were also recorded. The relationship of the patient's general information and the situation of residual frontal recess cells between the frontal sinus LM sores was analyzed statistically by using SPSS 27.0. The VAS scores of patients before and after surgery were analyzed. Results In this study 121 sides frontal sinuses were evolved. All kinds of frontal recess cells were found in the patients: agger nasi cell in 108 sides (89.3%), supra agger cell in 11 sides (9.1%), supra agger cell in 19 sides (15.7%), supra bulla cell in 20 sides (16.5%), supra bulla frontal cell in 13 sides (10.7%), supraorbital ethmoid cell in 40 sides (33.1%), frontal septal cell in 49 sides (40.5%), type 1 frontal septal cell in 15 sides (12.4%), and type 2 frontal septal cell in 34 sided (28.1%). Besides, the frontal septal cells and the supraorbital ethmoid cells were more prone to remaining. There were 54 patients followed up 1 year after surgery. The average VAS scores of the patients before and 1 year after surgery were 6.6±1.4 and 2.8±1.4, respectively. A total of 7 patients underwent Draf Ⅲ surgery. The mean VAS scores of total symptoms before and 1 year after surgery were 7.6±1.1 and 3.9±0.9, respectively. In statistical analysis, t the number of previous surgery (P=0.016, OR=2.639) was correlated with the increase of the frontal sinus LM sores. There were statistical differences between the VAS scores of the patients before and after surgery (t=19.656, P<0.01). Conclusions The proportion of some residual frontal recess cells were high in chronic rhinosinusitis patients after surgery. It may increase the risk of recurrence of frontal sinusitis. For the patients with recurrent frontal sinusitis, appropriate surgical skills should be measured. During the surgery, the frontal recess cells should be completely removed and ensure the drainage pathway smoothly to prevent recurrence.

Key words: chronic rhinosinusitis, frontal recess cell, endoscopic sinus surgery

中图分类号:

史慕寒, 王冲, 王旻, 袁飞, 邢志敏, 袁晓培, 吴雨潇. 慢性鼻窦炎术后复发额窦炎患者额隐窝气房残留情况的影像及再手术结果分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(6): 911-918.

Shi Muhan, Wang Chong, Wang Min, Yuan Fei, Xing Zhimin, Yuan Xiaopei, Wu Yuxiao. Analysis of radiological results of residual frontal recess cells and the efficacy of revision surgery in patients with recurrent frontal sinusitis after sinusotomy[J]. Journal of Capital Medical University, 2022, 43(6): 911-918.

参考文献

[1] Shi J B, Fu Q L, Zhang H, et al. Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: results from a cross-sectional survey in seven Chinese cities[J]. Allergy, 2015, 70(5): 533－539.
[2] Ramadan H H. Surgical causes of failure in endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Laryngoscope, 1999, 109(1): 27－29.
[3] Musy P Y, Kountakis S E. Anatomic findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2004, 25(6): 418－422.
[4] Bhattacharyya N. Clinical outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004, 130(8): 975－978.
[5] Chandra R K, Palmer J N, Tangsujarittham T, et al. Factors associated with failure of frontal sinusotomy in the early follow-up period[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004, 131(4): 514－518.
[6] Wormald P J, Hoseman W, Callejas C, et al. The international frontal sinus anatomy classification (IFAC) and classification of the extent of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (EFSS)[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2016, 6(7): 677－696.
[7] Fokkens W J, Lund V J, Hopkins C, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020[J]. Rhinology, 2020, 58(Suppl S29): 1－464.
[8] Valdes C J, Bogado M, Samaha M. Causes of failure in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis patients[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2014, 4(6): 502－506.
[9] Lanza D C, Kennedy D W. Adult rhinosinusitis defined[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1997, 117(3 Pt 2): S1-S7.
[10] Wang M, Yuan F, Qi W W, et al. Anatomy, classification of intersinus septal cell and its clinical significance in frontal sinus endoscopic surgery in Chinese subjects[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2012, 125(24): 4470－4473.
[11] Nakayama T, Asaka D, Kuboki A, et al. Impact of residual frontal recess cells on frontal sinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2018, 275(7): 1795－1801.
[12] Lund V J, Mackay I S. Staging in rhinosinusitus[J]. Rhinology, 1994, 31(4): 183－184.
[13] Okushi T, Mori E, Nakayama T, et al. Impact of residual ethmoid cells on postoperative course after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2012, 39(5): 484－489.
[14] Baban M I A, Mirza B, Castelnuovo P. Radiological and endoscopic findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2020, 42(9): 1003－1012.
[15] Kuhn F A. Chronic frontal sinusitis: the endoscopic frontal recess approach[J]. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg, 1996, 7(3): 222－229.
[16] Wormald P J, Bassiouni A, Callejas C A, et al. The international classification of the radiological complexity (ICC) of frontal recess and frontal sinus[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2017, 7(4): 332－337.
[17] Han D M, Zhang L, Ge W T, et al. Multiplanar computed tomographic analysis of the frontal recess region in Chinese subjects without frontal sinus disease symptoms[J]. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2008, 70(2): 104－112.
[18] Choby G, Thamboo A, Won T B, et al. Computed tomography analysis of frontal cell prevalence according to the international frontal sinus anatomy classification[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2018, 8(7): 825－830.
[19] Tran L V, Ngo N H, Psaltis A J. A radiological study assessing the prevalence of frontal recess cells and the most common frontal sinus drainage pathways[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2019, 33(3): 323－330.
[20] Sommer F, Hoffmann T K, Harter L, et al. Incidence of anatomical variations according to the international frontal sinus anatomy classification (IFAC) and their coincidence with radiological sings of opacification[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 276(11): 3139－3146.
[21] Shi M H, Wu Y X, Wang Y G, et al. Computed tomography analysis of the anterosuperior portion of the bulla lamella in Chinese subjects and its surgical significance in endoscopic frontal sinusotomy[J]. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2022, 84(4): 289－295.
[22] Kim K S, Kim H U, Chung I H, et al. Surgical anatomy of the nasofrontal duct: anatomical and computed tomographic analysis[J]. Laryngoscope, 2001, 111(4 Pt 1): 603－608.
[23] Bassiouni A, Wormald P J. Role of frontal sinus surgery in nasal polyp recurrence[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(1): 36－41.
[24] Naidoo Y, Bassiouni A, Keen M, et al. Long-term outcomes for the endoscopic modified Lothrop/Draf Ⅲ procedure: a 10-year review[J]. Laryngoscope, 2014, 124(1): 43－49.
[25] Barham H P, Ramakrishnan V R, Knisely A, et al. Frontal sinus surgery and sinus distribution of nasal irrigation[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2016, 6(3): 238－242.
[26] Barham H P, Hall C A, Hernandez S C, et al. Impact of Draf Ⅲ, Draf Ⅱb, and Draf Ⅱa frontal sinus surgery on nasal irrigation distribution[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2020, 10(1): 49－52.
[27] Manes R P, Tong L Y, Batra P S. Prospective evaluation of aerosol delivery by a powered nasal nebulizer in the cadaver model[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2011, 1(5): 366－371.
[28] 周兵, 黄谦, 王成硕, 等. 鼻内镜下经鼻改良Lothrop手术随访疗效分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 47(9): 728－734.

慢性鼻窦炎术后复发额窦炎患者额隐窝气房残留情况的影像及再手术结果分析

Analysis of radiological results of residual frontal recess cells and the efficacy of revision surgery in patients with recurrent frontal sinusitis after sinusotomy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王敏, 李颖, 王向东, 张罗. IL-23在慢性鼻窦炎中的表达和作用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 178-182.
[2]	王明, 卜祥婷, 栾格, 王阳, 王成硕, 张罗. MALAT1在慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉中的表达及对糖皮质激素治疗的反应性[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 183-188.
[3]	杜崑, 郑铭, 王向东, 张罗. 白细胞介素-21与复发性鼻息肉组织中IgE的相关性分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 194-199.
[4]	许庆庆, 段甦, 王向东, 张罗. 鼻中隔偏曲矫正对变应性鼻炎患者治疗效果的Meta分析[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2018, 39(6): 928-932.
[5]	闫冰, 王阳, 范尔钟, 李颖, 齐思涵, 楚晓晗, 王成硕, 张罗. ALOX15在慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉中表达及糖皮质激素对其作用研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2017, 38(5): 683-687.
[6]	伯铭羽, 王向东, 王鸿, 宋贝贝, 李颖, 范尔钟, 张罗. 重塑相关因子在慢性鼻窦炎的表达[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013, 34(6): 785-789.
[7]	李颖, 王向东, 王鸿, 伯铭羽, 宋贝贝, 范尔钟, 张罗. CC类趋化因子在慢性鼻窦炎的表达[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013, 34(6): 795-798.
[8]	李颖, 范尔钟, 伯铭羽, 王向东, 张罗. 细胞连接在慢性鼻窦炎中的表达及意义[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013, 34(6): 799-804.